Difficult for heterosexual men, but not impossible.
Even if the gender ratio is 1:1, men still tend to make the first contact. That means women are flooded in responses – at least those with average or better profiles – and they can pick and choose from the responses coming in. Women often respond to the flood of responses in one of three ways:
-
Respond to those from only the most desirable men, which means there’s going to be a small minority of men getting the vast majority of dating “action”. (See my earlier post about the sustainability of the model of online dating.)
-
Tweak their profiles to make them more selective, in an attempt to throttle the flood of responses. The result: women often demanding qualities in their prospective dates that end up narrowing down the range of men to those that IRL would be out of their league. Example: a 5’ 2" woman with an average build, a high school education, employment as a secretary and no stated income seeking men who are at least 6’ tall, a full college education, an athletic (not average) build, and a 75K+ income.
-
Overwhelmed, they ignore everything that comes in, without even reading the responses, and step away from the computer. They’ll delete all their messages, and wait until things simmer down. I have the best response rate from profiles where the woman still has an active profile, still checks in daily (which you can see with match.com), but she’s been on the service for at least four to six months. Not great; maybe one in three or four will respond instead of one in 15, but still a lot better.
I do get women who write to me unsolicited, but I’d say most are either Russian romance scammers (“I look ,your structure the online very nicely and I seekingly , nice manly to date and ,marriage. I with shall impatience shall .wait your answer.”) or women that are far below my league (Jean Teasdale-types, 30-something grandmothers, and obese women. Pit me.) Occasionally I’ll get a legitimate response from a “peer,” but more often than not it’s someone who lives a little bit further away than I would normally consider. I can’t get a Jewish girl in Cleveland to give me the time of day, but I get a lot of email from Jewish girls (and those of other faiths) in Akron.
Checklist dating is rampant; “You MUST be (list of 20 qualities).”
Three more things men have to deal with:
**Generic profiles. ** I think that because women will generally get lots of email if they just make their presence known, they don’t have to put a lot of effort into their profiles. You see a lot of this:
Can you keep up? I’m a kind, caring woman who works hard and plays hard. I love walks in the park, strolls along a moonlit beach, candlelit dinners, and lying by the fireplace with that special someone while sippng wine. I like going out and staying at home, and being active or just sitting on the couch. I love to laugh, and I love life. I want a man who love to laugh, love life, know what he wants, works hard and play hard, doesn’t play games, enjoy going out for a night on the town as well as staying home and watching a DVD, and who is just as comfortable in jeans and a t-shirt as in a tuxedo. Must be at 6’ tall, very athletic, square-jawed, accomplished in his career, (and about 10 other qualities)
I hate generic profiles because it gives me nothing to start with in crafting a response. What am I going to say; “I love to laugh too!”?
**Internet disease. ** Call me superficial, but when every photo of a women is only from the neck up, shows her hiding behind objects so you can’t see below her shoulders or upper chest, or is taken from overhead LiveJournal-style, she’s gonna’ be a big girl. Men fib about their height. Women often try to conceal their weight. After meeting one too many women with “average builds” who are 5’ 4" and probably pushing 200 pounds, I’ll usually ask those writing with the symptoms of Internet disease to assure me they’re not larger than me. I usually get the runaround. Pit me.
Instant chemistry. I found that with women i the real world, they’re more willing to take the time to determine if there’s any “chemistry” or any potential of a relationship; the standard “two or three dates if it’s not a disaster” rule applies. With women I meet from match.com, they seem to expect instant chemistry; if’s there’s not massive fireworks in the first two or three minutes, there’s not going to be a second date, no matter how perfect the date may seem, no matter how smooth conversation may flow. I think it could be because if things aren’t quite perfect, there’s hundreds of other suitors waiting in the wings.
Online dating for a typical man isn’t impossible, but prepare to put a lot of effort into it, and to face a lot more rejection than in the real world.