“Chelsea.”
What do I win?
A cookie. And the knowledge that you have provided a better answer to that question than any Clinton supporter, campaigner, or Clinton herself has.
On the contrary, the one that has nothing is you. Besides the examples already mentioned. Many health care bills also would not had happened that are benefiting many.
And everyone can see that you have no reply whatsoever to the latest examples of what Trump will most likely do. Really, it is the peers and sources that one is using now the best guideline of how the Trumpeter will rule.
Well congratulations. You finally found some actual substance by going back to 2008 and the election she lost to Obama. She actually did help write and sponsor some bills that actually became laws, and some people liked those bills.
So can you explain why that was so difficult for you to do?
Not until you can explain why you missed that they were not my points and they had support, IOW, not imagined nor ignorant points as you claimed first.
And stop pretending that nothing was posted about Trump also. IOW, let’s get back to subject.
You still don’t understand what an opinion is I guess. You kept posting opinions from people who think Hillary is great but didn’t offer any specifics. That’s just campaign bullshit, no different than Trump’s in substance.
You’ll have to tell me what you mean, there was a lot posted about Trump.
Specifics were offered then, as noted, useless only for you anyhow.
What I posted last about him already, specially regarding the people he walks with; showing how it is more likely the way that he will govern. But we already know that you are not willing to touch that with a ten foot pole.
Better to talk about pretending that your request was not fulfilled anyhow and talk just about Clinton, and not your “simpatico” Trump.
Trump does not care about the kind of people he is kowtowing to for support and for endorsements.
There’s no point in discussing anything with. Your opinions are not facts, they don’t show me anything. And you somehow you are under the impression that I am supporting Trump for president. That in itself speaks to the quality of your opinions.
Oh, and I saw your post in the other thread. You know the rules, you went Godwin, so you lose.
Meh, you are even on regarding how Godwin works. The rule is not about mentioning just Nazis but about losing your sence of proportion.
The fascist tendencies of Trump have mentioned before by others, so you are only showing more ignorance.
And that is ok if you do not want to discuss how ignorant you were about Arapio and other Trump henchmen. The medium we are using is not only for you, I post to teach others too.
Henchmen?
The most we could say is that maybe Arpaio is Trump’s Bill Ayers…
Let me know when Bill Ayers has the power to arrest minorities just for driving while Hispanic or Black. The power to investigate your enemies (even your own judges) And arrest or harass his enemies for political reasons.
Trump does want to follow the path of the bully with a badge.
Darn, coffee needs to kick in.
I tried to say that you should let me know when Bill Ayers has the power to arrest minorities just for driving (or even just walking, as Arpaio also abused the rights of legal residents and citizens that were not white with his roundups) while Hispanic or Black. The power to investigate his enemies (even his own judges) And arrest or harass his enemies for political reasons.
Trump does want to follow the path of the bully with a badge. While any violent and radical things favored in the past by Ayers were not ever supported by Obama nor he reported that he was going to follow his path.
Surely, every foreign policy success during a Secretary of State’s term owes at least some credit to that Secretary of State, no? I mean, I realize that there are a lot of State Department jobs that are basically just rewards of a permanent vacation to someone the administration likes, but the very top job isn’t one of them.
Sure. But that in itself doesn’t mean her contribution to any foreign policy success was significant. If she’s going to tout her experience as SoS she should be able to point at something that wouldn’t have been done by anyone else in her position. This could be something about foreign policy, or just the management of the State Department. But I wouldn’t try the latter if I were her.
Libya. Just look how well that turned out!
And, and, and… the RESET with Russia.
I mostly kid. I still think HRC will be an adequate president. Still too hawkish for my tastes but much less so then the Republicans.
Yeah, she can not claim to had done much different than Colin Powell
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/colin-powell-personal-email-secretary-of-state-115707
But I have to agree with Chronos, foreign policy success required first to restore all the damage the previous one had done, quite a task. That is why while Clinton did open Burma it was until recently a very iffy thing to claim as a success but recent news shows that the groundwork made before is paying off.