[QUOTE=NDP]
How tall is Scarlett Johansson? I was under the impression she’s around 5’8" and that seems taller than the woman depicted in the photos who looks to be no more than 5’4" (especially in the previously mentioned bicycle shot).
[/QUOTE]
I’ve stood right next to her and she seemed about my height - 5’4" Certainly I wasn’t looking up at her. She has some impressive piercings.
Whoever said that the ‘mystery’ rack isn’t large enough, or the ‘mystery’ woman is too skinny to be Scarlett is insane. I don’t read the magazine regularly, but when I saw the bicycle shot a couple of months ago, she’s the first person I thought of. Based on all the other information, I’d bet the rent that it’s Scarlett.
[QUOTE=Waverly]
I’m not changing my vote, but upon re-assessing her height and curvaceousness, I agree she should be a possibility.
[/QUOTE]
Your vote is still with Kate Hudson? I assume you mean as your sexiest woman, not Esquire’s. Even post-baby, Kate has zits for boobs. No way in hell it’s her.
[QUOTE=Darth Vader’s Little Pal]
Whoever said that the ‘mystery’ rack isn’t large enough, or the ‘mystery’ woman is too skinny to be Scarlett is insane. I don’t read the magazine regularly, but when I saw the bicycle shot a couple of months ago, she’s the first person I thought of. Based on all the other information, I’d bet the rent that it’s Scarlett.
[/QUOTE]
Forgive me. Not all of us have had the pleasure of standing right next to her.
Well, to be fair to DVLP, I’ve never stood next to her, and when I read all the posts saying that woman is the “wrong body type” for Scarlett, and making guesses like Molly Sims and Kate Hudson, I wondered if everyone here is very, very stoned.
[QUOTE=WordMan]
Do tell.
[/QUOTE]
I dunno. She obviously takes them out for work-related stuff so it feels a bit invasive to publish her hole-pokes. Let’s just say I was rather shocked when I saw her, because she had a lot more metal in her face than you’d expect for a Hollywood starlet. It suits her, though. After all, she’s from New York.
I will dish that she was there with Josh Hartnett. Now he’s tall.
[QUOTE=DianaG]
Well, to be fair to DVLP, I’ve never stood next to her, and when I read all the posts saying that woman is the “wrong body type” for Scarlett, and making guesses like Molly Sims and Kate Hudson, I wondered if everyone here is very, very stoned.
[/QUOTE]
No kidding.
While Scarlett is being touted by media as being curvaceous and perhaps Rubenesque, look at who she’s being compared to. She’s still relatively thin compared with the standard population. Last I looked it up, she weighed in at 115.
I’m going Scarlett too. The question about people having trouble spelling her name ruled out several candidates and I just think that’s her profile shaving her legs.
While Scarlett is being touted by media as being curvaceous and perhaps Rubenesque, look at who she’s being compared to. She’s still relatively thin compared with the standard population. Last I looked it up, she weighed in at 115.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, she is actually quite tiny in person (from those who too have had the pleasure of standing by her). But she does have the rack. Sometimes the media confuses big boobs with being plus-sized.
[QUOTE=photopat]
I’m going Scarlett too. The question about people having trouble spelling her name ruled out several candidates and I just think that’s her profile shaving her legs.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, the lips look like her pout.
[QUOTE=Darth Vader’s Little Pal]
Your vote is still with Kate Hudson? I assume you mean as your sexiest woman, not Esquire’s. Even post-baby, Kate has zits for boobs. No way in hell it’s her.
[/QUOTE]
That’s just not nice. Kate looks good in the photo no matter he breast size.
I said ealier that the publicists would decide who wins, so yes, I’m not so much voting as expressing a preference.
&seq=4){kind=link}
