[QUOTE=Nzinga, Seated]
See, this seems to negate the spirit of gift giving, in my opinion.
If I am given a gift by a close friend or family member, then they already know I don’t drink. So for the purposes of this thread, I am referring to polite aquaintances that we don’t know well enough to know eachother’s habits and whatnot. It is precisely these kinds of aquaintances for whom manners were invented, I believe.
We are saying to someone we don’t know well, “Hey. Not only do I respect you as a fellow human being, but I think enough of you to want to show you that you are in my thoughts.” That is really what is going on, right? Why do we have to reject the thought? Can’t we just go ahead and accept the gift? The person really doesn’t care so much that you drink the wine as much as they care that you know you were considered.
If one is an alcoholic that honestly can’t bear the idea of having the wine in their possesion long enough to re-gift it, or give it out to friends, then I can understand them saying, “Thank you, but I really can’t accept that. I do appreciate the thought.” Or whatever.
But no one else should reject the gift in my opinion. Particularly not to make certain that the giver knows better what to give next time! And I also feel put off by the idea of telling the giver what they should do with the gift instead. (enjoy it or find a new home for it). That doesn’t seem right to me.
I like the idea of manners. I mean, I am no Emily Post, but I like the idea of what manners are supposed to stand for. I always felt it was a great way to show that you recognise the best in others and in yourself. Once you truly understand that, manners come naturally to the point where you may not know which fork to use (I sure don’t) but you do know enough to accept a kindness with a thank you.
[/QUOTE]
As I understand it, certain practitioners of Islam feel that cannot touch liquor (or the bottle it comes in) - and I would guess there are other religions (i.e. some Baptists) that would feel similarly - an alcohol prohibition isn’t THAT unusual. If I don’t realize you have that restriction, I - as a giver of the gift - would feel far more embarrassed if you took it and I discovered the prohibition later than if you just immediately returned it with “its a lovely thought, but I can’t take it.” I don’t expect people to go against their morals or ethics or religious beliefs for the sake of politeness. - To me its similar to serving a Hindu beef. I teach my kids that its polite when they go to someone’s house to at least TRY everything on their plate - but if one of them suddenly converts, I wouldn’t expect politeness (in terms of eating it) to rank above a religious prohibition (politeness in refusing it is to be expected.) (I can still get a pang of guilt over my ex husband feeding a friend of his a pie I made - the friend kept kosher - the pie crust was lard based)
Moreover, as someone who has been the recipient of “inappropriate gifts from men” - it is always appropriate to turn down jewelry from a married man trying to get in ones pants for instance.
So there are several reasons why rejecting the gift would be the more proper thing to do than accepting it. Etiquette is fine and good, but its not meant to trump your own ethics and morals.