As a Yankees fan (not the most ardent fan any more, but I still care enough to watch come post-season)…
I don’t have a strong opinion as to whether Joe Torre should be retained as manager. I can honestly see arguments both ways.
PRO TORRE:
He keeps a talented team on an even keel, which is important in seasons like 2007, where the team got off to a rocky start. The players like him and they’re comfortable with him. And the team makes the playoffs every year, so how bad could he be?
ANTI TORRE:
He’s a mediocre strategist, at best, and his decision making leaves a lot of people scratching their heads. And while he does a good job keeping the team relaxed, he doesn’t seem to have any real motivational skills.
So, I’m okay with keeping him OR releasing him. He’s neither a great manager nor a horrible one. It’s fine by me if the front office decides, “We’re not a terrible team, and we’ll be just fine if we reload on pitching,” and keeps Torre. It’s ALSO fine by me if they decide, “Torre’s been a good guy, but it’s time to go in another direction.” Great, let him go and bring in a proven tactical genius or a proven motivator.
But… all indications are that Torre’s replacement would be Don Mattingly. And while I loved Don as a player, it’s hard to see how he’d represent an improvement for the Yankees!
Is he a better tactician than Torre? Nobody knows. Is he a fiery guy who’ll motivate underachievers? No, not really.
So, why hire him? Because they want to change things… but just a teeny weeny bit??? Because they want to shake things up, but not TOO much???
My feeling is, they should either keep Torre or make a REAL change. A switch to Don Mattingly doesn’t accomplish anything useful.