Gilmore Girls 11/28

There isn’t a thread up yet, so I’m guessing quite a few people have given up on the show like they said they would?

Anyway, I thought this episode was the best of the season. Lorelai is finally sarcastic again without being lame! I love the guilt trip that Emily and Richard laid on them. And I absolutely love that Chris was shamed for throwing his money around like a jackass. And it looks like Luke finally grew a pair and told Anna off. I guess seeing Lorelai and Chris together and holding his sister’s baby made him realise that being obedient to Anna’s every command on how to raise April made him lose what he could have had.

I thought it was a really great episode for this season.

What is up with the group of women at the end of each show discussing what we just saw? Does the CW network have such a low opinion of their viewers that they find it necessary to explain the episode’s plot and humor to us? When that woman gave the detailed explanation of the mandate/man-date running joke I almost threw my remote at the TV.

lars American Eagle Outfitters is the big sponsor for the CW Tuesday night shows. It’s a “creative” way for them to get ads in between the shows. They say creative, I hit the mute button.

I still watch the show, but I have pretty much given up on it. Yeah, it was good that Luke finally stepped up to assert his rights as a father. But too bad it took the birth of his niece to make that happen.

And Emily being a complete dick about the phone message that lorelei left was old-school GG. For the last two weeks, they’ve captured the spirit of the first years, but aren’t able to carry it past the opening credits.

When Christopher told Lorelei that he was the guy that everyyone liked, I yelled “Except for the audience!” I’m glad that Star’s Hollow is pissed at him. Maybe he’ll just stay in his room from now on.

Luke’s chances of gaining any custody of April would be negligible I imagine. I can’t imagine any judge would consider him a better parent than April’s mom.

But once she made it known (or allowed April to tell him - no real difference) that he was the father, he has certain rights. He’s not talking about taking her away from Anna, just shared custody after the move, and having her stay with him to finish out the school year. Even in Plotlineville, these are reasonable requests.

I would still think gaining custody for even that short of a time would be tough to get in Plotlineville.

The problem is that Anna wants to take her away forever. She wasn’t even ok with “spring break and part of summer vacation this year - not even on a regular basis” which is also reasonable and common on Plotville because then you don’t have to even show the kid - the entire visit can take place off screen.

If Luke is competent enough to take care of her for 3 months (which he was just shown to be), I can’t imagine any fictional judge on a nice show saying “She can move across the country and you have no visitation rights at all,” which is what Anna seems to want.

BTW, Anna’s behavior seems, well, crazy to me. Is that “my daughter - you may never see her again” in any way normal?

I think the woman just didn’t react well to Luke’s hardball negotiating. I can’t imagine that Stars Hollow will have a great attorney for him. It will probably end up being Kurt.

In some states, I think it’s generally not permissible at all for the custodial parent to move out-of-state without the permission of the noncustodial parent, unless a court finds that moving would constitute a very clear advantage to the child (and that an acceptable plan for visitation has been established). If Luke follows up, then I think it would be unrealistic for any judge to allow Anna to leave with no promise of visitation, especially since April (presumably) would want to see her father and Luke is a responsible guy with a steady job. Of course, that might mean child support, but I can’t see Luke objecting to that.

I do wonder why the writers have decided to paint Anna as such a cardboard cutout SELFISH EVIL BITCH. It would have made this plotline a bit more interesting to give her an admirable quality or two.

Maybe to make her a source of conflict for Luke (and Lorelei last season). Or maybe because the other character Sherryl Lee played on the show (the girlfriend of Jesse’s dad) was such a low-keyed California surfer girl that they wanted to make sure no one would confuse the two characters played by the same actor.

Gilmore Girls has really lost its way. I just got into the show last season, but I’ve been going to the local library and renting DVDs of the early episodes (the library here has all of the first five seasons!) The writing and characters have really taken a dive. I don’t fault the actors; they’re still fantastic. It’s just that they’re getting subpar material. They say “I love you,” f’Chrissake! Consider how Lorelai always had difficulty reaching inside and getting to know her own emotions, and how she always found herself botching relationships when she got too close. I know people like this; this is a very credible way to act.

Lorelai Gilmore was a unique kind of complex personality that you seldom see on TV. However, this season, she’s more reluctant with witty rejoinders, and seems to be more prone to let others get the upper hand in the back-and-forth verbal shooting matches that defined the show. Also, Luke seems to have lost his edge somewhat, as well. The world is beating him up right now, he’s losing absolutely everything, but somehow he comes off as less cross and less bitter than he was in the early episodes. I might expect his emotions to manifest themselves more in his quotidian behavior than they have been.

And Christopher! What does he do all day? I mean, I know he’s loaded and doesn’t have to work, but hell, he’s got to be doing something with his time, right? Even if he’s just gardening or surfing the net or something? It’s like they store him in mothballs and then just pull him out when it’s time for a scene with Lorelai. More, please!

It seemed like the story arc of the relationship with Lorelai and Christopher was developing nicely in the beginning of this season. They nearly tore each others’ throats out in the bathroom during the Friday night dinner, resulting from a difficult disconnect between the two of them that they had previously overlooked. Then all of a sudden they went to Paris and everything was swell, except for a marriage that Lorelai wasn’t so sure about. Next the stories are all about how Christopher needs to “get in with Stars Hollow,” as if that really means anything. What is this crap? Why do we need to focus on getting Christopher to be pals with Lorelai’s pals? Why not focus more on how their relationship isn’t working? Have them talk and realize they’ve changed too much since high school! Have them fight! Have Christopher make an ass out of himself in front of Lorelai’s friends! There are so many better ways to do this.

And for God’s sake: knock it off with the “I love yous.” That’s something that Lorelai would never say, even if she really, truly, honestly felt love. And I’m sure she does.

I don’t know who the yutzes are who are writing this show, but if they need someone who can do a better job, I’m available. I’d be glad to quit my job and write for Gilmore Girls, because even with this turkey of a season, I’m sure it can be salvaged.

Oh, and one more thing: the current head writer of the show has arranged for a special guest star to appear sometime this season. It’s a famous Hollywood director who just directed a movie that was released earlier this year, and he’s playing… himself! Barforama. The last thing we need is more Hollywood incest. Some writer inviting a director to play himself on a TV show that doesn’t exactly take place in Hollywood is such a lame idea. “We both work in TV! Or movies! Let’s give bit phat props to… ourselves!” They’ve come a long way from curiouser guest stars like Paul Anka and Madeleine Albright. Film people writing about film people is something I don’t care for at all. Yuck.

I’ll keep watching it, but my fiancée and I still refer to the DVDs of the earlier episodes as “real Gilmore Girls episodes.” Bonus: no Aerie Girls.

Well when she was introduced she was Lorelai-Lite. I’d joke with other fans that Amy Sherman Palladino only thought one kind of woman was interesting.
I’d rather her be a bitch about it than a non-character.

Luke is a succesful business owner, active in his community, no known criminal record and shown he can take care of April for extended periods of time. What judge isn’t going to grant him partial custody?

I wish Rory would grow some kind of spine. The moment Marty made that comment she should have looked him in the eye and said “You don’t say that.” Then got up and walked away.