Then it’s a false impression. Why not just respond to the things I actually say?
Congrats, OP, very rarely can a Pit thread backfire on someone so badly that virtually everyone who replies to it are all in agreement that they’re a complete idiot.
I think before we can judge how honest Clinton is as a politician, we need a standard to measure her against.
Perhaps the OP can suggest a few US politicians who have been subjected to the same level of scrutiny and investigations without anything being found?
Just want to point out that she didn’t run a classified email server. She ran a server for private email to which a few classified emails were unintentionally sent.
Q: How many emails “disappeared” under the Bush Administration?
Find the answer to that question and carefully consider it before saying that Hillary belongs in prison.
Ugh
OP, which point are you trying to make?
Hillary should go to jail because
[ul]
[li]she broke laws concerning national security[/li][li]the Federal Government’s IT department were so slack about setting her up with a secure email server, she used her own for years before they even thought it might be an issue[/li][li]nobody enforced security protocols on her[/li][li]she’s a traitor, even though there’s no indication she made secure info available to hostile forces[/li][li]she’s a Democrat and stays married to the GOP’s worst nightmare before Obama[/li][/ul]
You imbeciles will never get it. The people voting Trump don’t give a shit about the right, the GOP, the left, Democrats or really much of anything at all associated with government and politics. Call them stupid, fearful, deplorables, whatever - they don’t care. They are sick tired of the big fat bungling bureaucratic mess they perceive as Washington D.C. these days and everything that goes along with it. If Donald Trump appears to be the only alternative, so be it.
It’s that simple.
There don’t appear to be nearly enough of these sick tired individuals to elect Trump, based on the polls. And it’s getting worse for Trump.
Are you prepared for a really, really big Trump loss?
Yes, I can see why someone sick of bungling would support Trump.
Why would they think Donald Trump is a viable alternative? That’s the deplorable (or stupid) part. I can almost understand why a person is is fed so much crap over the past 20 years about country going to Hell might want to shake things up, but to view Trump as even a potential solution to this “problem” illustrates a profound ignorance or indifference.
“Showtime is over. We are not electing an entertainer-in-chief. Showmanship is fun, but it is not the kind of leadership that will truly change America,” Christie said of Trump [before Trump beat him].
Not one single agent is named who was either part of the investigation or who is “ready to revolt.” The only agents quoted do not appear to have been involved, and neither presents a case that there is a revolt brewing in FBI ranks.
The article provides not a shred of primary evidence that there is unrest in FBI ranks over the probe.
Half the article is an opinion piece.
You need to use your critical thinking cap here.
The New York Post? I think that makes you Klauss doesn’t it?
I know. That description was hilarious. We’re all so sick of the inept corruptness of Washington, that we’re going to vote for a multiple-bankrupted buffoon who advocates sexual assault, displays not an ounce of self-control or discretion, has no platforms beyond magical thinking, incites violence and advocates jailing his adversaries, is seen as nothing but a joke on the worldwide political stage and is a racist to boot. And those are probably his endearing qualities.
Yep, when I’m fed up, I always choose a worse option than the one I’m already dealing with. Sense, that does make. / Yoda
You may or may not choose to recognize the totality of a very complex, far-reaching scenario, based on numerous sources, most ALL of which do not appear here.
That’s using the critical thinking cap, based not on one article or a few disparate details.
Think about that.
Well, just because you read it in the NY Post doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not true.
- Said to me by the wife of a NY Post editor a few years ago.
Interestingly, it’s not even the truth that is in question here. Many truths on this topic are well known and substantiated. It’s an issue of fitness for the position of the President of the United States. Job#1 in that post is National Security. Anyone who wants Billary playing fast-and-loose on that topic is truly an imbecile.
I think this nails it. There is a sizable minority in this country who are utterly impervious to reason, and they’re going to vote Trump no matter what. Fortunately, getting 35% of the vote will amount to a historic landslide loss.
But to try to convince those of us who are previous to reason that voting Trump is a good idea is a fool’s errand.
And what would you call someone who is spoon-fed information from, and stolen by, Russia then repeats it back verbatim without fact-checking it?
Just about anything but “Mr. President”.