I pit the goat felching douchenozzle(s) who blew up the Boston Marathon

[Debaser]

@ElvisL1ves

Then why bring it up?

It was an example. Nothing more. It could have been anyone who did this attack. My position on that has been consistent.

That’s a common, easy way to avoid trying to understand the thinking of someone who does something horrendous. It also does the opposite of fighting ignorance. This action was done by someone for some reasons that made sense to them, and it would help us all to try to understand what that might be.

Admitting you don’t know something isn’t the opposite of fighting ignorance. Making a guess based on your existing biases is the opposite of fighting ignorance though.

So do all manner of terrorist organizations around the world. Yet you’re singling out the most prominent one that has *denied *it. Why?

Why not? I’m simply pointing out that just like it could be a domestic right winger, it could also be an international terrorist group. It’s not that hard a concept to follow.

@ElvisL1ves

Quote or retract. Now. :dubious: Or run away like the cowardly, hate-filled little liar you are; your choice.

I already did once upthread, but here you go again:

@ElvisL1ves

I’d bet some teabagger(s) on Tax Day.

That this was Al Qaeda, and that it couldn’t have been one of your precious gunstroking teabaggers. Need cites, or do you know how to scroll up?

I have never said it couldn’t have been a domestic, Tea Party type who is responsible for this. So of course you have no cite for me saying that.

I also haven’t said it was Al Qaeda. I’ve said it could be them, but that’s it.

Reading for comprehension doesn’t seem to be your strong suit, does it?