HILLARY, the fat assed phony

manny]quote]So John, I put it to you. Is Jerry Nadler’s ass too large for politics?
[/quote]

I’m glad to address a serious question for a change. Nadler’s ass has to be big in order to represent the West side of New York, where Zabars is located, my favorite store in the world. There is a debate now going on over here on the East side whether Nadler or Nita Lowey has the larger ass and how that will impact on apportionment. One can only imagine what things would be like if Hillary Thunder Thighs gets elected. We are already over-represented in the blubber department in NY, thankyouverymuch.

Thought Tom Dwane was your Representative?


Pas grande chose.

John John wrote:

Ah, but that’s an old pic. I don’t look anything like that any more.

Believe me when I say to you,
I hope the Big Butts love their children too…"

Honest, Mr. Game Commissioner, sir, I SWEAR he jumped into my boat when I wasn’t looking! I wasn’t trolling, HONEST. Besides, I wouldn’t keep anything THAT small (brain-wise).

Honestly, Johnny how does someone with your mental impairment survive the mean streets of NYC? You got a body-guard? Does your wife hold your hand and make sure you don’t go after bright, shiny objects? Ever play three-card monty and wonder why you lost? How often have you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? Or the Statue of Liberty?

Did you ever try to take the subway to Boston? (“Hey, they’s subways here and they is subways in Boston! I bet they is CONNECTED!” drool)

When they were making Godzilla, did you go over and see if you could get the monster’s autograph? Were you disappointed when they said he was in his trailer and didn’t want to be disturbed?

BTW, just because those cops were found not guilty does NOT mean they were innocent. I bet you think the cops that beat Rodney King were innocent, too. (It happened a few years ago, here in L. A. It was in all the papers. You may have heard of it. No, it was RODNEY King, not LARRY King.)

I notice you don’t read the New York Times. Why? Do they use too many big words and not enough pictures? “Honey! What does ‘eh-juke-ay-shun’ mean?” “Oh, God, John, I told you not to read the Times. You’ll hurt yourself.”

If you EVER had an intelligent thought, it probably died of old age trying to find its way out of that dark, dank, cockroach-infested, dreary maze that is the inside of your head.

'Bye, now. And have a NICE day!

(Ooh, that was fun.)


>< DARWIN >
__L___L

No, it’s not the big words and lack of pictures he doesn’t like, it’s the lack of infantile name-calling. That seems to be his way of trying to argue a point.

John John, you and I disagree on this issue completely, but I think that you need to lay off the insults because it makes you seem like you’re just trying to grab at anything to have a negative opinion of Hillary. If you could just state (in a mature, rational manner) why you think she shouldn’t be our senator, then maybe people will at least listen. But all we hear is “fat ass”, etc. and ignore your (perhaps) valid points.

If you want to have an intelligent argument, have it, if not, then just name call and leave it at that. But don’t expect anyone to give your opinions any credence.

BTW, is anyone picking on the physical attributes of any male political candidates?? That’s what bothers me the most–men who attack women based on their looks. It’s just another way for men to shove our faces in the dirt.


“Don’t look at me–I’m irrelevant.”


dewaholic

Yes.

Pas grande chose.

Ah, Jab, er, um, did you say anything about Hillary Grand Cheeks Clinton? Must have missed it.

Question to you, Jab: why do you think Mrs Clinton’s ass is so big and ethics so small? Do you think her butt spread out from sitting on it, instead of working?


Pas grande chose.

Sounds like gym time, partner. Does the new beau like big rears? Start jogging, Bill.

Pas grande chose.

Wendell wrote, very early in the thread:

And I can’t believe I read 206 posts today trying to find SOMETHING further incisive about the OP.

But I did and I couldn’t.

Well well well, what an interesting thread! I love a good fight when it’s fair, but jwg and John John you are picking a battle of wits with those who are unable to defend themselves ;).
Gosh you guys are telling the truth about Lard Butt. Shame on you!

You are constantly harping on “what has blubberbutt done? what has thunderass done? what has hillaryi’mthemoocowgod?” still it sounds like a broken record!

She has done a lot I tell you, a lot. Most of the information I have on her comes from the movie Hollywood did in her honor. You know the one? It was a sequel to The Lion King. Did you guys see it? Hillary! has done plenty.

Oh, the movie is called, The Lyin’ Bitch!

She has done plenty of stuuf and things, like the lies she told, and and the money she makes off of people she should have tried to help, and and, stuff like that: also she did a lot of things and stuff. She is a whale-ass and if I lived in New York City, oh, I’m sorry, I meant New York state, they do have a state don’t they, I forget sometimes, anyway, she is trying to help, let’s not forget how she tried to help us all with Health Care, anyway, if I lived in NY state I would vote for friggin’ HITLER! before I’d vote for Hillary! “The huge lyin’ bitch ass Clinton”!

And Tom, are you out of Meds?

giggle giggle
YOU GUYS ARE GREAT!!!

John John and jwg: Your talents are wasted here! I loved your comments!

Hope to read more, I laughed and laughed!!!

John John, my sig line is a quote from “The Young Ones”. It’s not an actual request.

And since you continue to argue your point in a childlike manner, check out my new sig. I think you’ll like it. :stuck_out_tongue:


Don’t look at John John, he’s irrelevant–and probably has a fat ass.

Talents?? I guess that’s the kind of comment I would expect from a student who likes “cool things” and “hottie guys”. Do you also hate stuff that sucks?

Why don’t you run along and listen to your Britney Spears CD or try to figure out which Backstreet Boy is the dreamiest, while you dot your i’s with little hearts.


Don’t look at John John, he’s irrelevant–and probably has a fat ass.

Sanclem

Did you also find it interesting that you could find no posts that told you how great she’d be for the Senate, or how great her credentials are, OR WHAT, if anything, she has EVER done? Hmmmm?

Do YOU know why Whale Butt Clinton came here to NY?

Pas grande chose.

Sanycane

LOL, it’s been a lonely struggle trying to defend the wonderful Empire State from the Lard Butt lovers, but it’s been rather easy too. Notice how NO ONE can tell you WHY she’d be good for NY?
Sandy, don’t be a stranger here on the "Harpoon the Mrs Clinton Whale Rear thread. We need more humor.

THAR SHE BLOWS! HUGE CHEEKS BREAK THE WAVES. IT’S MOBY BUTT HILLARY. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


Pas grande chose.

Dewaholic: I don’t think that we should be arguing why she does not deserve to be Senator - we should be asking why does she deserve it? She is not from this state. The framers of the constitution made it clear that each state should send someone (OK, two) to the Seante, or did they say the Senators should pick a state? It your opinion that the job belongs to her by divine right? and that we should simply acquiesce? Her Highness is gracing this state with her talents? We should be grateful and fall to our knees? What the hell is going on in your mind? Unquestioning loyality and blind obedience is what the Nazis counted on. It now looks like the Democratic machine is copying that philosophy. Hillary! is not the candidate from New York, she is the candidate of the Washington based political machine. New York happened to be convenient.

What does not belong and why?

Truth
Justice
The American Way
Any politician named Clinton

Anyone out there who can provide valid I repeat valid, logical arguments as to why Hillary! would be a better candidate than Rudy? So far, we haven’t heard from you. I wonder why. So far all you guys have done is attack her critics - typical, Clintonian evasions. I am ashamed of all of you.

And just for the sake of annoying you brainless, lemming-like Hillary! stooges, she still has a fat ass.

I’d tell you why Hillary would be a better candidate than Giuliani, but JohnJohn and his sycophants would ignore it the way they ignore everything else of intelligence.


><DARWIN>
_L___L

As long as Hillary Clinton or John-Boy or Ted Kennedy or I meet the residency requirements as written in the New York statutes, she and they and I are perfectly free to run for Senator there. Maybe you should work to change the statutes regarding residency. Write your representatives and the governor.

To be honest, though, her run for the Senate makes me nervous on those grounds ALONE. I mean, if she can run for Senate in New York even though she’s never actually lived there before declaring her intentions, then what’s to stop Newt Gingrich (for just ONE example) from coming here to California? I don’t know how long you have to live here to be eligible, but if the requirements are as lax as they are in New York, then ANYone can copy Hillary.

If Hillary’s ass is too fat (which I do NOT believe), then so was William Howard Taft’s. (I bet John John and his followers don’t even know who Taft was!)

Hey, John-Boy, how about providing us a link to a Hillary photo that proves how fat her ass is? Bet ya can’t do it. (Digitally-altered pictures DO NOT COUNT.)


><DARWIN>
_L___L

So you want a valid, logical argument, but you continue to hurl insults about her appearance–conduct that you should’ve left on the playground in grade school. Grow up.

BTW, go back and read my first post to this thread on page one. Apparently you missed it the first time. I never said she would be the best candidate we could find. I said she would be the lesser of the evils. She hasn’t shown us enough of what she can do yet. But has anyone besides her or Rudy stepped up? Until someone better comes along, I prefer her. And in my first post, I gave a good (IMO anyway) example as to what I thought was at least an effort on her part.


Mt. Dew habit kicked since 2/21/00!

John you screaming dickweed, godDAMN if you’re not at it again!

I give you a C++ on this one - you really need to grasp the fact that you’re not nearly as clever or as skilled a writer as you think you are, to pull off these little invented posters you keep throwing at us. We’ve seen too many of your previous incarnations to NOT effortlessly recognize you in disguise. (The “those who are unable to defend themselves,” and “Tom, are you out of meds” comments were particularly damning, John - they’re SO you.) Your writing style glows with the brilliance of a thousand suns…

The fact that our new friend Sandy became a member THE DAY AFTER I OUTED CYB ON THIS THREAD is merely I coincidence, right? And in Sandy’s ONE other post, “she” kicks Rainbowcsr in the nuts for being clinically depressed (i.e. you’re a whining wuss, get up off your lazy ass and quit your bitching). This type of comment is extremely typical of Cyberian54 (et al), who has a long-running record of completely dismissing such illnesses as bi-polar/depression as people faking it, or being lazy or weak or all of the above.

Oh, and that response from JohnJohn back to his new alter-ego Sandycane (you know, the one that likes hottie boys?), was truly a genius move of misdirection. Totally threw me off track. :::yawn:::


StoryTyler
“Not everybody does it, but everybody should.”

ShortStory, why not email Sandy and arrange for both of us to be online at the same time, to ease you paranoia? You really have an overactive imagination.

Since you never address Hillary Buffalo Butt I think it’s safe to assume you don’t know who she is, or even what the Senate is.


Pas grande chose.

Jab1

She makes us very nervous too. It’s just another example of the Clinton con and we’re weary of it.


Pas grande chose.