In which I ruminate on the endemic nature of racism, and ponder why some can't see it

We’ve had our skirmishes on these Boards, but I just wanted to pop back in and tell you that you don’t sound like a racist to me–there’s no reason you need to have some special interest in another person’s culture. If you do, great, maybe you’ll learn something and have some fun while you’re at it, but if it’s not your thing, it’s not your thing. Nobody would tell a black person who confesses a deep loathing of the country/western culture and music that he’s a racist.

I was often assumed racist at my elementary school, where I was one of five or six “white” kids in a really, really large class. Nevermind that I’m Jewish and that my family’s first American generation didn’t get here until the 20th century–I was seriously held personally responsible for slavery, lynchings and every Confederate victory by a lot of my fellow students. Their parents were all highly educated doctors, lawyers, etc. who you would think would be teaching their kids historical perspective. BTW, my parents didn’t educate me on race relations adequately either, IMO.

Sounds like a classic straw man to me. I’m behind you on the other two points, though.

After all, Everyone is a Little Bit Racist. Seriously, though, you’re absolutely right and we need to acknowledge our inner racist instead of denying its existence.

An interesting thing happened in my high school. My freshman year was the year it was actually opened up for the first time, and 100 freshman and 50 sophomores were admitted. We all took the same classes and everyone knew everyone else, and lunch table configurations etc. pretty much ignored race, religion, etc. But two or three years in, new freshman classes started coming in and as the school’s student body inched towards 400 (at which it now stays constant) it got more and more self-segregated by race. By my junior year white kids hung out with whites, blacks with black, Asians with Asian, Hispanic with Hispanic etc. I was on the basketball team and the change was pretty obvious there too; we always had a pretty constant balance of whites, blacks and Latinos with one or two Asians or Pacific Islanders and again by my junior year the players on the team only hung out with teammates of the same race on their free time. It was really odd; I was kind of the odd man out because the other white kids on the team happened to be total jerks, so after a couple of years I couldn’t really hang out with any of my teammates. I quit the team in my senior year because it just wasn’t as fun as it was my first year.

But it does. (Great combination of username/thread, BTW. :wink: ) Or at least, it’s often used that way.

Have you considered that this really does apply in the general and not the specific? I think jsgoddess is well aware that you’re not involved in any of those three areas.

Presumably this would be followed by an admission of racism from same black folks - I don’t see it either.

I think the best we all can do is teach our children as best we can. I would say I was raised without racism. However, I’ll also say my parents are more prejudiced than I am. And I in turn know people who are less prejudiced than I am. I do my best, but sometimes my instincts tell me something else. I’d like my child to not have those instincts. What more can I really do?

Good stuff, for the most part, going on here. To be even willing to engage in a conversation about racism, and coming to terms with how it hurts us all, is a big step. I know for some folks it sounds hollow, but my experience has been that very smart, generally well-meaning liberally minded people like to act as if racism is the sole domain of knuckle-dragging troglodytes with white hoods. By picking the most extreme example, any less serious behavior can be glossed over. Note that I didn’t specify race of these said very smart, generally well-meaning liberally minded people. That’s because I know people of all races - and I would include myself in that number - who occasionally engage in prejudical, even racist behavior.

This is fantastic, and I think exactly what I was trying to get at, thanks jsgoddess! The second example is particularly good to use. I see people denigrate rap, or hip hop in ways I don’t see death metal, hard rock, boy bands, and country, for example, reviled. The connection between violence and the music is tenuous - rap artists didn’t invent the idea of having posses, getting into fights, sexual misconduct, or objectifying women. I can easily think of examples of all these behaviors from many different musical genres. I also know that even though the media loves to report stories of rappers involved in these behaviors, they exist among all socioeconomic and racial groups - Duke lacrosse players, anyone? Furthermore, there are sizable numbers of rappers - and lacrosse players - who do not expressly engage in these negative behaviors.

The most worrisome aspect of this is that it affects the life chances and opportunities for different people in disproportionate ways. I attend an Ivy League institution and I can point out examples of theft, assault, drug use and distribution, etc. among White students* on a daily basis. Most of these situations never get to a criminal level - the behaviors are ignored or mildly rebuked. On the occasion that some of these actions rise to arrest or conviction, an often-heard rationalization is that the accused is a hard-working college student Meanwhile, a minority kid in the inner-city is much less likely to get the benefit of his or her theft, assault, drug use and distribution, etc. ignored or mildly rebuked.

If one looks at all of the indicators we associate with better life opportunities - from infant mortality, to percentages of the population receiving prenatal care and health insurance, to college attendance and graduation rates, to income, to life expectancy - White Americans consistently come out on top while people of color tend to come out on the bottom. Either White Americans are superior and people of color are inferior in many ways, or there are factors that shuffle the deck in favor of Whites and against people of color. The latter makes a ton of sense to me, as I’ve encountered enough people from across racial groups to notice that good and bad behavior/intelligence/effort seems to be fairly equally distributed. That’s how I see it.

While I am not White, I am male, and I see it exactly the same way for women. Men tend to surpass women in all of the economic indicators - the only way to explain that would be to state that men are superior to women, or that there are factors that make it simultaneously easier for men and more difficult for women to succeed. Having meet significant numbers of men and women varied in skill, intelligence, and drive to the point I can’t make meaningful associations of traits with either gender, it seems glaringly obvious to me that men are privileged in this society, and women are discriminated against. This doesn’t explain every negative outcome for a woman on the individual level, but at least in the professional world, I’d argue that it is a conflating factor. (I put this here only to make a point that I get what it is like to be privileged in some contexts and deconstruct and understand how privilege puts another group at a disadvantage - I really don’t want to jump tracks to a gender debate!)

  • Purely to help demonstrate my point. Black, Latino, Asian, South Asian, and Native American students get up to these behaviors as well.

Racism is a people problem. It just so happens that it affects different people in different ways. It all depends on who is on top and who is on bottom.

Racial bias is a spectrum of beliefs and behaviors. Racism is near the extreme end of it; xenophobia and ethnic cleansing are worse; I will also put forth the somewhat controversial opinion not all racial bias is necessarily bad nor are certain opinions formed from interracial experiences always inaccurate, especially if you’re reacting/anticipating behaviors from peoples you are regularly interacting with. Most people can’t SEE racism because most people have a skewed understanding of racial bias and tend to overcompensate by treating ALL racial bias as if it were the same as racism. As healthy and reasonable reactions go, this is untenable.

We’d be a lot better off if we quit lumping all racial bias into the behavioral extreme/ideology of racism, and learn to recognize simple racial prejudice, racial discrimination, racial bigotry and racial xenophobia for the often faulty beliefs that they are.

:: Riffing ::

Ghanima. Oh, I’m definitely bigoted. Sometimes racist, too.

levdrakon. I admit I get extremely annoyed with white Americans who won’t admit they and their families have (and in many cases still continue to) directly benefitted from racial privileges and racial discrimination that have mariginalized – not just blacks – but Latinos, Asians, Indians, Jews, etc. By extension, I and my family have been hurt at times by this same racial bias. This is changing, but this is still the reality in America.

jsgoddess. It bears repeating: not all racial bias is racism.

elanorigby. If a cultural indifference and disdain of a certain group’s traditions is reliable proof racism, then most probably everyone reading this is a racist. Obviously that’s not true.

fetus. It’s closer to the truth that Everybody Is A Little Bit Racially Biased. That racial bias is benign or extreme, varying from person to person.

silenus. Using racism, or indeed, any powerful, provokative word describing human behavior inappropriately tends to continue to empower the word and distract from the effect and underlying causes why that behavior exists. As to your noting the fluidity of your feelings regarding race, attractiveness and women, this a reason why racial/ethnic bias is a more accurate term.

you with the face. I have said this before, and I’ll say it again: I disagree with most dictionaries because the second defintion of racism in the link you provided is typically incomplete: discrimination and prejudice based on race is NOT synonymous with actual racism. It reflects bigotry. Any definition of racism that does not include the use or threat of physical violence is as a means to enforce a belief in a mythical racial heirarchial superiority is not a good definition of racism.

Hippy Hollow. Most of your OP described racial prejudice, discrimination, racial bias and ethnocentrism, rather than racism. This is not always A Bad Thing.

The definition you with the face provides for racism is certainly valid. I’d suggest, though, that if any change in behaviour/interactions based on race is going to be defined as racist, then at some mild level it’s perfectly acceptable to be racist, because having some response to difference and/or cultural messages is absolutely unavoidable.

What’s the difference?

If someone says something is racist, that declaration is not enough to convince me that my heart should palpitate and that my eyes should bulge with outrage. In order to get me fired up, it has to be obvious why something that is supposedly racist could lead to harm. Which means the conversation should include more than just name-calling.

I’ve said it plenty of times on this board: just because something is racist doesn’t mean it is offensive. People all too often want to use the terms interchangably, so that the simple act of labeling something racist means they don’t have to explain why its such a big deal. Because, you know, that actually takes work. It’s far easier to just stick a label on something and hope that is enough, but for me, it rarely is enough. When folks tried to convince why Nagin should be hated because his “chocolate city” remarks, I was left unpersuaded when all they could say was “But he’s being racist!” or “Had he been white, he’da been slaughtered!” My response was and still is, yes and so what? Give me more of a reason to hate the guy than that, please.

This type of thing strikes me as intellectually laziness. Not something that should be promoted. I don’t believe “racism” should be used as weapon, ever. Most people here probably would say they agree with me. But when attempts to diffuse the word of all its “impact and power” are met with dogged resistance, it makes me wonder why. You can’t decry the weaponization of the term while clinging, at the same time, to the notion that only Really Really Bad People can be racist. That’s like handing your opponent ammo and not expecting them to use it against you in the heat of battle.

Conversations are for fun, debates are for points.

Hippy I think I understand the point you are trying to make and I think I agree with it. While there is a racism part to Bonds being disliked, the other threads Op blew it out of proportion. I am not colorblind, I don’t know how to be, but I like to think I don’t let it affect my judgment {much}. I was in a thread arguing almost by myself with posters I normally agree with defending Al Sharpton at one point. You should have joined in that one last year.
There is a lot of racism still left in this country and in the world. We have made a lot of progress. Irrational claims that the white man is keeping Bonds down, does more to hurt the way people view racism than the idiots who do not want to see Bonds get past Ruth. At least that is my opinion.

Someone up thread asked if the Bonds was surly to the press first or the press was on Bonds first. Bonds was surly first. When he broke in the press wanted to cover him. Son of an All Star, they loved the story and wanted to love the kid. It was Bonds have acted like a jerk all along.

Jim

This seems quite reasonable. Thank you.

As for rap getting a bad er, rap: I don’t like the rhythms of rap or the lyrics. I don’t like much hiphop–I’m middle aged. I also don’t like “rock” like Marilyn Manson or that ilk. Stating a dislike of rap music doesn’t mean that any or all other music is in comparison good–it’s a matter of taste. If there is legislation strictly aimed at rap vs rock or country or classical for that matter–that’s a different kettle of fish.

fetus -you’re right, and I said as much in my previous post. This can be a touchy subject. It needs to be talked about more often and more publicly. There is an ongoing project in my community called “Healing Racism” which has done much good, IMO in qwelling white flight here and in helping everyone become better neighbors.

Nevertheless, given the topic and most of the responses so far…

Moved from IMHO to GD.

I think you’d really enjoy this book

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316090301/102-7187375-0907321?v=glance&n=283155

I found it to be very interesting and the author goes in depth with things like group mentality, how we break ourselves into groups along lines of race, class, ethnicity, religion, appearance, nationality, etc. The tools we use to distinguish ourselves are far more diverse than just skin color.

I personally find modern american racism to be a mild nuisance at best. Compared to the genocides that have occured due to nationality or ethnicity being more likely to be pulled over by the police a few times is a mild problem.

Other ‘us vs them’ traits are far more damaging to us as a nation. It is redundant coming from me as I have posted on the issue before but our cultural love of thinness and disgust/fear of bodyfat is far more damaging to the individuals living here than our cultural love of light skin and disgust/fear of dark skin. It affects and harms far more people than racism.

Sounds like a Seinfeld episode.

Personally I’d like to see racism defined strictly as a feeling that a particular race is superior or inferior, evidenced by clearly intentioned words and actions. It’s an overall repugnant worldview and should not be casually invoked to describe someone who may just be inexperienced in a multicultural world. When you do that, you basically eliminate any possibility of opening a dialogue and having an exchange of understanding.

Something else I don’t like about the charge of racism is that it is invariably a one-way affair. Racial oppression is essentially one-sided but racist attitudes are definitely not.

Over recent years, I’ve started to come to the conclusion that racial bigotry is still extremely prevalent, and I’m not convinced that it’s less so than it was 40-50 years ago. We’ve just changed what forms of it we’re willing to tolerate as a society, and it’s therefore been interwoven with other issues. That’s not to say that everyone who supports those issues is prejudiced, but the prejudiced have found a new home, and it’s a bit prettier, at least on the outside. I’m actually torn whether this is worse or better than it was before. At least it was possible to be outraged by the maltreatment of minorities when they were openly treated as second-class citizens, but how does one today decide if that “State’s rights” advocate is truly against an overpowered federal government or simply a bigot hiding behind an issue? Yes, many of them eventually trip up and get “outed”, but that’s not common enough for the problem to be as visible as it once was, and it therefore doesn’t get the level of debate and attention that is needed to help reduce it. We used to know immediately where someone stood. Now it takes a pattern of behavior (or a screwup) to even warrant suspicion of bias.

Aside from the fact that lynchings seem to have disappeared, is this hidden bigotry better or worse than the open bigotry of yore?

DMC, its a bit of both.

Overt instances of both racism and bigotry are fewer and far less widespread than 40-50 years ago. I’d say this was the case in most industrialized countries in the world, not just the United States.

But in those havens where these attitudes are thriving, where racists and bigots of all races can chat amongst themselves and be plain spoken in their prejudice, hatred and receive a warm audience that doesn’t challenge their thinking, they are both virulent and intractable.

Hidden bigotry is better because it makes those attitudes seem even more sad, outdated and distasteful whenever they do come to light ion the mainstream and diverse audiences. It’s worse because it’s more difficult to guage, oppose and counter.

This is why I advocate going to places like Stormfront message boards and keeping a watchful eye on them fools.

I really do think things have gotten better. It is far from perfect, but things are improving. Just observing many more mixed couples seems like a good indicator things have been improving or am I sheltered living in the “Liberal North East”?

Jim

First, I would like to say that this is an excellent thread so far. I have rarely participated in discussions of race relations that have been this productive.

One advantage to having been raised in the “Liberal North East” is that the likelihood of me encountering blatant violent racism is very low. Instead I am subject to a more subtle form of bigotry. I liken this behavior to trying to run on a course littered with cinder blocks. As well as I may maneuver through it most of the time I will eventually fall on my face. The people, who handle these biases in the best fashion, are those who are capable of educating the offender while maintaining their own values and self-esteem. This is a lovely thought but it is not as practical as it may sound.

In ninth grade, I was one of the kids who sat at the “black” table during lunch. My grade had a black population of 14/680. Six of us happened to share a lunch period and we all sat together mainly due to comfort. It is easy to sit with people who share your interests and background because then you do not have to worry about saying anything that might set you too far apart from the group. The thing is, we had similar conversations to everyone else in that room. Complaining about schoolwork, talking about crazy parents, discussing the cute girl/boy in whatever class; none of this is that different from any other ninth grade. Still, no one really felt comfortable sitting with us.

We had an entire table to ourselves and our lunch tables sat 20 comfortably. Imagine how ridiculous it must look for people to walk in and see a packed lunchroom (our school was overcrowded) and this one table with excess space. It took me a long time to realize that the main reason people were hesitant to come over and make themselves at home was because of their preconceptions. One white girl from my Biology class told me about it when I offered to help her with a lab during lunch. She told me that she was hesitant to sit there because she did not want to upset anyone and she did not want to invite herself into our group. I laughed but it gave me a lot to think about.

Some people just have not had the benefit of interacting with other races. They get most of their information from television and stories that they have heard. It sounds ridiculous to many, but in numerous cases it is the truth. No matter how mature a person is people still want to feel comfortable with their surroundings. No one wants to worry about offending people by saying the wrong thing or by saying nothing at all. Unfortunately developing a high level of comfort in foreign situations is based on trial and error. I learned pretty early on that no one in the football locker room gave a damn about the crazy chemical equation that I balanced in class earlier. Sometimes people do not realize that telling their favorite black joke might be a bad way to break the ice at a table of blacks telling jokes. How people deal with their failed attempts will ultimately govern what they try in the future, if at all.

My wife and I were talking about Barry Bonds and sports last night a little because of the threads here. She feels there is very little racism in baseball, the people with bigotry have probably tuned-out, as so many players are Caribbean at this point. The sportswriters and announcer all seem to embrace the Multiculturalism of modern sports.
It made me wonder, did the increase popularity of NASCAR, a very white and very southern sport coincide with the heavy influx of foreign-born players? Is this some of the latent racism manifesting itself that was discussed in this thread? I apologize for how ignorant this question might sound, but I live, eat and breathe baseball in one of the few regions of the country where baseball is still the #1 sport. I know almost nothing about NASCAR or why it has grown so popular. NASCAR is still a minor sport in my area.

Jim {BTW: great post Frosted Glass}