Oh man, I have an assload of quoting to do. But it’s all 'cause you guys are so damn helpful. Thank you! I must say I felt like I was watching the film with you silently in the room – with all the info you’d shared with me, helping enrich the experience immeasurably.
Ooh. Thanks, that makes sense. (And you’re the only one to answer this question, interestingly.) But when you say ‘ancestor’, how far back are we talking? For that matter, what’s the timeline again for a) when the Ring was lost, b) when Smeagol found the Ring, and c) when Bilbo nabbed it?
Who, the actor? Really? Very cool. To answer your Q about the extras, I’ll get 'em next. I’m on the two-disk Netflix plan, and my other disk was already used by a different obsession.
First, thanks as always for your highly descriptive and engaging relation of Tolkien lore, Chronos. I am amazingly impressed at how well versed you guys are in the mythos.
Now, re: the eagles. They’re really not magic? They seemed way bigger than normal eagles, though. They picked up the halflings with one foot! I know hobbits are small but they ain’t that wee. Plus, Gandalf seemed to open a locket or something and allowed a teensy little eagle fly out, which appeared to turn into a big mofo on its own. Or am I misunderstanding what happened? Maybe this is just the movie and in the book they’re normal eagles?
Awww! I like that. Faramir/Eowyn = OTP! I really do wish we’d gotten to see them get together or at least interact. Don’t these directors know a good pairing when they see it? Plus, they’d invested enough time in Eowyn’s character, showing her get hurt by Aragorn, that you’d think showing her find love elsewhere would be a nice ending to her arc. I don’t suppose there’s anything more of them in the Director’s cut, huh?
Heh, yes, that was very good, especially McKellan’s reading.
He looked very familiar, one of those “Hey! It’s that guy!” types. I didn’t have patience to wait for the cast list (I was really tired last night!) so I didn’t look him up yet.
Thanks for the explanation re: Osgiliath. That makes much more sense. I must’ve spaced on that exposition, because I don’t remember hearing that it was such a doomed situation (at least, before Gandalf started harshing Faramir’s buzz).
And also your explanation re: Denethor and Faramir vs. Boromir is certainly illuminating. Despite this, I get the sense that Faramir didn’t resent his brother; at least, from what little Faramir mentions of Boromir in TTT there seems to be genuine love and loss there. Am I right? Usually there’s some tension between a favored son and the black sheep. I’m glad that wasn’t the case, as this is more interesting and less cliched a take.
Oh absolutely. That is precisely why she’s such an excellent depiction. (Big credit ps to the actress.) There’s any number of “kickass women” who take up swords or guns and fight with fiesty abandon or grim purpose. But it’s not realistic for a woman or anyone (like Merry) who’s never actually been in a combat situation to be all businesslike and unafraid. I always, always find it more impressive and powerful when someone feels fear and does what needs to be done anyway. That is true bravery, to me. Much more sympathetic and believable and just plain awesome.
(To digress to OOTS again: it’s why in the team-up of O-Chul and Vaarsuvius to attack Xykon, I find Vaarsuvius much more genuinely courageous. O-Chul never seems afraid for his life, he just forges ahead, and that just ain’t human. V has terror in those little round dots of india ink (to quote Charles Schulz), but gamely goes ahead with the attack anyway. Loved it.)
Definitely. That’s funny, as a writer I’ve done something similar (hiding a character’s identity) but it was important for a mystery to maintain the disguise. I don’t think I’d have done so in this case. It’s the difference between shock vs. suspense. Tolkien apparently used shock, giving the readers a few moments of “whoa,” while Jackson gave us suspense – we know this inexperienced, terrified woman is going into the most dangerous territory she’s ever known, and our hearts are in our throats with every hoofbeat of her horse, waiting for something horrible to happen.
Of course, I may feel differently when I read the book. A great author can pull off quite a lot.
LOL, y’know, I didn’t even think of the issue that the eagles present, as far as potentially solving the Ring problem. Glad to see this is something others feel too.
So a different version of Elvish than they were speaking throughout the film?
Still sounded like a cantor on a High Holy Day to me.
The who with the what now?
Er, some of these are blending together in my mind. Which charge of the Rohirrim? The one with the king and Eowyn as they fought against the orcs and later the elephants? An amazing battle. I usually don’t like combat scenes much, not because I’m squeamish but because they all tend to seem so similar: lots of grunting, clinking armor, thundering hooves, dirt everywhere, etc. But with several characters to follow, and such original weapons (as in elephants), and overall excellent direction that didn’t cut too quickly from action shot to action shot, I found this exhilerating and scary.
The Army of Evil … were these the ghosties or do you mean the bad guys? Yeah as you see, I’m still kinda slow.
I wasn’t thrilled with “I can’t carry it…” because by that time almost every word out of Sam’s mouth was making me cringe (sorry), but “You bow to no one” was definitely one of my favorites of the film. The meek shall be risen, and the great shall be humbled.
Hmph. Seems like a stretch on Elrond’s part to me. Elrond seemed to be implying some special connection, sorta like Frodo or Gollum’s. But maybe I just misunderstood. Which, let’s face it, is quite likely in my case. (Don’t lie, you know you were thinking that!)
I agree. A lot of things people said seemed to come from nowhere, or seemed to lack motivation, and usually I assumed: “Okaay, I guess we’re supposed to know that from the book.” This is one of those cases, clearly. Like I said, I know it’s a tough line to walk in adaptations – you want to have things be meaningful for those who love the original source, but you also need to make sense to the ignorant buggers like me in the audience. I really think it’s better to err on the side of making the film self-contained, so that characters and events make sense on their own. So no fair assuming the audience will “guess” stuff like past relationships (e.g. Gandalf/Faramir/Denothor). No one wants to waste minutes of precious film time in exposition, but shit needs to make sense, y’know?
Heh. I’m usually that way too. Honestly, I’ve had the disk out for two weeks now, but I’ve been putting it off because I wanted the experience to last. I really wanted to finish the trilogy but I didn’t want it to end. Y’know?
That much is clear! Do you have a favorite of the films? Was there anything you felt was lacking? What were the biggest changes? (These questions are for everyone, btw!)
Yeah, I have to say, the new explanations you guys are giving me seem pretty much the opposite of what I got from all the discussions about Elven lives and loves and how Elrond was worried that she’d be watching her beloved die…
What a wonderful turn of phrase! Just wanted to highlight this. It sounds like an Irish proverb.
OOH that’s kinda harsh. Love it.
So it’s not really death, it’s more like the Golden Door Spa?
Er … Palantir … is that what the orb thing was?
Even if this is true, wouldn’t it have been more humane to use a sword rather than, like, immolation, which is only the most painful form of death there is? Hey, don’t get me wrong, if Denethor’s miserable and wants to go out in a literal blaze of glory, goody for him, but does he really have to burn his helpless boy while he’s at it?
I said FUD and I meant FUD.
Different from the book tale you related earlier? Cool. Happily the Extended Version is available on “Watch Instantly” on Netflix, so I don’t have to wait too long.
Well, considering the decided lack of estrogen, I can’t say I’m surprised. Eowyn more than made up for it in the last film though. She’s totally my girlcrush.
Sad. He didn’t seem to have a life outside of the Ring journey, unlike the other hobbits. In a way it seems that he knew his story was over.
Mmm I like that comparison. And I’d forgotten Gandalf said that about the wound, so it certainly does foreshadow his never healing (physically or mentally) from the experience.
Well, of my favorite characters in LOTR, three made it (Eowyn, Faramir and Pippin) and two didn’t (Boromir and Frodo). That’s pretty good, for me. Hell, that’s positively miraculous. (I was 0 for 3 in Harry Potter!)
Yes, that’s it exactly. In fiction, you don’t end your villain’s reign offstage with a line of dialogue. That is just begging for a Shocking Comback in the finale!