Not necessarily-German has a far more robust manufacturing sector then us despite being an advanced country indicating it isn’t solely a function of automation. And of course, the American fusionist Right has no interest in “reskilling” workers or helping out devastated communities.
Trump has had tons of experience with working with business executives, corporate boards, labor groups, and negotiating business deals with hundreds of millions of dollars with both American and non-American companies. Also working with governments. He just knows how to negotiate win-win deals. People will want to work with him.
Also if you watch “The Apprentice” he is good at picking good people, motivating people, and getting his workers to accomplish things.
Now granted he needs to learn to watch his mouth. He’s not in Hollywood anymore.
Excuse me? Hillary has been Secretary of State, she has far more foreign policy and diplomatic experience than Trump. On Sanders you may have a point, but hes no where near as laughable as Trumps “oh yeah I have a plan for ISIS but its secret, I won’t tell you because then the bad guys will know”…
Secretary of State is a title, a position, but not an actual accomplishment. Neither is First Lady, Senator, Victim, or Martyr. You have provided the unwavering response to every question about her experience and qualifications. I find that very telling.
Sanders actually was a mayor, so he has executive experience. Clinton has some as Secretary of State, but from everything we’ve learned it doesn’t sound like she had much control over anything.
Well, for one thing, he would boycott the governing whenever he thinks people are being nasty to him. “Try having a one-man summit conference, Vladimir!”
I’m happy that you admit your argument is ignorant. It’s also nonsense. She did not have a deciding role in killing Osama bin Laden unless you are calling Obama incompetent. What on earth did she do in the State Dept. to increase exports to China? What climate change accords did she have anything do with? They were started before she was in office and haven’t produced anything yet, obviously you don’t know the difference between puffery and substance. If you can work on fighting your ignorance maybe you could come up with a single fact to support your otherwise baseless opinions.
Pay attention, I clearly mentioned “setting the groundworks for the eventual climate change accords.”
I think the examples showed that you do not know substance if it hits you.
So, lets be clear about how baseless your ignorance can get then, the points came from the article I cited, it was a paraphrase of Bill Burton and then a quote from Shumer.
So you were not even aware that your last dig was ignoring what I pointed at. To people that had, if not first hand knowledge, then better info that I ever had.
Of course, dealing the matter at hand, can anyone just picture the kind of cabinet Trump would come up with?
Just look at his current campaign manager [del]Jabba the Hutt[/del] Sam Clovis:
:smack:
Of course the other option is then that of him being a very evil guy that knows better but is willing to continue seeding ignorance to get a lot of the action that professional climate change deniers are getting. And a lot of it is going to Republicans in power.
As Trump is also in the same boat, Trump would indeed not care much if eventually the USA loses a lot when his cabinet dismantles any past efforts made to do the right thing about controlling emissions. He and Sam Clovis will make a mint.
I don’t have time now to explain the difference between an opinion and a decision to you. But this lack of knowledge on your part is clearly a problem for you.
See, this is why Trump gets so much attention. He takes the bullshit you provide as a cite and reduces it down to a few lines so we don’t all get bored to death.
Let me paraphrase:
“China is wonderful, the US is wonderful, Obama is wonderful, his vice president and cabinet are wonderful! We’re all wonderful!”
Yes, Obama laid the groundworks and she watched, and then she wrote her little book about climate change was all about her.
Haven’t been hit with anything yet. Maybe substance is another word you don’t understand.
Again that misunderstanding of what opinion means. Point to the accomplishment. If not for Hillary Clinton ________ would not have happened. There are some things, but they’re mighty unimpressive for a political insider over a 40 year career.
It is your opinion, but those items were brought because you accused me of not knowing that those items were “nonsense or ignorant”.
Turns out that they were not as you claimed, factcheckers and other reporters do not agree with your opinions.
So what you posted in reply was just puffery, nothing to contradict the points that Bill Burton, Shumer, fact checkers and others did.
Tap dance as much as you like but the reality is that everyone can see that you were also wrong with the silly idea that I made those points from ignorance, even after I also mentioned where they were coming from; so far from being ignorant, they are on the record as I found too, so the points stand indeed.
As pointed before, your opinion, that is not supported by smarter people than me too, and people that did check them also.
So the other point stands too, you claimed that the points were ignorant indeed (and you are still showing a very basic ignorant problem from the very beginning (they were not my points either). Remember what you claimed was that the testimony and records were ignorant or imaginary. Not likely as other more important people and reporters that did check told us.
Of course, that exercise was made because I wanted to see what this exchange was about:
And we know the answer now, no example from Clinton will be accepted as valid. And Tripolar just wanted to be happy with his ignorance.
So, nothing much there so I will stick to Trump and the fools he is walking with from now on. Because if anyone thinks the current Trump edition is just faking it, you guys need to be aware about the people he will help into more powerful positions if he gets elected.
but those items were brought because you accused me of not knowing that those items were “nonsense or ignorant”.