Also, should MentalGuy get lynched (either now or at some later point) and flip scum, I’d be inclined to take a harder look at Mahaloth, given the state of the votes when MentalGuy switched from septimus to Pleo.
(That is, at the time that MentalGuy switched to Pleo, Mahaloth was the only votegetter close to Pleo – with 5 votes to Pleo’s 7. MentalGuy’s switch could plausibly have been an attempt to provide a bit of a cushion.)
I think Pleo’s (slightly odd) point is that when he claims vanilla at the beginning of the game, it’s done in order to confuse scum. Since he was scum in Hotel of Heroes, he would accomplish nothing by claiming vanilla, and thus did not do so.
(Of course, this overlooks a number of considerations – not least that if Pleo only claimed vanilla in games where he wasn’t scum, it’d be pretty easy to figure out that he was scum in games where he didn’t claim…as Mahaloth kept saying on the spoiled board for Heroes. I know Pleo is smarter than that, though, so I assume that Heroes was just a one-off blip in his strategy.)
So, ed, you agree with Drain that MentalGuy’s post was “bar none the scummiest thing that has happened so far in this thread,” but you’re not switching your vote?
Not that you have to, obviously; it just seemed odd.
Before **MentalGuy’s **post, the vote was:
pleo 8
maha 5
astral 3
mental 0
In the initial flurry, 3 people changed votes from **Pleo **to MentalGuy, and one person who had just recently unvoted **Pleo **voted for MentalGuy, making it:
pleo 5
maha 5
mental 4
astral 3
And after **septimus **and **Astral **voted:
Pleo 5
Mental 5
Maha 4
Astral 4
It seems like the ‘winner’ here is Pleonast. Though he’s still tied for the lead, his lynch is suddenly far from certain, and the tiebreaker procedure strongly favors a ‘no lynch’ outcome.
So…is MentalGuy
Town, jumping on the bandwagon against Town Pleo, and failing miserably at it? Scum, jumping on the bandwagon against Town Pleo, and failing miserably at it?
Scum, jumping on the bandwagon against *Scum *Pleo, and failing miserably at it?
or
Scum, *intentionally *failing in order to draw votes onto himself, and off of Pleo?
Of your options, I’m inclined towards #2 or #3 at the moment. And between #2 and #3, the former is more likely statistically and makes a bit more sense.
I found your claim and you voting stance to be null tells, but it’s posts like these that make me think you are Scum. Of all the things said in the 40 posts since **MentalGuy’s **vote, this was the only thing you found worthy of comment? You felt the most important thing for you to say was to point out that my *joke *was not quite solidly based in actual fact?