I bet that’s not all he’s missing.
Great! I really don’t give a shit who anyone VOTES for. That’s your business. Just help me pit all these apparently willfully ignorant or cognitively dissonant weasels who won’t admit the truth. :smack:
And we all know the world of high stakes national security revolves around Army Specialists. :rolleyes:
Charlie Sheen thinks so.
Ok. The truth is that you are a loudmouth bore and apparent idiot.
USAF isn’t the Army. Not paying attention to small details like that might mean you are missing a lot of the story on a lot of issues.
way to fight ignorance. not.
Ignore facts, like the fact that carelessness in handling classified info is never prosecuted unless paired with deliberate action for profit, spying, etc, if you want.
Air Force cryptographer here … yes … my next duty assignment would have been Cheyenne Mountain Complex … that’s ICBM launch codes in hand … it would have been me who decrypted the Executive Order to launch … who the fuck did you think did all this busy work … generals, officers … we don’t waste college graduates on code books now do we?
I feel your pain, Uber, I really do. However, I have lingering questions about what actually happened. It is certain that the FBI stating that Hillary’s e-mails contained top secret information was a far graver compromise than anything in the e-mails. If there was top secret information in those e-mails, then why would the FBI tell the Chinese to go through all them pentabytes of data and find it?
The fact that top secret information was compromised is itself top secret information … so I have to ask, just how “top secret” were those e-mails?
I think the case to throw Oliver North into military prison the rest of his natural life was far better than the case against Hillary. We certainly had a case to throw Richard Nixon into prison for a while. As far as I’m concerned, these two men individually did more damage to the United States than the sum total of all that Hillary has been accused of.
If they are true, then these are qualities of character I’d like to see in our first woman President. She’s good at building trust so when we turn our back on her she can set the knife in. That’s what all the Presidents have done, however I don’t see the rant here about a recent man President authorizing torture, or the man President who was ultimately responsible for those e-mails …
This is just because she’s a woman … right?
Watching the world burn should be reason enough.
I’m not sure this really counts as my first Pitting. He doesn’t even know my name. sobs
I thought I’d do a little research on his (?) user name.
Uber - denoting an outstanding or supreme example of a particular kind of person or thing
Archetype - a very typical example of a certain person or thing
Right away we see the cognitive dissonance that typifies his posting. An apparent grab for uniquness, coupled with a complete marriage to lack of originality of thought. A veritable Pinocchio attempting desperately to pass as a real boy.
Run along now. The grown ups are talking.
Yes, but without that airtight excuse, without that fig leaf to cover up my hollow core, it just wouldn’t feel right.
So how y’all enjoying that categorical ignoring I mentioned earlier?
What you “think” you know and what we now know about Billary’s email server are 2 completely different things. Also, I would ask the “Specialist” if any of the very very few people he is aware of running afoul of the law in this respect were running classified email servers on the Internet. But I don’t have to, because the the answer is “no,” not even close. Same as the difference between what North and Billary did - not even close in many respects, including the specific laws broken AND the intent to do so.
OK, so what law do you believe was violated? Be specific. Bonus points if you can provide an example of another person who has violated that same law, and what their sentence was.
Why not both? Surely the OP deserves our sympathetic contempt.
I suppose if you ever accidentally post anything factual and substantive before your banning, I’ll learn about the material from someone who’s worth spending the time to read.
If he’s an idiot, I’m willing to cut him a break on the “liar” bit-I figure he just can’t help himself.
It’s the impression I’ve got from your post here, and a few others you’ve made on the subject.
Wait, the OP never said anything about throwing her in prison,
jail is rather a different thing than prison.
I don’t have a subscription to your newsletter, so I have no idea what special information you may have. Have you seen these e-mails? I didn’t think so. How much experience do you have with OPSEC? None? I wouldn’t have guessed that.
Let’s see, Major North, in his capacity as an officer of the USMC, did sell advanced weapons systems to the enemies of the United States. He then pocketed a part of the profits and used the rest to help fund paramilitary groups that Congress explicitly forbade be funded with government money.
First, we have theft of United States money … I’m surprised you didn’t know that was illegal. Then we have violation of the US arms embargo against Iran, definitely illegal. Destruction of of government documents … that’s called obstruction of justice.
Meh … they’ll welcome you with open arms in Mexico after the election … it’s actually really safe there for Americans … you could even get a job teaching English down there … if you’re any good at that they’ll worship you like a god.
It is about Hillary being a woman or you would have denied it. It’s funny as anything when you threaten to ignore people, do you know how stupid that makes you look? I didn’t think so. Run along and play now so the adults can talk …