Still no replies on the Repub party being worse losers than Hillary because NOT ONE of them could keep Donald Dump from hijacking their primaries and their clusterfuck of a party???
Does the word crypto-republican ring any bells?
I think just about any Republican would have beaten Hillary Clinton.
The Republicans were hurt by an overcrowded field of remarkably similar candidates. I mean if Donald Trump wasn’t there, it would have come down to who LURVED Reagan more and who could hate Obama more without being overtly racist. a dozen candidated split 80% of the vote and surrendered 20% to Trump. That 20% was enough to attain front runner status and by the time the primaries came around, it was enough to get you more than half way to winning primaries.
Dummi, are you still there?
I just thought you should know that there is a big false flag operation right now trying to distract the nation from the fact that hillary was such a bad candidate, and thus diluting your message.
nvm
Well, since you won’t accept my very gracious apology… go eat a bag of dicks.
Your premise was that Donald Trump was going to be a puppet of Russia because he was subject to threats of physical violence. You go on to say that everyone is subject to threats of physical violence. Do you realize how fucking retarded this statement is? Why isn’t Obama a puppet of the Russian mafia? Or Hillary? Are they the only people on the planet that are actually immune to physical violence? There is nothing unique about Trump in this regard.
Now you say that Trump is going to be blackmailed by the Russians, because he participated in orgies and made some hookers fuck the bedpost of a bed that Obama slept in? Are you fucking kidding me? Mr. Pussy grabber is going to compromise the interests of the USA to avoid embarrassment?
Depends on what they got.
If they got pics of trump and ivanka gettin it on, then yes, he probably would compromise the interests of the US to avoid that getting out.
Otherwise, you are right, he will only be compromising the interests of the US for his own personal gain.
If you recall it was your idea that concern about donnies ties to russia were about “russian mob” and “violence” against him. You conflated this with his other risks in order to dismiss them all, and repeated over and over that it was retarded, and a paranoid conspiracy. Right right. OK Vlad. Good job.
But the fact is that I don’t care if donnie is a victim of violence, and never said I did. He’s an adult and can take his own hits. I said that I cared about him being compromised, which it was clear he was a high risk candidate for. His opponent was not. In this whole thread you haven’t admitted the obvious fact in front of your face. You prefer to say “retarded” a lot. Are you working some issues out? Is it easier than talking about the real?
Now why don’t you address all the other ridiculous things you have said? Are you on some kind of zombie repeat tape?
J Edgar Hoover is dead, and so hillary bad!!!. Just admit you’re stupid. It’s the first step but you have to take it.
Yes, and pics of him blowing Obama while taking it up the ass from Hillary would be embarrassing for him too and about as likely.
You are rewriting history in your own mind. I think you might even believe what you are saying but the clear chronology is that Dasmoocher brought up the notion that Donald owed money to Russia and that the Russian mob were going to enforce the collection of that debt. He was kidding. But you jumped on it and took it seriously and said that the notion that Trump is immune to threats of physical violence to himself or his family is part of the Trump strong man meme. So you were in fact saying that Trump was going to be a puppet of Russia because the Russian mob was going to break his thumbs or something. That is retarded.
How is he a high risk candidate? Because he owes money to Russia or something?
Please, don’t be coy. What is the obvious fact in front of my face? I only say retarded because your ideas, posts and arguments are retarded. If there is a better word to capture the near congenital levels of idiocy it takes to even entertain the conspiracy theories you are spouting, then I am not familiar with the word.
Like what? I am the soul of reason.
I don’t think Hoover has anything to do with it. I think Hillary cheated during the primary. I think the DNC was in the bag for Hillary and Debbie Wasserman Schultz did everything she could to ensure that Hillary would be the nominee. I think Hillary got paid a lot by plutocrats to give secret speeches to plutocrats where she said the exact opposite of what she was saying to voters. I think Hillary was arrogant enough to spend all her time schmoozing with the limousine liberals in San Francisco and New York and racking up a huge money lead over Trump while allowing Trump to rack up a huge electoral vote lead over her on election day. and so Hillary bad.
I don’t think anyone is going to buy the notion that I’m stupid and you’re not. But keep trying, there are enough liberals on this board who think I’m a conservative anarchist and enough conservatives on this board who think I’m a liberal fascist that I’m sure someone will agree with you one day.
Why’s that, you don’t think they have cameras in russia?
Or would a sight of a naked trump break even the most high tech surveillance gear?
No not really. So I hastily took dasmoochers post a little too seriously, but only as an opportunity to reflect on my worries about donnies vulnerability on the world stage. But I have been making my actual point, not your straw fantasy of me, for pages and pages now, and it seems to be just a distraction from your actual goal to obfuscate and not discuss. He is baby man and a weakling with delusions and strong ties to russia. He has a history of corruption, subversion, and self dealing. He is high risk when it comes to russia. He could do something about it by releasing his tax returns, but he refuses. That’s also high risk. You really arguing that point?
Why would I want to make a point about violence befalling him when I don’t actually care what happens to him? You are the one harping on this one thing forever and ever. It’s not a good look for you you know. And for someone who identifies as a minority you sure use the word “retarded” a lot. It’s not like you don’t have a choice about your own language.
The fact that you’re digging in so deep means that you do admit that trump’s moral issues do relate directly to your point about “hillary baaaaad! Nothing else matters”
donnies depravity is something that you seem to be in denial about and your pushing back is strange.
but I agree that the Republican field of candidates sucked, which is how Trump was able the nomination.
Then, the Democratic party candidate sucked as well, which is how Trump became the President-elect.
I would say that Hillary Clinton, with the full backing of the DNC, sucked MORE than any given Republican candidate who only had the backing of their personal followers. She had the entire party apparatus, and could not beat him. Trump didn’t even have the full backing of his party - with key members either withholding or giving tepid support.
It was hers to lose, and she lost it.
I’ve been away at a work-related workshop and I haven’t had the chance to follow the latest Russian influence over Trump news, but fuck, substitute Russian *government * for Russian *mob *, and replace violence with being compromised, what I called my wackadoodle theory is getting legs.
That doesn’t make me feel any better.
What they may have on him is up to speculation, and since I’m still catching up to this, I don’t know.
That’s exactly what I did when I read your original post, automatic substitution of terms. It seemed obvious to me that it was in the cards. But here’s the thing: I also posted cites for links between Putin and the russian mob, Donnie and the US mob, and the the us and russian mob in Brooklyn (being involved in gas fraud and latterly medical industry fraud.)
I see no difference between the russian mob and the government for our purposes here.
You do realize I was parodizing Breibart News, but some aspects might actually be true!
Honestly no offense but I didn’t read you too closely. It was a trigger for me. I had his russian problems on my mind and I thought I needed to lay it out. I figured others would be thinking on those lines too. And they are.
Well, yesterday I read, for the first time the entirety of Hillary’s “deplorables” speech. Getting past the description of that half of trump’s supporters, she also talks about the other half. Not the most artful phraseology (this is Hillary after all) but there is clear understanding there.
Part of the problem is that Democrats are particularly vulnerable to being taken out of context because they try to give context. Context requires nuance, and nuance gives room to those who feed the selective listeners.
The exact same thing shows up with Obama’s “god and guns” quote and the “you didn’t build that” quote as well.
Hillary Clinton wrote: “But the other basket – and I know this because I see friends from all over America here – I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas – as well as, you know, New York and California – but that other basket of people are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they’re just desperate for change. It doesn’t really even matter where it comes from. They don’t buy everything he says, but he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won’t wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroin, feel like they’re in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well.”
And that (the bolded portion) is a soundbite that might have made a difference if her campaign -or any of the genius PACs- had bothered to feature it. Hell, HRC’s speeches and policy statements were full of stuff that spoke directly to those needs and fears of ‘white working class Americans’ but you’d never have known it if you just watched televised news and political ads.
Apparently you are unfamiliar with the Atta-boy Erase Principle: One “oh-shit” erases all prior “atta-boys.”