Always good to see a new poster with moxie! And spunk-- lotso spunk-- spray that spunk all over the boards, whydontcha?
First time I saw your spunky moxie in this thread I said to myself-- Self, you should give this new poster a big high five for grasping the essence of all Dopers with this fine assesment:
If you put enough sexually frustrated, celibate losers together, a few of them are going to end up mating. It’s inevitable, it’s a numbers game.
(Incidentally, that’s why the member testimonials published on dating sites mean practically nothing.)
but then I saw Scotticher had done a fine job of doing it without risking the censure of our MPSIMS mods as I sure would have done.
Then I happened upon what you believe to be the answer to the recent 1920’s Death Ray phenom that has swept this board like some crazy catchphrase fever (only more repetitive) :
Why, you’re so full of moxilated spunk that you just dive right in and tell the members of this messageboard all about ourselves!
And you are just the poster to do it too. Why just look at all the sage advice you spunkilated in this thread!
She’s just screwing with you by giving you mixed signals. Retaliate. Leave her a vaguely affectionate voicemail message, then later let it percolate to her that you’re dating someone else (whether true or not), tell her how much you value her friendship, and so on.
and
I still advocate playing mind games. It doesn’t matter whether you normally play them. You have to play them now. The girl is obviously playing them, and you need to play up to her level if you want to so much as stay on the playing field. If you play like a stupid naive kid and act all honest and direct (like mama taught you) you’ve lost the game before you even started playing.
Women crave excitement and mystery. You need to appeal to this side of her (by sending mixed signals) if you ever want to have a chance of having her feel passion for you. Otherwise you’ve already lost.
I think it’s wonderful that a person with such a worldview could stop here and hobnob with all us losers, geeks and nerds. Again-- Thanks!
There are some gems from Giggle Gaggle in this thread , too.
If these girls weren’t selling images of their boobies in exchange for a t-shirt, they would be selling a multiyear lease on their vaginas to the groom in exchange for a big rock, a lavish wedding, and half of his assets after the inevitable divorce. I don’t see a morality differential between the two arrangements.
Check back with me the day women stop treating their own bodies as an asset that must be monetized under a rubric of artificial scarcity designed to inflate its value. I’m not holding my breath on that one.
Women have sole decision and veto power when it comes to initiating sexual congress. They use this power to extract favors, money and upward social mobilization from men, often lacking in all relevant merit except ownership of a vagina.
No wonder men are bitter.
I was seriously considering pitting this wank (and I’ve never pitted anyone), but figured I’d leave it to more capable hands.
Good pitting, but you missed a couple:
Look, this messageboard is about fighting ignorance. It is not about regurgitating counterproductive, dishonest, and outright fallacious feminist propaganda. I’m telling the guy what works and what gets results, which I believe is the entire point of this thread.
But I have to admit that his claim to be “fighting ignorance” is one of the funniest things I have read on this board, so maybe we should keep him around for comic relief.
DNFTBL
(Do not feed the bitter losers)
*Originally posted by Biggirl *Scotticher had done a fine job of doing it without risking the censure of our MPSIMS mods as I sure would have done.
Just thought you’d like to know, darlin’…it was a close thing. Thank the good God for preview and memories of recent temper loss. I previewed and then stepped slowly away from my computer whilst allowing my boiling blood to cool down. Then I edited my original post a GREAT deal. I am seriously not kidding. A GREAT DEAL…
Can’t figure why he’d want to hang out with us celibate losers. Maybe he’s looking to dominate us and become our overlord?
I think he just got dumped by too many girls, hence the bitterness and female-bashing. Maybe we could get him the number of an escort service near him, somehow?
county
August 30, 2003, 10:47pm
9
Now, Now, your team has some embittered players also.
mhendo
August 30, 2003, 11:36pm
10
Well, at least this one-trick pony has managed to hang around long enough to have a Pit thread devoted to him.
By contrast, this moron managed to get banned after 12 posts, then came back again under a (slightly) different name and get banned after 13:
G.I. Joe
Gastrointestinal Joseph (get it?! get it?!)
Does anyone else here think this guy sounds like a sexually frustrated, celibate loser?
Wow. He has got balls.
Maybe they should be removed. sharpens ginsus
Curious thing is, it’s a really girlie user name; what (seemingly) hetro guy would think of ‘giggle’ ? . . .
county
August 31, 2003, 3:21am
14
Now Now, no need to bring the third team into play.
Ooooh!
Here are some new ones!
Women are attracted to experienced men, and men are attracted to chaste women, due to evolutionary reasons. For purposes of successful copulation, the two sexes require different qualities of one another. A woman wants a man who can become erect and impregnate her quickly and effectively, which requires experience at having done so over and over. A man, on the other hand, wants a woman who is not likely to be pregnant at the time – who has not had, or does not currently have, sexual partners – so his emission can successfully result in pregnany. These evolutionary urges may no longer be relevant in our age of cheap, widely available and effective birth control, but one cannot undo millions of years of evolution with thirty years of feminist propaganda.
If you take a survey among men regarding their first sexual experiences, you will find that the majority of them experienced some symptoms of erectile dysfunction in that first experience. The combination of an unfamiliar challenge and performance anxiety will cause any man difficulty in getting and maintaining an erection.
No cite on that one, despite repeated requests.
One values aged wine, but fresh fruit. This is because wine is not fruit.
One values older sages, but younger athletes. This is because sages are not athletes.
One values virginal women, but experienced men. This is because women are not men.
This guy is a one trick poney for sure. Women are EEEEVIL!
Are you sure this is a man?
mhendo
August 31, 2003, 10:12pm
18
I’m pretty sure, based on this post :
A decent relationship is one where I set the terms of the relationship.
It’s no trouble becoming friends with a woman I’m already fucking. Should I have inclinations in that direction, I can make that happen.
The reverse is pretty much impossible to achieve, for me, or for any man. The friends zone is a bottomless abyss from which there is no escape.
A man, and a moron.
Wow! This guy has some serious women issues (it’s the only topic he posts on). Now he actually equates non-virgins with “women who sleep around”
:
Except for statistically insignificant percentages of women who rupture their hymens while riding a bike (yeah, right) or women with superhuman superelastic superduper hymens, the two groups are virtually equal. Am I missing something?
(same thread as I linked above.)
Monty
August 31, 2003, 10:38pm
20
mhendo: That doesn’t prove it’s a man. Heck, it sounds more like “Bud” (Rudy’s friend) on the Cosby Show.