Engagement/Wedding rings - What makes a diamond so important?

I would prefer an alexandrite set in platinum, or a morganite set in rose gold.

Thanks everyone for the well wishes and such! I was ambivalent about reviving an eight year old zombie but I’m glad the update was appreciated and that there’s some more conversation to be had on the topic.

IMO, the best arguments for the diamond were kittenblue’s comments about its durability and tendency not to clash with other articles. Those were very good points.

I’m lucky my fiancee shared my views on diamonds and practicality in general. Getting her ring size for the engagement ring was actually like pulling teeth. She was afraid that I was going to get her something expensive that she wouldn’t like, and she’d be pressured to like it anyway due to its cost. And then I go and get her an $80 silver ring engraved with the script she’s devoted most of her adult life to studying. It was a nice surprise for her.

On the other hand, if she’d had her heart set on a diamond, I’d have advocated for an estate sale, a lab grown diamond, or one that was tracked and less likely to have been involved in conflict transactions (I hear Canada sources some diamonds like that). As it was, the silver Linear B ring was a hit and she was totally on board with tantalum versions for the wedding bands. She even hand drew the symbols herself.

I can’t wait to get married to this broad =)

I can’t wait to get married to this dude! :stuck_out_tongue:

I’m not at high risk of buying a diamond.

I collect rocks and cheap gemstones that I’ve had since I was a kid, along with other junk. I still have it in my basement. I will never buy an engagement ring with a diamond. I would break of an engagement rather than supporting De Beers.

I prefer opals. And fossils, maybe that could be put into a ring. I know a few goldsmiths that make nice rings, mostly of steel I think. Steel is a great chioce! I also had a few used ring, and cheap silver rings with cats eye and turquoise, and they are nice. Or meteorite. Or candy rings.

If I ever should need to get a diamond, I will buy a fake, or maybe grow an alum crystal and coat it. They look really nice, if not really sparkling, but you have the satisfaction of doing it yourself. If someone wants me to go out and use a lot of money on junk, I’d suggest otherwise.

I’m not at high risk of marrying either, but there goes. Who knows, but I would not buy her a diamond ring.

De Beers is evil itself, and probably the worst company ever. Hopefully I’ll never have anything to do with that shit.

If you absolutely need a wedding ring, you can do whatever else than buying a diamond ring.

There are synthetic diamonds that are far more perfect than ones found in nature, and have been for years.

Though I think sapphire is plenty hard for most intents and purposes.

Hardly surprising they both had a sapphire - it’s the same ring.

I wonder how that went down - “here, have my dead mother’s engagement ring from her failed marriage”.

Coloured stones are actually pretty common in the UK - but almost always in conjunction with diamonds. This kind of thing.

Why do threads like this always devolve into reverse snobbery?

It’s actually the same ring.

Yes, but all those synthetic diamond manufacturers seems to have been bought up or co-opted by DeBeers, and they now (at least as of 2015) sell their diamonds at an adjusted scale - i.e., they list them as ‘synthetic’ diamonds but price them at about 80-90% of natural diamonds cost.

There is no getting around the DeBeers monopoly just yet.

Its hard to be a snob over the hardest substance known to man to have ever been pulled from an under-paid diamond miner’s ass.