IIRC, several years back some authorized Trek novel was written about the backstory romance between Will Riker and Deanna Troi. I guess I have no problem with this, because A) it’s authorized by the people who own the rights to these characters and created these characters and B) it’s within the scope of behaviours realistic to those characters and so the actors would have little reason to complain, as it’s merely an extension of the characters they’ve already agreed to play. I’d still prefer that the actors had some control or veto-power, but it’s just not feasible and I can live with that.
So when X-Files fans were writing and publishing on the net so-called “shipper” fan fic, romance stories between Mulder and Scully, I didn’t much approve of that because that was not authorized by Chris Carter, even if it was within the realistic scope of those characters behaviours. They’re his characters, not yours.
My only problem with the homosexual aspect is that, when applied to heterosexual characters, it makes for an extreme hijacking of characters, stolen from their creator and twisted to fit the slash author’s desires. If I wrote some screenplay about two gay men coming to terms with their sexuality and overcoming obstacles to gain the acceptance of their families and community, I surely wouldn’t appreciate someone on the internet writing a piece of “fan fiction” in which one of the characters decides homosexuality is immoral and that he really prefers having sex with women after all. You’d be twisting my characters, and I wouldn’t even want to call you a “fan” of mine.
But as I said, any unauthorized fiction co-opting characters from popular works is offensive to the hard work an original author put into creating those characters.
And we all have interests, but my problem with “fandom” is that people become fixated on one particular interest to levels that can only be described as “creepy”.
You may or may not be. If all you do is read a few stories on occasion, you probably aren’t. But all you need to do is see a few of the slash websites to know that there are many, many people who are totally obsessed with this in ways that look positively unhealthy, much like that Belvedere fan club’s unhealthy fixation on Mr. Belvedere.
Of course I don’t care what you think about. But would you go up to James Marsters and tell him that you fantasize about him in homoerotic situations? Probably not, because you know that might creep him out. But people are apparently willing to hide behind the pseudo-anonymity of the web and do essentially the same thing. What bothers me is that people publish this erotica on the net. Publishing it is what can harm the actors, and it’s what would tick off the creator of the characters.
If Josh Whedon, James Marsters and David Boreanaz all said explicitiy that they had no problem with fan fiction, including that of the erotic nature being written, then at that point I wouldn’t have a problem with someone writing Spike/Angel erotic fan fiction. I would consider that sufficient authorization.
How am I confused and ignorant? Aren’t I allowed to find it “weird and creepy” that people obsess over writing and reading erotic fiction about TV characters, to the point where they spend hours compiling and reading websites with literally hundreds of such stories? People in this thread may have tried to turn it into a slash fiction fan party, but this is the Pit, not CS, and the OP was not so limiting. Tolerance means you allow something to go on if it doesn’t hurt anybody, that you agree not to interfere with it, but it doesn’t require you to endorse everything or approve of anything, it doesn’t require anybody to like anything. As I’ve said, if it didn’t harm anybody, I’d just say “I find it weird and creepy, but you feel differently, so go right ahead.” My issue is that in addition to finding it weird and creepy, I also think it can be harmful to actors, and that it is unfair to the people who created these characters.