Yes, you’re still proving that you can’t discuss the actual facts. As I pointed out at the time:
The question was not whether Clinton had made specific demands about anything at all ,(e.g. “housing” or “a commitment to peace”) but whether there had been specific demands as to how the peace process would proceed. Your fallacy of equivocation was not, in fact, an answer. And you’re evidently too stupid to understand that.
If you weren’t frothing mad all the time and obsessed with my job, wife, girlfriends, IQ and education, you might even realize that the fallacy of equivocation is not a factual refutation.
So, you frothing liar, care to address the other comments I quoted that show that you froth about the Middle East in full on rant mode to the point where the mods have to slap you down?
And Jesus, you really are obsessed with me, aren’t you? Now you’re crawling through my photobucket account because you’re obsessed with how I look? So, on a scale of one to ten, with ten being not knowing who I am and ten being lurking outside my house in the bushes, it’d be safe to say you’re roughly an 11.5?