gulp gulp
The shifting coalitions and wars in 1984 did not really represent enemies as such or any real threats to the state, rather they were opportune ways to rid society of excessive industry output and to focus the attention of its population. In the context of this thread the most obvious thing would be that you were on about the Islamic terrorists who killed Theo van Gogh. But even so, to say that Islamic terrorism in America is merely an opportune method for some sinister manipulative American government to manipulate its population (or as an outlet for US industry to blow off its excessive industry production) and in reality does not represent any real threat is to go into conspiracy overdrive, to completely miss the point and to be more than a little condescending of the 3000 deaths on 9/11. Whereas if you really meant to say that “the only terrorists who count are Islamic terrorists because the only terrorists that actually invaded US soil to attack were Islamic terrorists” that would be to completely miss the point of 1984 and the snippet you took from there.
However to stay in your hijack, there’s no debating that 9/11 was a singular spectacular and destructive terrorist attack that demanded a strong response. And why is it you think that America should be especially concerned about threats from terrorists or other kind of threats that don’t directly involve the US itself? Sure it would noble if the US took all the troubles of the world upon its shoulder, but why would you expect it to? Does your country? Mine doesn’t.
I just started on a new aqvavit if you want to join me. Skål! gulp gulp