This is a weird subject - it touches not only on highly controversial methods of judicial punishment, but also aspects of suicide and euthanasia.
Imagine you’re on death row. All appeals have been turned down, there’s no chance of a last-minute pardon. It doesn’t matter whether you’re actually guilty, or what your stance on capital punishment is. The state will shuffle off your mortal coil whether you like it or not. Nothing short of a dramatic jail break will delay the proceedings.
Do you care how it’s done? What considerations go into your decision: level of pain, duration of the procedure, respect for your personal dignity, respect for your family, etc.?
(I want to live. Even though I deeply believe in an afterlife that is far more rewarding that anything we can imagine here, I don’t want to go there just yet. No, I’m not depressed. That said…) I think that, if I were at this point in the system, I’d be inclined to take whatever they give me as long as (a) it doesn’t last much more than 10-15 minutes and (b) my family gets some kind of closure - a body to bury, whatever. I hesitate to engage in macho swaggering here, but I’m not sure fear of pain would put me off of the procedure, if I’m going to die anyway.
Not to say that I wouldn’t hold out for a dramatic escape, though.
I’ve been thinking on this after the stories this past summer about lethal injection, and how through the phenomenon of anasthesia awareness, the recipient may feel all the pain as the KCl cocktail stops the heart. Horrifying, yes, but the condemned is about to die, and in fact will die relatively quickly.
(Mods, if this is more appropriate for IMHO, please accept my apologies and my thanks!)