That’s my guess. You can’t spend that much time around sketchy people with tons of money in the San Fernando Valley and walk out without a bad habit or two, can you?
He’s large, furry and inarticulate. Just like Ron Jeremy. 
Good point though.
Sorry Chewie.
How come **BrainGlutton **is the only one willing to give actual recommendations? It’s not against the rules to mention a name of a porn site. It’s only against the rules to link to one.
Are we trying to pretend that we don’t know about porn? Or is it that no here has seen a decent MILF video?
The OP should check out the M.I.L.T.F series if he hasn’t seen it yet. If anyone feels like paying $10 a month, check out Videobox.
I hate it as well when websites/producers forget about the ILF part. You just need to search better. Searching for good porn is especially challenging because less people are willing to talk about it.
Where are you getting your MILFs from? Too many of the ones I see seem to have implants, but other than that they’re very hot.
But then again I don’t mind realistic looking women. The airbrushed Playboy bunnies don’t do much for me. I like it real and raw.
VCO3. a belated welcome back, and I agree with you 100%. Misrepresentation in porn is a pet peeve of mine as well. When you click on a MILF site, you expect a hot 35-45 year old, not any older woman- just any old bag should go under the “older” or “Granny” section. Another problem is sites that don’t know the difference between “chubby” and “morbidly obese”. Or those who put anyone with dark skin under the “ebony” section, even if they’re just a very tan white girl. And don’t get me started for what passes for trailer park (any old white girl in overalls) or teen (30 year olds with ponytails) sometimes. I’ve literally seen the exact same girl in “black”, “ethnic”, “latina” and “brasilian” sections at different times. Someone needs to take them to task on this- IIRC a while back someone did on their putting someone on a boxcover who doesn’t appear in the movie, and they stopped that practice.
…trailer…park?
I was sure I’d seen everything, but that’s one I’ve missed.
Well, “ethnic” doesn’t mean much I guess, but how is black, latina, and Brazilain mutually exclusive?
Don’t they say that 90% of everything is crap? I assume p0rn’s the same way.
And if that’s true, then is the industry filled with doody p0rn?
Think of porn categories as a Venn diagram. One would expect some overlap between categories like “blondes,” “anal,” and “German girls,” for example.
Well, in that case the diagam might look a lot like a single circle. But you get the idea.
I’m sure there are lots of brunette anal German girls too.
No, porn is 99.9% crap; and what’s more, the producers of porn think it’s supposed to be that way.
Not to disagree with the OP, but I have two words on this topic:
Wifey’s World
Ron Jeremy is hardly inarticulate. He holds a Master’s Degree in Education and was teacher for over a decade.
My apologies.
Ignorance fought.
Cartooniverse
I believe the term you’re looking for is “scat play.”
At least for me, when I think of MILF I think of the likes of Megyn Price or Joely Fisher (or soon-to-be mum Courtney Thorne-Smith).
Anthing less than that is just naked ladies past their prime, it ain’t porn.