Amateur troll idolizes professional troll, story at 11!
You are either dumb or dishonest. Tragic!
If conservatives were threatening and actually burning down the place and beating people I’d be critical of the tactics as well. Inviting and withdrawing invitations based on what one wants to here is perfectly valid.
Or declare himself a prophet, find some disciples, make a new religion, become insulated from criticism, ???, profit.
WaPo is reporting he’s resigned from Breitbart. Poor, poor Milo.
???
Not sure what you’re talking about.
They would never doanything like that!
Of course, while democrats would try to disown such behavior, it does seem that conservatives are bragging about their violent attempts to shut people up.
Interesting that I open this thread about a vile little creature and find that the people most vocal in defending him and trying to explain his vileness are the same two or three Trump/Republican mouthpieces I see in every Trump thread trying to defend his vileness.
Says a lot about the type of people those particular posters are.
Sigh. I suppose that means we in the UK are getting him back.
It’s not fair that we have to take Milo and Piers Morgan back while the US gets to keep Craig Ferguson and John Oliver :mad:
Andy Borowitz reports that his only hope for a job now is in the West Wing…
I have bad news for any Milo hater out there.
He is not gone, and he will be around for a long time, and nobody has succeeded in getting rid of him from the public sphere.
I just caught the end of his press conference. I liked the bit where he said to the media “fuck you for that”, for their fake news reporting and lies about him.
It is obviously a politically motivated character assassination attempt towards a gay person that they don’t like.
His book will still be coming out this year. There are plenty of other publishers that will be willing to publish a successful book that will sell many copies.
And his college tours and other talks will also still continue. And there is already funding in place with more to come for a new outlet where he will be able to continue his work.
Milo will be around for a lot longer than his opponents are and his fame, success and popularity will only further rise as a result of this assault on a gay person’s free speech.
Jesus. Tone it down a little. I can hear the shrillness from here. It’s rattling my teeth. You sure you don’t want to add a, “you just wait, you’ll see!” at the end there. I think it would be a pretty good capper.
I’m surprised he managed to type all that while furiously raeghumping a gently warmed cantaloupe with Milo’s face crudely drawn on it.
That’s nice. Have you watched the actual videos where Milo himself talks about how sex with 13 year olds is perfectly healthy and that he’s glad that he was molested by priest at 14 because that’s where he learned to give head? It’s not just that he’s telling himself that what happened to him was normal; he’s trying to insist that opposition to the sex abuse of minors is all a liberal feminist plot.
The Ghost of Simone de Beauvier is not standing behind him with a gun to his head forcing him to read a hostage statement. That’s Milo, with his own mouth, speaking his own words.
Here’s the link to the Joe Rogen - Milo Yiannopoulus interview I posted earlier. It’s not the only time Milo has talked about it. The links are just a short google away.
Glad you agree. So please stop saying, as you did in post #233,
If you don’t think it’s “arrogant” for conservatives to try to “dictate” to the ACU “whom they can invite”, then don’t try to argue that it’s “arrogant” for liberals to try to “dictate” to other organizations “whom they can invite”.
Serious question: I don’t think the average person even knows who the hell this guy is. I only started hearing about him towards the middle or end of last year, and that’s only through this message board. Where did he come from and why is he all of a sudden an important topic? Or have I just not been paying enough attention?
That’s nice. Have you watched the actual videos where Milo himself talks about how sex with 13 year olds is perfectly healthy and that he’s glad that he was molested by priest at 14 because that’s where he learned to give head? It’s not just that he’s telling himself that what happened to him was normal; he’s trying to insist that opposition to the sex abuse of minors is all a liberal feminist plot.
The Ghost of Simone de Beauvier is not standing behind him with a gun to his head forcing him to read a hostage statement. That’s Milo, with his own mouth, speaking his own words.
Here’s the link to the Joe Rogen - Milo Yiannopoulus interview I posted earlier. It’s not the only time Milo has talked about it. The links are just a short google away.
Milo was the victim of sexual abuse, not the other way around.
Had Milo been an actual pedophile and a rapist and if he had happened to be a leftist and also in Hollywood, then the liberals would be giving him a standing ovation and praising him.
That’s nice. Have you watched the actual videos where Milo himself talks about how sex with 13 year olds is perfectly healthy and that he’s glad that he was molested by priest at 14 because that’s where he learned to give head? It’s not just that he’s telling himself that what happened to him was normal; he’s trying to insist that opposition to the sex abuse of minors is all a liberal feminist plot.
The Ghost of Simone de Beauvier is not standing behind him with a gun to his head forcing him to read a hostage statement. That’s Milo, with his own mouth, speaking his own words.
Anyone interested can read those words right here:
The men in the joint video interview then discuss Milo’s experience at age 14.
Another man says: “The whole consent thing for me. It’s not this black and white thing that people try to paint it. Are there some 13-year-olds out there capable of giving informed consent to have sex with an adult, probably…”
The man says, “The reason these age of consent laws exist is because we have to set some kind of a barometer here, we’ve got to pick some kind of an age…”
Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age. I think it’s probably about okay, but there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age, I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who are sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world by the way. In many cases actually those relationships with older men…This is one reason I hate the left. This stupid one size fits all policing of culture. [People speak over each other.] This sort of arbitrary and oppressive idea of consent, which totally destroys you know understanding that many of us have. The complexities and subtleties and complicated nature of many relationships. You know, people are messy and complex. In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents. Some of those relationships are the most -”
“It sounds like Catholic priest molestation to me,” another man says, interrupting Milo.
Milo: “And you know what, I’m grateful for Father Michael. I wouldn’t give nearly such good head if it wasn’t for him.”
Other people talk. “Oh my God, I can’t handle it,” one man says. “The next thing in line is going to be pedophilia”…says another man.
Milo: “You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years-old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty. Who are too young to be able [unclear and cut off by others]…That’s not what we are talking about. You don’t understand what pedophilia is if you are saying I’m defending it because I’m certainly not.”
Another man said, “You are advocating for cross generational relationships here, can we be honest about that?”
Milo: “Yeah, I don’t mind admitting that. I think particularly in the gay world and outside the Catholic church, if that’s where some of you want to go with this, I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys. They can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide [people talk over each other]… providing they’re consensual.”
It’s not “politically motivated character assassination” to point out that Yiannopoulos said what he said.
Milo was the victim of sexual abuse, not the other way around.
Had Milo been an actual pedophile and a rapist and if he had happened to be a leftist and also in Hollywood, then the liberals would be giving him a standing ovation and praising him.
…because all the hatred for folks like Polanski is from conservative sources, right?
Milo was the victim of sexual abuse, not the other way around.
Had Milo been an actual pedophile and a rapist and if he had happened to be a leftist and also in Hollywood, then the liberals would be giving him a standing ovation and praising him.
Thank goodness the rightful right would never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever do anything like that.
But do keep supporting your babyfucker enabler, its quite revealing.
Milo was the victim of sexual abuse, not the other way around.
Had Milo been an actual pedophile and a rapist and if he had happened to be a leftist and also in Hollywood, then the liberals would be giving him a standing ovation and praising him.
You do realize that, no matter how much defending you do of him on this message board, Milo will just laugh at you when you beg him to let you suck him off.