Hmm… Most of this actually checks out. I think the flaw is that you’re implicitly dividing your infinite number by itself to get ‘number of eyes per angel.’ Unfortunately, the mathematical rule ‘any number divided by itself equals 1’ breaks down for infinite numbers.
Who put the bomp in the bomp-bomp-bomp-bomp-bomb?
Who put the ram in the rama-lama-ding-dong?
Do you walk to work, or bring a lunch?
Actually, according to Cantor’s theory of transfinite cardinals, not only are quantities equal to themselves, but infinite quantities are equal to subsets of themselves. Imagine a hotel with an infinite number of floors, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4… ∞. Now, remove all the even-numbered floors, so that the only floors remaining are numbered 1, 3, 5, 7… ∞. Half as many floors remain, right? But there are still an infinite number of floors! Therefore ∞ = ∞/2. Which means that 2∞ = ∞. And, for that matter, 20∞ = ∞.
So the angels could have any number of eyes each, and there would still be the same number of eyes in total.
How much wind could a windbreaker break if a windbreaker could break wind?