I just want to quote this again since it’s brilliant. It’s what I’ve been trying to say the last four posts or so, only far better put.
Scum would obviously know my 180 degree turn on NAF wouldn’t be scum oriented. So they’d most likely figure it came from something else (me finding out some kind of info that made me change my mind–I.E. an investigator of some sort).
So those who asked me questions that appeared to be “What info did you get that NAF is telling the truth?” are more so on my radar than others.
Guiri asked this almost verbatim in post 1220.
Quote: “Apart from his claim, do you have any reason to believe he no longer has the book?”
TO ME, this reads like a very subtle way to ask if I was given any info or if anything happened, overNight, to make me change my mind.
To be more specific, it’s something I can see scum asking if they THOUGHT I was an investigator and wanted to gauge my answer/reaction to more or less prove or disprove their guess.
For some reason, Telcontar doesn’t think this is, IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, fishing…which I think is being deliberatally obtuse. It certainly could be fishing. And saying it’s not is being, at best, delusional.