Doobeious
Please don’t feel rejected, Doobi,I prefer women. I am, however, glad you are doing well in school.
Doob, do you know who Hillary Rhino Butt is and what she is running for?
Pas grande chose.
Click here: 02/18: First Lady’s Tip Is in the Mail
Pas grande chose.
Whatever happened to not feeding the trolls? It’s clear that he hasn’t got any kind of serious point to make.
TomH, your trolling in the “Peace in Northern Ireland” thread was unsuccessful so now you are here to see what you can instigate. Bad show, old bean. Nasty business.
The point is, which escapes you because you are from London and not up to date on American politics, that Hillary Colossal Cow Butt Clinton, you might have heard of her husband Bill and the cohiba cigar?, is a fake and, as such, unfit to hold Office in America, or to represent the State of New York. You’ll have to get your almanac out and find out where America is, then look on the Eastern Seaboard for New York, while you’re at it, you might want to check out Yorktown. New York might be a tad familiar to you from English history books, we sent you chaps packing a while back. Here here!
Tally ho!
Pas grande chose.
I am. The topic (as most topics) has more than one side. There is the side presented by the ranter. There are are other sides presented by people as tangents to the original rant. There is the side in opposition to the ranter. Since you are simply interested in ranting and hurling insults, I have aligned myself along with those who choose to laugh at your ludicrous attempts to appear righteous in the midst of your vulgar rantings.
Unless you can provide me with a citation from the MB’s FAQ explaining how you “own” the thread, you simply look foolish demanding that I adhere to your agenda.
(Given your own occasional habit of attempting to hijack threads addressing Jewish issues, you are simply silly demanding that everyone toe your line, here.)
Tom~
So, Tedious tom, what is your take on this Hillary Generous Buns Clinton and her run for the Senate seat in NY?
Pas grande chose.
I tend to stay out of the politics of other states (in general, not as an absolute rule). I have enough to do worrying about clutter in the part of my life that directly affects me–such as watching the SDMB polluted by posters that need to make fun of other people’s physical characteristics, even if inaccurately.
As long as we are in the Pit, if I have to comment on asses, I think your obsession makes a much larger target than Ms. Clinton’s standard-sized-for-a-middle-aged-old-woman’s derrière.
Tom~
Opal: You still didn’t answer the questions. True, you don’t have to, but I suspect the real reason is you can’t. So there.
Manhattan: thank you for the list of positions held by Hillary!.
A list of positions held is a great way to judge someone. I know of someone who rose from very humble beginnings, was a wounded veteran, was a political party leader, author(and none of this ghostwritten crap either), formed a national group to better the young, certainly was the foremost figure of his nation’s civil rights and racial issues, and during the first few years of his administration, his country experienced a tremendous economic turnaround. At the very end of his career, he even demonstrated in a very personal fashion his committment to choice. (Opal - FYI - that was Hitler. You know, WWII, the bad guy with the stupid mustache - try the History Channel). Resumes can make any idiot sound good. You should see mine.
I must return to my earlier argument - a list of jobs held does not necessarily mean someone is qualified - and to be fair, not qualified. I think that even the Big Tipper herself is coming around to this position. HILLARY! is now trying to say that it was she who realy was the driving force behind (insert anything good that happened in the past 7 years here). She was the one who get welfare reform through - she personally. Nobody knew. (This would probably include all the members of Congress and the White House staff as well). She simply was the stealth politician. Now the big secret is out! What secrets will she reveal next? The Internet? (she really gave Al Gore the idea that led to his inventing it.) The stock market boom? Didn’t she sit next to Greenspan at Bubba’s first State of the Union speech - she really calls the shots! The Yankees winning the series? Who else but the lifelong Yankees fan! HILLARY!'s greatest failing is, it seems, her modesty. To paraphrase Churchill: she has a lot to be modest about.
As to any new politician not having a list of accomplishments, that is perfectly true. That assumes that both candidates have no history. If one does, and the other does not, then it is valid to look at accomplshiments. What if everything was a failure? What if everything became worse? If you were an employer, would you hire (for the same salary, of course) the guy who has a proven track record and a good resume, or the guy with a good resume?
Given the choice between Giuliani, who has a history of accomplishment in NYC, and HILLARY!, who has a history of ethical and legal questions, and no, repeat no, history of accomplishments, I would choose the goombah over the wasp bitch.
In honor of President’s Day, I would like to suggest the following:
George Washington and the Cherry Tree.
George: Father, I cannot tell a lie. I did it.
Giuliani: It was in the way.
Hillary: I don’t remember.
And she still has a fat ass.
Tantrum tom
[quote]
I tend to stay out of the politics of other states (in general, not as an absolute rule). I have enough to do worrying about clutter in the part of my life that directly affects me]/quote]
Wise rule for the uninformed, tom. You might want to add poking your nose into other people’s business and making uninvited evaluations on things you have scant knowledge of to your list of don’ts.
Pas grande chose.
Dexterous assessment, JWG. You know, what I find interesting about this fake, Hillary Round Bottom Clinton, is how she reveals herself and how some people just don’t seem to get it. She usually follows her passions, as she has in the past, by attaching herself to the causes that most concern her. One really needs to search her past as key to her future. Black Panthers, ACLU, Gay issues, Communists, Civil Disobedience to the Government, questionable profits in the market and the rest of the issue that JWG has already pointed out.
I guess one could safely say that Hillary Clinton’s ass is bigger than her accomplishments, um, by a factor of 100.
Pas grande chose.
John John and jvg: I despise Hillary Clinton as much as you do because it’s obvious that she has all the brains, nerve and courage of the couple.
However, by focusing on the size of her derriere, you completely invalidate your arguments.
Your foes in this debate are quite correct. The size of a person’s butt has nothing to do with that person’s ability to do well in office. Frankly, I worry more about the lard between a candidate’s ears than the lard in the candidate’s ass.
Anything posted on this MB is as much my business as everyone else’s. If you have something on which you feel other people should not comment, keep it to private chat rooms or e-mail.
I have never provided an evaluation of anything when I did not have facts to support my evaluation. (I’m actually better than some at supporting even my opinions with facts.)
If this sort of exchange is going to get your shorts in a knot, simply stop posting replies to my posts.
BTW, the successive use of “Tedious tom” followed by “Tantrum tom” is another strong similarity to Cyberian54’s posting style. And, while you may find me tedious, I challenge you to find any tantrum I have posted, (using the actual English definition of the word, “tantrum,” of course).
Tom~
Cybbie, you took the words right out of my mouth.
I wonder if you can discuss Ms. Clinton’s merits (or lack thereof) WITHOUT mentioning her fanny in any way, shape, or form? You think you can do that for us? Because, you know, it isn’t her ass that’s running for the senate… and almost EVERY post you’ve got on this thread begins AND ends with comments about her rear-end. (Your obsession is REALLY showing, kid. Aren’t you embarrassed?!)
You whine that people are not staying on topic (Hillary’s supposed phoniness), but you’re the worst offender… you just go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about her ass, and haven’t even gotten to an in-depth discussion of what’s so “phony” about her.
You obviously don’t have the balls to leave her freakin’ butt out of the discussion for three seconds. The question is, do you have the brains?
C’mon, Putz, I dare ya!
StoryTyler
“Not everybody does it, but everybody should.”
Brains, nerve and courage: despicable qualities indeed.
tomndebb’s self evaluation of his own posts.
Your “Self analysis” is as inacurate as Hillary Ballon Bun’s account of the Rose Law Firm billing records whereabouts, or how she made a 1000% profit in Commodities Market.
Pas grande chose.
tomndebb’s self evaluation of his own posts. Go figure.
Your self analysis is as accurate as Hillary Ballon Bun’s list of accomplishments.
Pas grande chose.
Yes, indeed, TomH, brains and courage can be despicable when accompanied by gross dishonesty and amorality. As C.S. Lewis once pointed out, great villians need some virtue to make them truly villainous. Hitler would not have plunged the world in war had he not been a political genius with a fair share of courage. Tamerlane and Genghis Khan would not have led their armies to slaughter had they lacked courage. The colonists who vanquished most of Africa and much of Asia succeeded partially because of brains and ability (look up Cecil Rhodes some time).
Also, Hillary’s politics are too far to the left for my liking.
However, let’s save the political arguments for Great Debates, shall we? I don’t want to interrupt the roasting of the dimwitted weasel who currently calls himself John John.
tomndebb’s self evaluation of his own posts. Go figure.
Your self analysis is as accurate as Hillary Ballon Bun’s list of accomplishments.
Pas grande chose.
Yes, indeed, TomH, brains and courage can be despicable when accompanied by gross dishonesty and immorality. As C.S. Lewis once pointed out, great villians need some virtue to make them truly villainous. Hitler would not have plunged the world in war had he not been a political genius with a fair share of courage. Tamerlane and Genghis Khan would not have led their armies to slaughter had they lacked courage and leadership. The colonists who vanquished most of Africa and much of Asia succeeded partially because of brains and ability (look up Cecil Rhodes some time).
Also, Hillary’s politics are too far to the left for my liking.
However, let’s save the political arguments for Great Debates, shall we? I don’t want to interrupt the roasting of the dimwitted weasel who currently calls himself John John.
I can’t help but notice that people seem to be defending HILLARY! against charges that she has a fat ass. Well, she does. I notice also that any thing else is ignored. I think you guys have more of a problem with it than anyone else. Being the graceful, generous 90’s (oops - 00’s) kind of guy that I am, I will be glad to avoid the all too obvious mention of her huge, fat, globular, cellulite riddled tapioca pudding ass if, and only if, you HILLARY! Goebbels wanna be’s will answer my questions over what is better for her involvement? She has specifically mentioned her work with the schools in Arkansas. What improved? I mean I could say I reached the rank of Captain in the White Star Line, and was given command of their newest and greatest ship and boy, woudn’t that sound impressive. And don’t bother with this stealth Hillary crap she has started putting out now. It gets down to resume vs resume and accomplishments again.
Over and above that, serious questions:
Can Someone Answer:
What were the percentage of women in her Yale Law School Class? I mean the real numbers, not I went somewhere elso ten years later and there weren’t many.
What was Hillary Rodham - I mean, Hillary Clinton, no I mean Hillary Rodham Clinton, no I mean Hillary Clinton, no, I mean HILLARY!'s ranking in that class? Was she first in that law school class? I just would really like to know - if the numbers are truly impressive (I get to decide) I will actually say someting nice without mentioning her fat ass.
When Ms/MS/Miss Rodham served on the Watergate staff, was she recommended for future government employement by her supervisor?
How about answer the germane questions without getting hung up over the fact that she has a fat ass? Really - you guys need therapy.