This thread is entirely gratuitous. Like most pit threads, it could have been avoided completely. But Anthracite petitioned me so kindly in this thread:
So here it is. I am Anthracite’s most humble and obedient servant.
I don’t know Guinastasia from Eve. Nevertheless I feel her bereavement. As a cat co-dependent myself, I understand the deluge of suffering caused by the loss of a loved companion.
Now I would turn to my objection to Anthracite’s remarks and then her own hasty and illogical replies.
To summarize, Anthracite suggested that **Guin[/s] take refuge at her own message board after some trollish comments were made here.
In a thread lamenting the loss of a dear animal companion, this struck me as questionably appropriate for two reasons.
First, why did Anthracite have to resort to a “wink wink nudge nudge” manner of enticement? If Anthracite honestly thought she was behaving in an above-board fashion, why couldn’t she come out and say “come to the UnaBoard” already?
It is true, we cannot know that Anthracite was directing Guinastasia to her own board. But there is simply no reason to use obfuscating language if Anthracite were talking about the two other most likely forms of communication, email and the telephone. She would have simply said, “call me if you don’t want to deal with the trolls.”
Second, her suggestion smacks of profiteering, for lack of a better word. “Well, we don’t have trolls at my board…why don’t you come there?” I am not, of course, imputing any motive to Anthracite’s behavior. I am only commenting on how I receive her words.
I recall the outrage that traditionally accompanies the hijacking of funeral or obituary threads. I felt that this should be no exception. I felt no burgeoning indignation, hence I made a general inquiry to see if others interpreted Anthracite’s words in a similar vein.
Well, did you? Am I overinterpreting her comments? It’s certainly possible. Just say so now and I would gladly recognize my error.
Her reply is unnecessarily cutting.
It starts well enough.
Perfectly good reason. Why didn’t Anthracite stop there?
That is not my argument at all. It is an artificial extension and misrepresentation of my claim presented in the most inhumane light possible.
I cannot recall OpalCat foisting Fathom on anyone grieving in a funeral thread whatsoever, though it is more than possible that I missed one. I would tender the same comments to her as I did to Anthracite were that the case.
Well, just because it wasn’t a cold sell does not mean it wasn’t a sell at all. Case in point: I know what the UnaBoard, yet I do not believe I am a member. Mentioning it in such a context could draw the numerous others just like me to participating. Not that this is such a horrible thing, of course. But in a context of bereavement, I find it inappropriate.
What does my IP address have anything to do with this?
Search away. I would be very interested in finding out what my problem is, and any assistance you can lend would be gratefully appreciated.
I do now know her. I firmly believe that outpouring of emotion to people with whom I have no individual connection is just verbiage which trivializes the real emotion that her friends can express. I do not wish to “tax the servers” with self-serving malarky. Unlike some posters perhaps, I do not have to post all of my basic human feelings. I just try to live with them myself.
I didn’t attack you, Anthracite, I just asked if anyone else found your remark impolite and self-serving. There really is a difference. Just email her next time.
MR