[QUOTE=D_Odds]
I agree with Otto. Claire survived, but not due to Peter.
[/QUOTE]
How, then, would it have had meaning to Bennett when Ando and Peter mentioned the thing about saving her at homecoming from Sylar? That appeared to still have happened in this timeline.
So it would seem that Peter saved Claire in this timeline.
And yet, Future Hiro says that he stabbed Sylar, and Sylar regenerated.
Well… this can’t be a single consistent timeline, right? Or else Future Hiro wouldn’t be surprised to see Present Hiro in Mystery Sock’s apartment. Because he’d remember that meeting, because he’d already experienced it from the other side.
It’s like in Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure (which, IIRC, is one of the few movies that handles time travel intelligently) - in the beginning, you see Bill and Ted meeting their future selves, and their future selves say “oh, woah, cool, I remember this!” and the present selves are confused. Then, later in the movie, the characters become those future characters, and go back, and now you see the same meeting from the perspective of the future Bill and Ted, and it makes sense why they remember it.
So if it was one consistent timeline, Future Hiro should say “oh, great, you’re here, I’ve been expecting you”, which he certainly doesn’t.
Which is a shame, because the single consistent timeline time travel story, while hard to pull off effectively, is really the only fair way to do it. Every other method is kind of an arbitrary gimmick.
Could it be kind of like 12 Monkies where
the main characters think they know what caused the disaster, and therefore try to stop it in the past? But it turns out their information/understanding was incorrect - they were chasing a red herring, and so their actions had no effect on what had occured. Because it’s a single consistent timeline, what they’d tried had actually been part of the original timeline, so they when they went back to the past, they were just performing the same actions they already had originally. Nothing changed, their actions were always part of the original timeline.
So how that applies here is that perhaps Future Hiro’s conclusion that Sylar has to be killed is a red herring, and won’t have any affect on the bomb. Or perhaps it somehow actually makes the bomb incident come to pass. And whatever Present Hiro does now, he may feel he’s trying to do something different, but he’d end up doing the same things he did originally/has always done. Meaning that in Present Hiro’s timeline, the bomb is still going to go off.
If we were working with a single consistent timeline here, it would be just like 12 Monkies. Hiro thinking he had to save the cheerleader, and hence, be able to kill Sylar would be equivelant to Bruce Willis’ character thinking that he could stop the plague by stopping the army of the 12 monkies. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem that’s possible that that’s the case, if Future Hiro never went through the Present Hiro/Future Hiro meeting from the perspective of Present Hiro.
I’m not even sure the writers know exactly where they’re going with this, because it’s hard to make sense of it.
Ultimately, I think the only really satisfying way to handle a story like this and not feel like it’s cheating is to cleverly construct a single consistent timeline. That doesn’t seem to be possible here, from what we know.
So, then, we’re having to work with multiple timelines (in seperate universes, or what?) where the Hiro from one timeline can interact with the Hiro from another. It’s hard to find a storyline like that satisfying.