What the fuck, shitstain? If you’ve been reading enough of her posts to be annoyed, and you had a basic level of reading comprehension, you’d clue into the fact that Kaitlyn is a woman, and your knuckle-dragging use of quotes all over the place just shows what a fucking hypocrite you are for demanding proper thread etiquette.
Sounds like “paulberserker” has some deeper issues “he” needs to deal with. I wonder what “he” is really offended by – a transsexual lesbian crashing a straights-only thread, or the fact that there really are transsexual lesbians out there, and “his” being uncomfortable of that doesn’t matter one fucking bit, and there’s not a damn thing “he” can do about it.
And since “one-trick ponies” get on your tits – I’m a homosexual. Knock yourself out.
Yeah, I’ve ansered this before, but I really don’t minde polite questions.
The state of Texas does not recognize the legality of sexual reassignment, so even after I have my SRS and change my legal status to female on my birth certificate and federal papers, I’ll still be male in the eyes of Texas, Kansas, and Florida, but female to the Federal government and everywhere else. The fortunate part of that is that since I’ll remain legally male, the DOM statute doesn’t come into play and my marriage to Mrs. Six remains intact.
This means that in TX, same-sex marriage is legal for homosexual transsexuals, but illegal for heterosexual transsexuals. I can be married to a woman, but not to a man.
This will create a bizarre state of affairs in which I’ll be legally male some places, female in others, and some states will recognize my marriage, while others won’t. To the Feds, IIRC what my lawyer told me, I’ll be married and female.
Wait. Kaitlyn, you are still and will always be (unless the law is changed) legally male in Texas? So, if you and Mrs Six were to divorce, you could marry her again in a big old church wedding right in the heartland of Texas? And no-one could stop you? You, an obvious woman to any observer, could legally marry another woman right bang smack in the middle of Texas?
Can’t you do that? Please? Christ in a cartoon, it’d be fun.
Texas has actually attracted some homosexual transsexual couples precisely because of the way this law works, so what you’re describing has happened, though quietly so as not to attract unwanted attention.
And I would absolutely love to be the bride at a big fancy wedding. We’re actually considering doing that for our fifth wedding anniversary next year. We were married in Korea, and my family didn’t get to be at the wedding. I recently reconciled with my father, so most of my family would be able to come if we decide to go through with it.
My reaction to reading Kaitlyn’s first contribution to the poll thread in question - my reaction at the time she wrote it, as I was following that thread yesterday - was “Oh, no, not again!”. In other words, pretty much in line with the reation paulberserker had, if I understand him aright. I didn’t take Kaitlyn’s initial contribution as a joke, first because it didn’t seem like a joke and second because (apart from in the flirting and photo threads) Kaitlyn strikes me as a serious, even earnest, person. I did on the other hand smile when I read paul’s comment (echoing Kaitlyn’s “have a right” comment to get right back at her).
My own feeling is that Kaitlyn is determined to use every opportunity to state and restate that she’s a woman. Given this, I can understand paul’s use of inverted commas for “she” and “her”. After all, if I went on about my masculinity all the time and someone started referring to me as “he” and “him”, it would be quite an effective and amusing way of making a point.
So, in a way, Kaitlyn can’t have it both ways. If I (who’s a man in a man’s body) am fair game for jokes using inverted commas, then so is Kaitlyn (as a woman in a woman’s body). Additionally, I don’t like the way people are jumping on the inverted commas thing as if it’s a kind of shibboleth. Anyone who does that MUST be a transsexuo-phobe. That is incredibly superficial - not to mention judgemental - as well as being a cheap trick, acting like a banner behind which the masses band together to mindlessly flay the offender.
I like Kaitlyn, I admire her strength and courage, and her single-mindedness, and also her willingness to come right out and say she’s wrong when she is. I know little or nothing about paul. But I gave a little “Hear, hear!” when I read his first post to that thread, and I wanted to explain why.
Which you’re not, and no-one has said you are except you, so it’s kind of a weak argument. I also think that it would be a rather weak way of poking fun at this hypothetical constant reaffirmer of masculinity.
Either way, it’s more hurtful to do it to Kaitlyn as she was born in a male body.
When quote marks are used around an ordinary word in its ordinary context, that is to imply doubt about the accuracy of that word, or to set aside its usage as being something out of the ordinary. At least in this country. In that post, they were used to imply that ‘she’ is not a she. You’re allowed to not like us jumping on it, but he deserves it.
With a screen name of “Kaitlyn,” I assumed she was a woman because of her screen name, just as I’m sure other people not intimately acquainted with her other posts do as well. And, honestly, no matter how she got to where she is, a simple “I’m a gay woman.” is a sufficient enough explanation for me. Why her entire history had to be brought into the thread, and this one as well, is a mystery to me.
Nothing like dogpiling is there? I saw that post I made the original pitting about, and took it as sheer arrogance in a ‘I’m fuck all to do with this thread but i’ll throw in my 2 cents anyway’. I don’t particularly wade through 6 page flirting threads just to find out 4-5 posts of Kaitlyn & Priceguy jokingly flirting.
I also wish people would learn how to fucking read. What Kailtyn is, I couldn’t care less, it just seems to me in all the posts i’ve seen her make since her name change its blah blah transgender blah blah mrs six blah bah whatever except the comic threads i’ve seen her in. Thats what i’ve seen.
But hey, carry on. Seems plenty of you love to jump in when its a piece of piss to pile on. I stand by what I said in my OP, if you read it. Because it’s fucking correct for the point i’m making.
Now, here we go with WAAAAA no its not for another fuck knows how many posts. I don’t see what the fucking need for people to try and guess what my attitudes are to people of a different sexual orientation/gender to me either. People are either alright, or wankers. I don’t give a fuck what they are, it comes down to that with me.
