I really don’t get the concept that there’s deception involved in modifying one’s body and then showing off the modification. Especially when, according to the person claiming ‘deception’, it’s obvious that the modification has happened. Isn’t that the direct opposite of deception? I see nothing to support the idea that there is any deception. And a significant portion of most people’s looks are bought and paid for - clothes, makeup, jewelry, hairstyles, gym/trainer fees and time, etc. all cost money and/or require a significant chunk of time. If that is a problem, then you need to be upset at just about anyone who’s going out in public or making a youtube video focusing on their looks.
Also the closing statement where the OP feels that women’s choices about how to manage their own bodily structure should be based on what’s attractive to him is… interesting.
Done right they are appealing. However, I’m a bit worried about the dangerous and exaggerated lengths people will go to in order to please some perceived societal aesthetic.
Actually, no; while I know very few women who’ll put on makeup first thing in the morning, most of the makeup-wearers I do know won’t take it off until they’re getting ready to bed, if then. This is one of the reasons why “makeup you don’t need to take off” is so popular.
As for cosmetic surgery in general, most of the people who claim not to like it are actually only talking about either bad jobs or the post-op stages when things haven’t quite reached the desired appearance. And then there’s the issue of corrective cosmetic surgery: again, most of the people who claim to dislike cosmetic surgery claim to have “no trouble” with implants after a mastectomy, and I’ve still to see someone who was against correcting harelip or a deviated septum. But alas, if the person who just got surgery to correct a deviated septum happens to be an actress, model or TV presenter, here come the criticising hordes*!
Only if female, mind you. Apparently nobody looks at male noses.
Rarer but they do exist. I’ve developed a taste for Japanese porn because big or small – unlike American porn – they are almost never “enhanced.”
I’ve preferred smaller all my life. All I asked of a pair I get to play with is that they’re bigger than mine. As I’ve gotten older, this is harder to accomplish.
From the name, I would expect it to be a line drawn along the region where the flum has a constant value.
You could then have a series of isoflum lines, giving you a contour map of the flum values. You could even tell the direction of the maximum flum gradient, which ought to be perpendicular to the isoflums.
The machine translation can’t handle it. You saw the results, as follows:
The bust part that can not be seen on the surface, called this is called the skim milk, the size of the visible bust part which is said to be flat milk = it is a decoration, and for a great person it is not understood. The part which does not appear on the surface = the whole body including the isoflum is bust . In addition, by multiplying ischemia with skim milk , part hidden is visualized as actual milk .
I don’t know if you can see the Japanese, but there are some vocabulary which are relevant.
虚乳 = kyonyuu. This was translated as “isoflum” and also as “skim milk” and “ischemia.” The real meaning is “fake tits” including the results of pushup bras. Here is a manga showing it. Not NSFW unless having an illustration of a girl holding her breasts together to create cleavage isn’t cool at your work place. The pronunciation is the same as “巨乳” “giant tits” or big tits. The second character is the character for “milk” which is why the various words include milk as the translation.
Slightly off topic. I remember talking to my (platonic) friend on the phone:
Me: “Hey, I was thinking about stopping by your place for a while. Figured we can order a pizza and watch a movie or something.”
Her: “Okay, but I’m not wearing any make up and I’m in my sweatpants”
Lol. How am I supposed to respond to a statement like that?: “Oh, not wearing any make up? Yikes! I’ll take a rain check on that Nicole”
(That wasn’t my actual response. I just thought it was weird she felt the need to “warn” me.)
I AM upset by those people! This thread was about vanity, not “self esteem” or breast cancer, whatever irrelevant crap others wanted to drag into it. Vanity used to be a bad thing, and now it feels like no big deal. Breast implants serve no purpose other than to augment one’s appearance. Whether that is to satisfy others or oneself, it’s STILL vanity. They are not the only example, they are just one of many.
So you agree with me that it’s about how they look. Which means you agree with me that people who say “how I look is irrelevant to my wearing of makeup, heels etc” are lying. Which is the source of my scepticism about those who have breast enhancement. So we are in agreement, right?
Most of your post is purest waffle and/or accidental or deliberate misunderstanding of what I’m saying and I don’t intend to dignify it with a reply. The above is the crux of the matter.
You ain’t gettin’ it. Why does getting breast enhancement cure depression, make one confident, give a positive experience etc? Think a bit beyond the surface.
Imagine someone said to you “I want more money because then I’ll be happy”. If you were thinking deeply about why money would make them happy, would you stop at "because it will make them happy’? Is that it? Is that as far as your thinking extends? Of course not. You would surmise (correctly I suppose) that they think money will make them happy because it will give them greater security in relation to the necessaries of life, and of status and comfort and so on. Right?
But in relation to breast enhancement, you are stopping (figuratively speaking) at “because it will make them happy” without going any further and thinking why it will make them happy.
Here’s a clue; imagine we were cave creatures who lived in total darkness and interacted by sense of smell. Do you seriously imagine that in such a world we would worry if one breast was larger than another? Or feel more confident because our breasts looked normal? Or stopped being depressed because we had young looking breasts?
Saying “makeup is about how the wearer looks” is like “paint is about how the wall looks”. Do you believe that people whose houses never get visited do not paint the inside?
