say you’ve known someone since they were a preteen and you have kept an up’and’up’ relationship with them through the years. Now they are age of majority and they want to get with you.
OK, Never had any issues, but what if the girl was the daughter of a former employer.
OK, What if you were friends with the father of the girl and what if you intended to marry the girl?
What do you mean by an “up’and’up’ relationship”? The only reference to this I could find was about women having relationships with men who were seeing other men on the side.
Stephen Sondheim used this as part of the plot in A Little Night Music. I personally find large age gaps in relationships to be pretty gross, unless the usual power difference between the parties is somehow not present. So it’s pretty scammy.
I’m not sure hypothetical means what you think it means.
This whole story doesn’t hang together well. A girl who is currently at least 18 and whom you have known since before she was 13 is hitting on you, and you are thinking in terms of marriage?
More than the circumstances, I find the idea that you are contemplating marriage with someone when your relationship currently is still at the “hitting on” stage to be nonsensical.
So, divorcing myself from whatver the realities of your specific situation may or may not be, if someone had been grooming a preteen for five plus years, just biding their time until the girl was “legal,” that would be pretty sleazy.
But if someone had a longstanding acquaintanceship with a young person over the years and then found a mutual and unexpected attraction after the younger party had become an adult, I would not find anything objectionable in that. To anyone who would find such a situation disturbing, I must protest, and cite as my proof of the acceptability of such a relationship the strange case of George Bailey and Mary Hatch.