I disagree with your post. Part of drug seeking behavior is repeatedly seeking and taking drugs. But beyond that, your contention that people’s posts should be taken in isolation is ridiculous. The reason we are not allowed socks here is specifically so our community and members will be judged on the whole of their posting history. It works IRL as well. I get it, you like Stoid and will white-knight her. Fine. But don’t expect all of us to go along with your fantasy world.
I have a few other posts to respond to, but I wanted to get this out of the way before it took on a life of its own:
You have confused me with someone else. Not only have I never been proven to have plagiarized anything, I have never even been accused of plagiarizing anything.(Who plagiarizes forum posts? That’s weird…)
The same for lying. The only accusations of lying I’ve ever seen leveled at me (until this strange thread) have been casual expressions of doubt “That seems really hard to believe…” “I don’t think that’s true” Not accusations of a lie, and certainly nothing that has been pursued and proven.
If anything, the Stoid noise around her arises more from my truthfulness than anything else, and for “truthfulness” read frankness. I’m very bad at being secretive, discreet or false…I have massive boundary issues because it requires way more maintenance to do any of those things than to simply be utterly myself. The chips that fall as a result are information, and yes, I take it in.
So, in summary: everyone is entitled to hold any opinion of anyone at any time, no matter what those opinions might be. But it is factually untrue to state that “Stoid is a proven liar and plagiarizer.”
Thank you very much. I really appreciate it when people have a change of heart and the courage to say so.
Last night I was going through my videos and I came upon one I had utterly forgotten about (more like blocked out, since it was only a month ago)…I took it during the last hours of her life at the neurologist, capturing something she was doing because the tech person had mentioned he wanted the neurologist to see it. It’s very sad, but it makes clear that whatever else, my dog had a severe neurological disorder.
As far as the likelihood of two dogs with seizure disorders, it’s not that strange, as others have said.BUt in my own situation, my first dog with it had a likely cause. He was a 6 week old puppy I took in to foster after he had been kicked in the head and blinded in one eye as a result. My then-vet (who was by far the greatest vet I’ve ever known, in every way…) was fairly certain that the blow in puppyhood, which was obviously severe, led to the development of seizures when he was about two. He died at five as a result of complications from the drugs he was taking.
I actually am a nice person, ya know. I never thought of myself that way until the last decade or so, but it turns out I really am. I know, came as a total surprise to me, too.
As for delusional? Probably, but so far I’d have to say it’s working for me in the big picture of my real life, so I’m not going to sweat it.
I’m glad you recognize the importance of “According to her own words”, you just didn’t get them right:
[QUOTE=Stoid]
I try to arrange a barter with him for some work, that became weirdly awkward, he was supposed to finish fixing the gate he’d worked on, never showed. Contacted me randomly over the next few months to borrow $2 for laundry, $1.50 for the bus, a couple of Xanax cuz his scrip ran out. All fine.
[/QUOTE]
In other words… he began to do some work. He didn’t finish the work. Then he came by to borrow Xanax to be replaced when he had his own prescription refilled. Work before Xanax. Work stopped before Xanax. Xanax was loaned, to be replaced.
That is not “paying a guy to do yard work using her prescription meds”. Therefore I have never dealt drugs, by any stretched definition.
Not so much, at least not by any definitions I could find: (just google “drug abuse” and you will hit all these in the first ten or so… i bunched these so as not to have them confused with my quoting dopers…)
The closes thing I could find is bolded down a few quotes.
Wise words indeed. Ahem.
Nasty? Let’s look to my own words again, since of course they are the only thing you have to work with as you inform others of the facts they are misstating:
(by the way, that last was the post directly before your response to me in that thread)
So, according to my own words, absolutely nothing indicates that I was ever “nasty” to my vet. I had planned to present her with my arguments, never got the chance. I have written a letter I have yet to give her. At no time was I ever “nasty” to my vet.
Can we assume that you now recognize that you have been accused of plagiarism?
I suspect this is the same as the plagiarism. You have certainly been accused of plagiarism, as has been seen. So the “I have never even been accused” part is clearly false.
Likewise with the “I have never been accused of lying”. This is also false - I have accused you, truthfully, of lying. IIRC your lies, the one I pointed out, came in one of the Zimmerman-Martin threads, where you lied about how you were not speculating.
You also lied, more egregiously but by omission, in one of your threads about your lawsuit. Again IIRC, you left out a paragraph that disproved one or more of the claims of your lawsuit. I believe treis pointed it out, and in any case, since the appeals court dismissed every one of your claims, I think it can be taken as shown that you were being other than truthful in that case as well.
Whether or not it is fair to call what you have done “lying” is up for discussion. I have no doubt that you actually believe what you say when you say it, no matter who badly it conflicts with reality, But you are someone who deals with reality by refusing to acknowledge its existence, when it is inconvenient to one or another of your delusions.
I won’t bother with cites, until we see how and if you respond to the bit about plagiarism.
You seem like a smart enough lady so why is it that you don’t see that these mile long cut’pastes “proving” you’re right and casual admission of prescription pill sharing make you look like a pill poppin’ nutter?
So you were going to pay him something to do yard work, he hadn’t done it, but he came by wanting to borrow money and acquire pills from you, but the pills would definitely not have gone his way if he had done the work? Sure, technically you’re not a drug dealer, if we don’t look too deeply at what happened and avoid using our brains to connect the dots, so you can have that one. But your giving him Xanax that was prescribed for someone else is definitely prescription drug abuse, and calling it ‘loaning’ implies quite a bit about how you handle those sorts of things.
Google search for prescription drug abuse turned up: Prescription Drug Misuse: MedlinePlus You’re trying to use the definition for a DSM-IV diagnosis, which your quotes reference, but that’s not the common definition.
Your thread title accused the vet of killing your dog, you accused her of behaving unethically, and said various other lengthy and unkind things about her that it’s not worth the effort to go back and reread then quote. Yes, you were nasty to the vet. You did it behind her back, but that doesn’t change that you made rather serious and unfair accusations against her, which is what I used the word ‘nasty’ as shorthand for. I’m sure you can post half a dozen quotes defining nasty in a different way then I used the word, though.
I tried but the site has been taken down. But basically (IIRC) Stoid was dealing with some medical issue (toothache?) and linked to a webpage she created asking for money to help… oh, and if you have any spare Vicodin please send it along.
IIRC, she didn’t purposely link it here. Bizarrely (and coincidentally to this current issue) she was posting puppy pictures and she just slapped them up on that address’ server. Someone backspaced her link to discover the “campaign”’ homepage.
