jarbabyj; I propose a sig bet

A simple bet, the loser must adorn their SDMB posts, for one month after the end of the regular season, with the sig of the winner’s choosing. The wager is thus:

I say the Packers will finish ahead of the Bears (suck) in the newly christened NFC North for the upcoming 2002 season. If the Packers finish ahead of the Bears (suck) then I prosose your sig should read:

"Brett Favre is a football god…and the Bears still suck"

Of course, should the Bears (suck) win the NFC North then I will use the sig you so designate. I don’t think I need to mention that the sig should not be offensive in the usual ways (racially, religiously, gender, umm, genderly, sexual oreintation-ly, etc.).

Do you accept?

In fact…I DO.

Your buddy Brett’s gotta break down sometime, and instead of Pooping in girl’s Dorm Rooms, perhaps your draft picks should study the play book.

See you later…PACKER

Wow, what a terrible bet. jarbabyj gets stuck with a crappy sig if the Bears finish lower than the Packers, and Tretiak gets stuck with a crappy sig if and only if the Bears win the division.

What happens if the standings at the end of the year go:

Vikings
Bears
Packers
Lions

???

Good question, Munch. I wondered that, too. However, it won;t make any difference…My Colts are winning it all this year.

Wait. You’re right. The Bears have to finish first? Or just better than the Pack?

I need this cleared up before I shake on it.

So hey, jar, you up for some more football bets with me this season?

OK, to clarify, whichever team of the two finishes ahead of the other, so if they finish 1-2 or 3-4 so be it. Screw the Vikings and the Lions, that don’t really matter.

I assume these terms are acceptable.

What about ties? Do the playoff tie breaker rules apply?

Haj, Charger fan.

Am I allowed to admit that I only opened this thread because of a spooneristic misreading of the thread-title?

2003 Draft position for the respective teams should be the clincher.

OK, yes, Tretiak. I accept.

And now lno and I have a bet going for week One:

The All New and “Improved” All Rookie, All Stranger Viking team vs. The Chicago Urlacher Bears.

Loser writes a minimum 500 word essay on how f-ing great the winning team is in their lj.

YES. FOOTBALL HAS BEGUN

Tell me lno, are the Vikings wearing name tags on the field this year?

Just because three of our four starting defensive backs are new doesn’t mean that our defense doesn’t know each other’s names. The first week of practice was full of one of those “Get to know you” games where everyone sits in a circle and says something about themselves, and the next person has to recite what everyone said and their name before taking their own turn.

And just because the offensive coordinator has trimmed down the playbook to about six plays in total doesn’t mean that we can’t still rack up the score. If Culpepper throws an interception that’s return for a TD, that’s technically still a passing TD.

And just because our first-round pick is still a holdout and has now been demoted from his starting position doesn’t mean that Culpepper will be scrambling for his life on his bum knee.

You’re on, jar. And even though the Vikings will be on the road, they’ll still win. I hope you like praising Randy Moss, 'cos you’ll be doing it for 500 words.

Just remember sweet cheeks. It’s spelled U-R-L-A-C-H-E-R.

Wow. I didn’t know we had any of those left!

Just a thread bump to remind jarbabyj…T minus 28 days.

Whaddya mean?

The Pack have clinched the North…they will finish with a better record.

End of bet.

Let’s see that sig change now I say. :wink:

Well, they could end up getting banned form the league, or have a Michigan style forfeiture of victories…maybe…

… guess this was a truly rhetorical question, huh? And to think I made the mistake of picking up Culpepper in my fantasy football league.

[walks away shaking head]

Does this remind anyone of the theory that says that if a Cubs game is rained out it counts as a Cubs win because they didn’t lose?