Barron Trump is just a child. He has no control over his circumstances and doesn’t deserve to be in the public eye. At the same time his father is doubling on an extremely reckless and controversial non-plan to reopen schools, without enough guidance or support to keep. This could endanger the lives of schoolchildren and their teachers. Donald Trump wants to decide what’s best for everyone else’s child. Has it become a matter of public interest what the Trumps’ plan are for their child? Is Barron going to go back to school? Private tutors and live-in governesses aren’t an option for the other 99%. And even if they do send him back to school it’ll would be to a school with better resources to deal with COVID19 than any public or most private schools. Any thoughts?
I could live with that sort of questioning: Mr Trump, where is your kid going to school, and what precautions are they taking? Going after the kid is not okay.
I’d say no. The only way it would be a legitimate issue is if the Trumps had been sending Barron to a public school before this year and were now choosing to keep him home.
Minor children of any President are off limits. While the answer would be interesting, it is inevitably political and should never be asked. There are plenty of ways to know Trump’s feelings about the safety of children without bringing this up. Off limits.
I, too, am leery of any press discussion of a President’s minor child(ren), but I would be OK with this. It doesn’t name Barron, touches on an important public-health issue, and (I suspect) would show just how ill-informed, if not ignorant, Trump is about his own son’s education.
It’s not off limits because it’s not actually about his son. Nothing his son does is relevant to the question–what is being asked is what the Trumps will do for their son.
I would extend it to any COVID-denier type. If they claim the threat isn’t actually what it is, but they protect their own kid, you know they’re bullshitting you. It does not at all reflect on the kid–you don’t even need to know their names or what they look like for it to be relevant.
That’s the criteria for me. If all we knew was that Trump had a school-aged son, and knew nothing else about him, the question would still be relevant, and would in no way identify him.
I agree with the policies that protect minor children from public scrutiny. Of course, Fox News and the right wing media never respected that line when it was Barack and Michelle Obama’s minor children and their hypocrisy should be called out.
It’s no secret that Trump HAS a minor child and I think it’s acceptable to refer to that fact while framing a question about policy. It’s kind of like how attorney/client privilege does not protect the fact of the existence of an attorney/client relationship.
I think that asking Trump if he would be concerned about the health of his son if his school reopened would be a fair question. That is a question about Trump and Trump’s attitudes and it’s not a personal question at all. Of course, the right wing press would be all “ the health of Trump’s son is a private matter, how dare the liberal media try to compromise this very personal violation, Bill Barr should investigate them for a HIIPA violation. But that would be bullshit.