[Campaigning]If someone votes for me for something, I’ll think about offering to send them a dollar.[/Campaigning]
Too late for this now, but shoulda had a “Most ignored” and then all the people who never get mentioned in favorite poster threads or at RL meetings coulda voted for each other.
Your Official Cat Goddess since 10/20/99.
“[A]gainst stupidity the very gods themselves contend in vain.” --J.C.F.S. as quoted by H.M.
Okay, is anyone else having a TON of trouble getting to the voting pages? I could bring it up at work today, but it was really slow. Now, I can’t see it at all. whimper I mean, come on! I need to see if I’m winning “Most Chat Addicted!”
“You are sweet, kind, and considerate… Like a grown up boy scout with tits!” - Brian, aka SDMB’s one and only Satan.
Hey, Opal - Sorry I didn’t contribute anything earlier.
One suggestion I would recommend is to change the Best Scientific Explanations categories to Best Expert Explanations. We have a lot of expertise (law, immigration, web design, theology, etc.) on the board, and it seems artificial to only recognize the scientific experts…
Sue from El Paso
Experience is what you get when you didn’t get what you wanted.
Good idea Majormd–I changed it to Scientific/Expert how is that?
Sorry about the slow load times. Here is the way the pages are created:
you nominate someone, and that writes a line to a huge data file… each line of the data file is something like this:
name=Suzeanne|category=59
Ok, so then on each of the voting pages, each question looks like this:
112) Best Laymen’s Explanations<A HREF=“javascript:POPUP()”><IMG SRC=“nominate.gif” WIDTH=“23” HEIGHT=“25” ALT=“Nominate someone!” BORDER=“0”></A> <A target=_new HREF=“http://fathom.org/polldata/pollcheck.adp?poll=dope-page12&question=112”><IMG SRC=“vote-results.gif” WIDTH=“27” HEIGHT=“24” ALT=“current results” BORDER=“0”></A> <BLOCKQUOTE>
<% guestbook.display /tm/112.txt /tm/nom.dat %>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
That says to display data from /tm/nom.dat (the nomination datafile) using the specifications in /tm/112.txt, which says this:
So it goes through the data file and finds everywhere that the category=112 and puts in that html code… the <gb>name</gb> means insert a field from the data file–the field called “name”. <br> is a carriage return.
So you see… it takes a while for it to go through that process, for every person in every category on every page… every time someone loads the page. Sorry about that, but it was the only way I could have the thing be automated.
Has anybody else noticed problems in the voting tally?
For example, I went in and voted for somebody. Then I came back the next day and that person showed no votes. So I voted for them again. Then I came back the next day and that person showed no votes.
Hmmmm. (I’ve e-mailed Opal about this and a couple other problems I saw, but haven’t heard back.)
David: I have noticed a problem with the tallies too, but I can’t fix it without my husband’s help, and he’s always working (yesterday was a Saturday–not even a regular work day for him–and he went in at 8am and didnt get home til after 3 in the morning…) Hopefully in the next few days he will have some time to peek at the script and see what is going on.