Esprix, tilting at strawmen again

Ooh! Now I’m a stalker and a troll!

You, sir, are a cad! A low-life ruffian! I am affronted! Affronted, I say!

Esprix

guess that makes you a stroller .

Affronted?
Now your a front?
I thought you were a top?

:wink:

You know, I would think if Esprix WAS going to stalk someone on the SDMB, it would definitely NOT be The Ryan.

I really don’t understand what’s so hard to understand about “Esprix misrepresented my position”.
Esprix has implied that I’ve said that bisexuality and pedophilia are the same.
I’ve never said that.
Esprix refused to clarify his statement, provide any support, or retract his statements.
What, exactly, is unclear about that?

Fucking hell.

I read through this whole thread, and through The Ryan’s posts (or are they “posts”? ;)) in the other thread.

I think it’s time for our monthly “The Ryan” staff “discussion”.

Is it my turn to “bring” the “cookies” this time 'round?

Actually, I attempted to aid in the discussion by trying to bridge the gap between what I believed was a misunderstanding between you and Esprix about the terms you were throwing around. Sorry for trying to aid in the discussion. And I will answer your question that it is not appropriate for Esprix to knowingly misrepresent your position, however, I don’t think he did. His interpretation, based on what appeared to be your mistaken assumption that there are such things as homosexual pedophiles, was one that could have been made, and rather than attempt to form a cogent, well-reasoned explanation, you preferred to go straight to defensive, incoherent ranting. It is, of course, your perogative, but, as you can surely tell, it doesn’t make you many friends. Or admirers. Or even acquaintences who can tolerate you.

Damn, Coldfire, that cracked me up!

Yeah. We’re going to discuss his posting “privileges”, which are not the same as his “posting” privileges, if you know what I mean.

It would be me. I know this because he follows me around, screaming “OOOOOOOooOOOkies!”.

I think I’ve been “misrepresented.”

Not that I said anything, but I am being “preemptive.”

Actually, what I meant to say was,

Damn, Coldfire, that “cracked” me “up”!

The Ryan “called” my post “weaseling.”

:smiley:

hee hee" hee"

(dont hurt me, mods)

I take it you mean “hurt” you? See, you need to “clarify” your “statement” as not to be “unclear.”

“What” “I” really wanted to “know” was why “everyone” is “using” “quotations”.

Is this “something” the “Ryan” does “often”?

That is a scurrilous… er, truth? :smiley:

Esprix

No, Esprix, it’s “truth”.

Is “this” thread “over”?

My pit thread is longer than Esprix’s.

Neener neener neener.

yes, only your pit thread is longer…:wink: