I dunno. I liked that Borg vs McEnroe movie from a few years ago and he gave a nice normal acting performance in it.
I don’t think he was that bad in Indy 4; in fact he did a great job with a role that we didn’t really need all that much.
At least when the hat blew towards him at the end of the movie, they were smart enough to have Indy grab it, put it on, and kind of laugh at Shia with that “No way, kiddo” look.
I get current with interspersed flashbacks, the dial looked like the Antikythera mechanism in that flash we got. Not sure what else it is actually about, maybe Greek mythos coming alive? Underwater makes me think if the Antikythera shipwreck perhaps having more than just the funky astrolabe thingy.
Will I see it? Yes, but once it hits home streaming media - I am long past enjoying going to a theater for a film. I don’t like the seating [maybe if we could go to one that has the neat beds, or really good recliners] I don’t like interfacing with other humans [eew, peopleing. ] I dislike craptastic theater junk food [you should try my husbands ‘Irish Nachos’ with hand cut waffle fries, proper bacon, homemade cheddar cheese sauce which is actually welsh rarebit thinned out a smidge] and I don’t have to worry about why my feet are sticking to the floor.
I swear, I should get that video projector, we could hang a huge white surface to project upon, kill the lights, relax in bed and enjoy a big screen experience [my faceblort has been advertising some sort of hook to the computer projector, and a different ad for a home theater sound system with a big subwoofer to make the room shake …]
I liked it except for some scenes that ran overlong. I actually liked Indy and Marion arguing in the truck, the son was OK in concept, not sure Beefy dude was the best option for playing the kid. I liked the library motorcycle scene where he paused to tell the students the best references to use.
Some people here might remember that Raiders of the Lost Ark was inspired as an homage to Saturday matinee serials (how many here actually ever saw any of those in a theater? I did), with action sequences, and cliffhangers, and not a big regard for logic in the plot. Those serials were also noted for cheesy production values, uninspired dialog, and a lot of repetitiveness. So it looks like this new installment just carries all of that to its logical extreme. Pardon me while I go yawn about something else.
I’m just stunned that the new Indiana Jones movie that feels like it’ll just be a cash-in on a property that should have been put to bed (it belongs in a museum!!) so I’m not going to bother see it is 14 years old.
I haven’t personally watched it all the way through, but I was working at Blockbuster when it came out, and my manager chose Kingdom of the Crystal Skull to show off the greater clarity of Blu-ray as opposed to DVD, to great effect.
For some reason, though, he chose, during his sales pitch, to push the fact that Blu-ray has loading screens (and DVDs don’t) as a feature, not a bug.
After watching Everything Everywhere All At Once I can say that the return of Ke Huy Quan would elevate an IJ film far more than the return of Shia LeBoeuf.
It really is a terrible title. And I agree that the fact that they’ve gone with such a terrible title does not bode well for the film itself.
I still miss The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles - still the same OTT action interspersed with world events and famous people (like Forrest Gump with more punching) but with better writing and fewer ludicrous Macguffins. I’d rather see a more measured Netflix series starring Ford (maybe six episodes’ worth) than yet another “Indie goes in search of another magic item while fighting off villains too silly for Bond films, whose heads melt at the end” film.
If anyone’s interested, the Critical Drinker has posted his reaction to this trailer, including a mention of the dismaying rumors that have been going around since word of a disastrous test screening have gotten out.
The rumors, if true, would constitute a huge spoiler, so be advised.
Over the years, I’ve gone from thinking “The Indy franchise is a good series marred by a bad film” to “the Indy franchise is a BAD series that got incredibly lucky in the first film so much they’re still fooling people that they are good films.” Not unlike Star Wars.
I’ve even come to think of Last Crusade as more like Return of the Jedi. It’s got some good parts, but it really isn’t a good film.
I mean, 14 years since the last film, plenty of time to come up with a great story, and the words “disastrous test screening” are being used? How can that happen?