Mods, if this should be in Cafe Society, please move it But it seems like a question witha factual answer out there somewhere, so …
Having seen a quite a lot of pornographic photos of naked girls using dildoes and vibrators on themselves and on each other, one question has been bugging me:
Why don’t they ever fully insert the thing?
I can look at a series of 100+ photos of the same girl(s) in the same scene, and 99% or the time the dildo never seems to be inserted more than an inch or so. What is the point of displaying a 10" dildo (or better yet, a 16" double-ended job) for the camera and then “wasting” 90% of it’s length? Hey ladies, you know, there’s a reason they make those toys with ridges and bumps covering the full length of the shaft!
Okay, I understand that the toy usually has the vibrating mechanism in the tip. But I’m afraid the vibrating effects just don’t translate in still photography. If the vibrations are the primary factor, wouldn’t it be more productive for the model to press it against her clitoris instead of inserting it into herself? In that case, a non-phallic-shaped vibrator would serve just as well.
Clearly, a penis-shaped dildo is used so that I, the viewer, can imagine my penis in place of the dildo. But if it was really my penis I, like most men, would be trying to penetrate as deeply as possible. So why not enhance this fantasy by fully inserting the dildo? I can certainly understand a first-time model being a bit shy about going deep in front of the camera. But not a model I’ve seen in dozens upon dozens of photo sets.
Is this simply a custom that has developed over time? Do the pornmongers worry that, if they depict full penetration with a dildo, their male viewers will feel threatened and replaceable? Does less-than-full penetration allow the models to preserve some delusion of chastity?
Help me out here.