Is there anyone else out there who isn't interested in the Super Bowl?

I think I have “watched” exactly one superbowl in my life. I went to a party at a friend’s but mostly I stayed away from the tv and snacked and talked with others that weren’t watching. We may have watched the commercials but I don’t think they were as big a thing back then.

I do like all the shows that talk about superbowl snacks because “hey, snacks!” but zero interest in the sportsball game and the commercials I can catch online at any time. I may catch a few minutes of the puppy and kitten bowl if we have time, because only people with no soul hate puppies and kittens. :stuck_out_tongue:

Well, in my defense, I really do try to call it that universally, since “Football” is a terrible name for describing the game. To be honest, the name bugged me even when I played it.

It’s the right name to use because it’s the name that people around you will understand (assuming you are American). How can calling something by its name be a terrible thing to call it?

I had no idea you were even referring to football. I thought you were just expressing disdain for sports by talking about some other sport with a weird name. That doesn’t seem conducive to conversation at all. And of course once you said you do it essentially to irk people, that really feels like it’s more about being smug than just not caring.

I call football notbaseball. The Super Bowl marks the end of baseball’s preseason.

I’m not. Never had much interest in sports but a few video games I don’t mind. Never watched the Super Bowl nor does my wife. I never understood how people get so hyped over big games and perhaps never will. Overall I find watching sports on TV to be very boring.

“Football” is an ambiguous term without context. I’ve never used “hand-egg” outside of the context of a discussion about the American sport, but you’re the first person who’s expressed confusion at what I was referring to.*
If I’ve got any disdain or smirk, it’s for people who think a sport (or a stranger’s enjoyment of it) is somehow important or says something about the person’s view of classes in our society. Possibly I have it for the people who think that I’m somehow damaging the game by calling it an unusual name, but that’s a new one to me.

*In fact, I just used it at the liquor store, and the guy didn’t blink.

You mean, like hockey, tennis, badminton, golf, and countless others?

If you ever meet one of those people, be sure to let us all know. In the meantime, jsgoddess and I will be here rolling our eyes with everyone else.

I wasn’t aware that there were Canadian, Austrialian, American and international games with those names that all have widely varying, completely incompatible rules.

Nice try, though.

You weren’t aware that there are multiple versions, age groups and leagues with differing rules for all those games? Color me surprised.

Sure, educate me on the widely varying, completely incompatible rules between say, golf or tennis in the U.S. and Europe. I doubt I have to educate you on the differences between European and American “Football”.

I’ve never played golf or tennis, and don’t have much interest in their rules. There might be such rule differences, but I doubt a casual observer such as I could be expected to know them.

Hell, even though Hockey has different rules in the NHL and Olympics, the players don’t have any problem moving between them. I don’t think you could drop an American player in to the Australian game and have them have any idea what to do.

Who said the differences were the same? The terms are still ambiguous. If I’m going to a tennis match, you don’t know if it’s male or female, doubles or singles. But I can clarify for you, just as easily as I can clarify which football I’m talking about.

I realize that the English language doesn’t make you all warm and fuzzy inside, but bucking against it in a juvenile manner doesn’t help your cause.

Mark me down as not caring about the Super Bowl too. :smiley:

Will probably watch something on Netflix, or… Hey, is Downton Abbey new Sunday night? I missed 2 weeks in a row; am I going to be confused?

Happy weekend everyone! We may get snowed-in here. :frowning:

You’re the one saying there’s an equivalence.

I don’t care if people who love and respect hand-egg are made all warm and fuzzy by my use of the word, I’ve never met anyone who’s made a convincing argument that they were confused by the term when used in context. You’re the one who came into a group of people who obviously don’t care about the game and tried to enforce some sort of linguistic regime.

No I’m not. I’m saying it’s ambiguous, and you’re arguing that point.

I’m not trying to enforce anything. I’m explaining why we’re all laughing at you.

No, I said “Football” was ambiguous, and you said that hockey, tennis, golf and badminton were the same way. “Football” doesn’t even tell you the shape of the ball, much anything else without context. The other names tell you a lot about the sport, comparatively.

Oh, you thought I took hand-egg seriously? Hint: We’re in a thread about not doing that. Laugh away.

I said they were all ambiguous. They are.

I love that you’re actually defending your elementary school terminology. I love it even more that you claim to be doing so in an attempt to clear things up for the world.

Yeah, the amount of time you’ve spent earnestly defending it really makes this ring hollow.

But you at least implied that it is to the same degree. You have utterly failed to show they are.

I love that you’ve come into a thread to defend the honor of precious hand-egg.

Well, I can’t let someone so wrong go unanswered. It’s probably a habit, like cigarettes.

No I didn’t. You only keep saying so because your entire argument hinges on it.

Again, I have done nothing more than point and laugh at your twee little term.

Says the guy who is fighting clarity with a made-up and unheard-of term, in the hopes of making things easier to understand.

So, in light of that, this is a boring conversation. Enjoy your hand-egg. I’m gonna go watch hockey.

They’re all ambiguous to some degree, yes. I never said they were more or less so.