(Side note: I found this because my Facebook friend was OUTRAGED the Onion made jokes about rape, even though they were kind of pointing out that rape is a big deal and not something the media should brush off because it was an athlete. Sigh Satire is lost on some)
You may as well ask if teachers sometimes rape their students. I think the answer is a pretty universal “yes” – people in authority over others sometimes abuse their power.
I think what sets this apart is not the rapists and victim, but the response and apparent involvement by so many in the community in a coverup. In some ways it is like a junior Penn State scandal, where the football team was considered so precious anyone who was a part of it seemed to be protected. But in the current scandal at least some of the protectors were not officials of the school or the team, but just fans, parents, or what have you.
There are plenty of paternalistic and openly misogynistic groups and countries where sufficiently popular, wealthy, or powerful men can often get away with a lot.
The friggin’ Catholic Church is Exhibit #1. Not always girls in those cases, but the same attitude of protecting their own is there.
Cases of US military sex assaults spiking with deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan and the often disappointing attempts to cover up or minimize the news are another example, as are often covered up or brushed over cases of assaults on local girls in foreign bases. And also at the service academies, for that matter.
And especially in those cases, there are cases of both implicit and explicit protection by the people and communities those people are supposed to serve.
. . . at least it’s getting national and Congressional attention from those lawmakers who are trying to get the DOD and the military to do more than provide lip service towards the idea of improving their record towards sexual assault.
There are places online where one can add their names to the list of people who do want to see this sort of situation improved. It’s not a huge contribution, but given how slowly progress has been being made, showing support for those Congresspersons pushing this issue, it’s worth taking a moment to do that much.
I don’t know much about Grand Juries. Do the 16 who refused to cooperate have to appear? If so, do they have to give testimony? Can they take the “5th?” What happens if they refuse to appear, or give testimony?
Not that they don’t deserve it but these boys lives may actually be fucked. I don’t see why it’s a such a shame to point that out. I would rather have that than what they did with Sandusky and label them as “monsters.” They are mere men who made terrible choices. The tone should have been more along the lines of “that’s what they get” instead of what they chose.
That seems like a pretty weak punishment–they can only be incarcerated for the term of the grand jury? Doesn’t seem like enough punishment to force someone to testify.
Federal grand juries sit for 18 to 24 months. According to this U-Dayton site, in Ohio the term is variable, but it suggests at least several months. So it’s not like a regular jury which may sit for just a few days. But you still might luck out if you get jailed as their term is nearing its end.
Read the non-bolded part. The idiot girls Equipoise asked about can be compelled to appear before the grand jury without benefit of council and can be jailed for refusing to do so. From the Wikipedia article:
These are the folks deciding if you can be charged, and you won’t have a lawyer while they are doing so. The old legal joke is that with a grand jury a prosecutor could “indite a ham sandwich”.
One other thing. It doesn’t say the situations in which any of these people withheld information. I’m not sure what option to punish them are available if they wouldn’t talk to cops on the street, for example. IANAL, but I think in most cases one has to be under some sort of court order to talk, and violate that, before they can be punished for it.
But maybe an actual lawyer can come along and clear this up for me.
The latest article by Ken at Popehat explains that the federal sentencing guidelines in this case give a recommendation of 0 to 6 months in jail, and that probation with no jail time is “extremely probable”.