Obviously I disagree. I don’t feel it was overused. I think the way Whedon kept having different characters make the joke was what made it work. Having different characters participating in the same inside joke quietly illustrating how close the team had gotten. It made it obvious that they hung out together and talked between the onscreen scenes without belaboring the point.
Did you find Avengers: Age of Ultron as consistently engaging and entertaining as the original Avengers? Because if you did, you are (in my experience) in the minority. Avengers was Whedon in peak form; Age of Ultron was Whedon in formulaic mode, which even he admitted to being creatively drained by the process along with all of the other work and doubtless some script doctoring he was doing for the other MCU films and the lackluster Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
I look forward to future good work from Joss Whedon; he’s certainly demonstrated that he is capable of it, especially when he has full creative control of a project. But Age of Ultron does not reflect that, either in the dialogue or plotting. It’s a fairly by the numbers and neutral flim only occasionally punctuated by the kind of wit that is usually a highlight of his other work.
Cap: …but if you put the hammer in an elevator…
Stark: It would still go up.
Cap: Elevator’s not worthy.
Thor: I’m going to miss these little talks of ours.
I’d imagine that despite the credits, most shows had input from all the writers. So that line may well be a Whedon line. Or, conversely, half the lines in this thread may actually be Espenson lines for all we know.
I gotta say Joss’s shows are responsible for a good bit of my favorite lines (Aaron Sorkin’s created a bunch too) but my all-time favorite bit of dialog is this scene:
From* Buffy*
Willow : He said he wasn’t coming back until he’d driven to all fifty states.
Buffy : Did you explain about Hawaii?
Willow : Well, he seemed so determined.
No, I don’t feel the second movie was as good as the first one. But I also don’t feel it was as bad as you seem to.
May I ask how many times you saw it? Personally, I found it worked a lot better the second time I watched it. The first time I watched it, it seemed chaotic and unstructured. But the second time, I knew the overall plot going in and I noticed it actually held up pretty well with a lot of apparently meaningless details that fit together to support the story. So the structure is there.