Yeah, but having that inscription burned on there was a bitch.
Yeah, and you can only see that sucker by tossing your penis into a fire.
Would it be woeth my time to put a [/hijack] here?
Ya know sarcastic responses work best when ya have an idea of the person’s normal stance. Look at Scyllas thread about his wife in the pit. Even he, who has a reputation and long posting history on this board, had some folks who weren’t certain how serious he was.
I read the original post and wasn’t certain if the person was joking or not. Looked at the other posts they’d made (all 15 or so of them at the time), all in the Pit, still wasn’t sure.
Now you’re saying you were joking. Fine. I’ll buy that. But, of course, since we didn’t know you in the first place, I dunno, some sort of clue might have been a nice gesture.
however, nicely done apology.
Skerri: Thanks for the tongue-in-cheek reply. However, it’s a little on the unoriginal side.
At the risk of offending others:*
If we are to take the bible’s account of the creation of humans literally, women are most certainly not the “expected outcome.” It says explicitly that MEN are made in GOD’s IMAGE and Eve was only created to be Adam’s “Helper” after he had found all the other animals to be unacceptable. 
(Obvioiusly, Adam had far more taste than your average farm hand. <Brent> “Sheep are beautiful creatures” </Brent>)
Which brings up another point… God originally thought a cow or a dog was an acceptable mate for man… what’s that say about God?
Munch: I’m glad that a long time member deems my apology to be the “Best. Apology. Ever.” 
That means a lot.
Someday, years from now when I have many posts to my name, I will dare to start a thread of my own. I hope it will evoke more positive emotions than this simple joke.
*I’m tired of apologizing for my twisted sense of humor. If you are insulted, bite me. 
Since when does anybody around here “take the bible’s account of the creation of humans literally?” I hate to say this, since I was prepared to believe Missy2U might not have been giving you a fair shake, and that it was all a joke and a misunderstanding, but your repeated anti-feminist (and possibly anti-women) posts suggest that you’re more serious than you let on.
For example, in this thread, you say,
Sounds like you have issues, buddy. Frankly, I don’t care if you’re tired of explaining your sense of humor. Sometimes, a twisted sense of humor makes you funny. Sometimes, however, it just makes you an asshole.
Sauron, Lord of Cock Rings. (nyuk, nyuk, nyuk) :rolleyes:
I’d bite you, but I’m all full up on empty calories and bullshit.
Humor, while in the eye of the beholder, does not give one carte blanche to be a misogynist schmuck.
Some of us are offended.
You want to post and be a slimebag? Fine.
We get to post that we think you are a slimebag.
This is a pattern for him? Well, that makes it rather less amusing…
Oh. Hmm…well, I still think Missy’s having a rough time, and that sucks. I guess it wasn’t so tongue-in-cheek after all.
Sam
Well this isn’t quite so witty and funny. If Missy knew of this post, I sure wish she had linked to it.
I still wish to know how my penis fits into her case, though.
The dude’s only got 18 posts, you can check his ENTIRE posting history if you want… I did, nothing unusual, really. All his posts are in the Pit, there is a somewhat anti-feminist bent to a few of them, mostly about being overly PC with pronoun genders.
After reading all of it, I figured it was a joke, certainly not serious, though he ain’t exactly a feminist.
snort
I hate having a grade-school sense of humor.
Yes, but my wang is, indeed, All That and a Bag of Christ Crunchies. Yea verily, My Wang Rocks Worlds.
Accept my wang as your Personal Savior (and personal pleasure unit) and you will be Saved!
My wang is love!
Oh, so now you have something against people named Brent? I know several people named Brent, and I very much doubt that any of them have ever participated in any sort of sexual act with any animal that is not a member of their species.
Yeah, the debug phase was a real bitch. God didn’t completely drop the ball, as he did with the hideously under-planned great reptile project, but his bobbles lead to the obviously broken Rosie O’Donnel.
As God is unwilling to accept his own errors (Anaximenes, you’re being too nice), he simply states lesbianism is an ‘undocumented feature’ and thus silently ignores all of those typos he made and gotchas he fell right into while hacking the Gender::Female package.
Ah yes, a classic example of God’s grasp being farther than his reach. He was trying to move the Female project away from the Holy Word core code and into a more expressive realm with the look-and-feel core. But he needed to make the Female project compatible with the Male project at a deep level, or the multiple inheritence the child processes require wouldn’t work correctly. Sadly, he realized this when he was nearly finished with the Female core, so he, facing a very angry Adam setting a harsh deadline, instituted Holy Word support as a crufty bag on the side of the actual core.
The debug phase of the Female project was almost nil, and this is what we get. Eve was an alpha release dressed-up as epsilon-level code. If Adam had gotten a chance to submit a bug report or two before the serpentine bug … well, let’s just say that after the Female project, God was in no mood to accept a bug report.
Don’t count on it. A bugfix of the Female project has been coming Real Soon Now since the Eden system crashed. I doubt God will ever do it. He’s gotten quite used to the ‘undocumented features’ in the code, and I don’t think the Lesbian Open House in the Vatican is going away anytime soon.
God has bumbled before, and he will again. Everyone remembers the collapse of the climatological subsystem and the Ice Age, but how about more recent screwups, like Jerry Falwell? God is loathe to clean up his code, preserve namespaces, or even properly comment it. He needs to take K&R to heart, but we all know the only book he values is the one he had ghostwritten.
(Missy: :D)
Uh, in that rant about proper use of English, when “god damn” is used as an adverb (“proper god damned English”), it should be hyphenated, like this; “PROPER GOD-DAMNED ENGLISH!” Capitalization is also optional, depending on which deity is doing the damning.
I was crying with laughter straight from the OP! Funny creation myth, and scorching flames! You guys…
This is part of the “Best.Apology.Ever.”? I don’t think Anaximenes was ever joking, and even if he was, it ain’t funny. Grow up, little man.
featherlou, while I’m not making apologies for Ana, you’re stretching it there. The “since this is the Pit, fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck” is incredibly common.
However, I do want to suspend any previous judgment until we get some more posting history on this kid.
I’m such a nerd. I came in here, thinking that Missy2U was about to rant about the Pre-Socratic philosopher.
Air is not the material principle, you fucking bitch!
Anaximenes, I laughed my freakin ass off at that whole paragraph you wrote. Funny. Extremely.
Missy2U on the other hand deliberately posted her measurements and then got pissed off at men in general when someone said something to her about it, even verbally flaying the person who responded solely because he has a penis.
Wow, and it’s not ok to crack jokes on the female sex? Get a life.
I never saw Waverly say that his penis was all that. I did see Missy post her measurements as if they are ‘all that’, and condemn Waverly for telling her that it looked like she was petting her own ego?
For crying out motherfucking loud. I don’t like most of the self-titled feminists I’ve met because: in there eyes, everything wrong with this world is wrong because there are men. I’m really tired of hearing ‘feminists’ like the one I conversed with on the CNN message board whose position on domestic violence was that it’s only a problem if a woman is being beaten by a man. In her opinion, lesbians, gay men, and men who were abused in any way by women can fucking rot in hell.
Met a few members of the CWO (Campus Women’s Organization) back in college who firmly believed that all men are potential rapists and should be treated as if they are rapists because you can 'never be too careful.
And then there’s the main reason I can’t stand feminist-apologist types: any disagreement with them or what they said meets the ‘you just hate women’ retort. They refuse to handle a difference of opinion, or even a joke, without calling someone a misogynist and insisting that it’s ‘testosterone poisoning’ that caused the offending attitude. Any disagreement at all, with anything they say, is due to someone thinking his ‘penis is all that’ or being a ‘traitor to the patriarchy’.
I would like to know when disagreeing with a feminist became automatic misogyny, and when it became the case that someone couldn’t dislike the radical feminist apologist movement of hatred towards men without being labeled a woman-hater because SOMEONE invariably points out ‘but not all feminists are the same.’
Cause frankly, I both disagree with and severely disklike Andrea Dworkin, Catherine MacKinnon and all of their clones… and I’m definitely no misogynist.