Kate Bush 101 for Americans (Ask the Kate Bush fan)

First, she’s not related to the American politicians.

Second, practically everyone in the world (outside America) who knows anything about music knows who she is. She’s had hits and top-of-the-charts albums all over the world.

Americans have been deprived, with only a smattering of airplay, usually on college/alternative radio stations, and only a handful of airings of her distinctive videos.

Third, she’s influenced more modern female singer-songwriter-musicians than any other female musican. A generation of female artists, ranging from Tori Amos to Happy Rhodes to Dido to Sarah McLachlan to Goldfrapp to Bjork sing her praises and have openly cited her as a prime influence. Male artists ranging from Peter Gabriel, Tricky, David Gilmour (who discovered her), Jeff Buckley, John Lydon and even Big Boi of Outkast adore her music.

Fourth, she hasn’t released an album in 12 years, and advance word is that the upcoming double-album Aerial is stunning in every way, well worth the wait. Fans are buzzing. She’s not likely to get any more airplay in America now than she did back in the day, but anything’s possible.
Myth: She’s not a wild-eyed, wild-haired airy fairy hippie. She’s a sensible doctor’s daughter from Kent, and the personas she created for her videos are those of the characters in the songs. Since what Kate did was so original, telling stories in songs (most are very cinematic), some people never even realized that the videos went along with the stories, and had nothing to do with Kate herself.

Myth: She’s not afraid to fly. She has an inner ear problem and it hurts her. She has been to America a few times for personal appearances and vacations, but she always took the Concorde since it was faster and cut down on hurt time. I don’t know if she’ll come here at all this time, since the Concorde is gone.

Myth: She’s not a recluse/hermit/Miss Haversham. She had incredible fame (hard to believe if you’re an American who has never heard of her), and didn’t much like it. For her, it’s always been about her music, and the endless round of interviews, personal appearances, parties and photo shoots (before Diana came along, she was the most photographed woman in England) took time away from her music. She wanted to get her songs heard, and have the clout to be able to control how they were recorded and presented (thus producing her own albums and building her own studio to record them in), but fame as a byproduct has never appealed to her. Between albums, she’s a normal person, who loves puttering around in the garden, British comedy shows and being a homemaker, raising her son. Her music is so odd and fame is supposed to be so desirable, that some people (British tabloids) just assume that anyone who would walk away from fame and not want to go to all the latest parties has to be daft on toast. She’s not. She’s normal. They don’t get it.
Several articles have appeared in the UK recently, with several more to come, that give an idea of how her “comeback” (though she never went away) is being received. If you’re interested at all, but don’t know much about Kate, they’re worth reading.

The Observer

The Independent

The Scotland on Sunday
From that last article:

I guess I’m one of those “intense” fans, but I have her to thank for so much. I first became a fan in 1981. I had heard her sing on Peter Gabriel’s 3rd album, in the songs “Games Without Frontiers” and “No Self Control” but became a fan when a fellow Gabriel fan sent me a tape with several of her songs on it. I knew within the first 30 seconds of the first song, “Wuthering Heights,” that I’d found what I was looking for in a female artist. I met my husband when he put an ad in a local (then Kansas City) music paper saying “Kate Bush fan with records, videos, would like to meet other Kate Bush fans to trade.” I didn’t know any other KB fans, and he didn’t know any other KB fans, so when I answered the ad we jumped at the chance to meet. We started out as friends and are still together and still very much in love 23 years later. We’re both still huge Kate fans, the kind who have posters on the wall and who fly to England for fan conventions. We’d gotten out of the fandom in recent years, but never wavered in our love for her music.

Without her I wouldn’t have my soul mate, I wouldn’t live in Chicago, I wouldn’t have so many great friends all over the world, I never would have gotten my radio show, and I never would have discovered my lyrical soul mate and 2nd favorite female artist, Happy Rhodes, who’s meant so much to me.

Any questions? (besides, are you daft on toast?)

Where can I order the @#$@# new album? Amazon has it listed as an import, at $47. Is it not going to be released in the US?

Oh, and one more question. Where’s my copy of Hounds of Love? I found Lionheart, Never For Ever, and The Dreaming, but I know I had Lionheart on CD but I can’t find it anywhere.

Hmmm… maybe I had it on vinyl. But I no longer have a turntable.

Anyway, if you can point me in the direction where you last saw it, I’d be thrilled.

Er, make that “Hounds of Love” on CD.

stumbles off to get more coffee

It is going to be released in the US on November 8. Why Amazon doesn’t have it yet, I don’t know. I’m about ready to pre-order from Australia or Japan or Germany. I know for sure the Australian version is supposed to come in a Digipak with a 25-page booklet. That may be the case for all the copies, all over the world, I don’t know. Australia’s just the first to give details.

I’d love to find any country in the world that doesn’t frickin’ copy-protect their CDs. Degrade Kate’s music on purpose just to treat fans and potential fans like common criminals? Grrr! Every fan in the world will want the actual product just to have, and to support Kate. They say the degradation isn’t audible, but it’s the principle of the thing. I can’t reconcile my long-term boycott of copy-protected CDs with not buying a new Kate Bush album, and they count on that. I hate record companies. They’re evil.

We will buy the LP too (for the artwork) and if we have to we’ll rip mp3s from that. Gleefully. I love LPs, they sound so much better (especially if they’re English or Japanese). Too bad they’re such a pain in the ass.
Keep checking back on Amazon, I guess. Or support a local record store, or small business online music store.

Oh, and you loaned out your copy of HoL to that one friend that one time. You know, that friend who moved away and never bothered to give you back your stuff. Don’t you hate people like that?

Another fangirl article on Kate Bush, this one from The Guardian. The author was allowed to listen to one side of the new album. Here is a partial quote from the article:

Barbara Ellen
Sunday October 2, 2005
The Observer

Bush has a double album coming out called Aerial. It’s been 12 years since her last one, The Red Shoes; two decades since her masterpiece, Hounds of Love; 27 years since her debut, The Kick Inside; and an astonishing 31 years since David Gilmour of Pink Floyd heard one of her early homemade demos and recommended the gifted doctor’s daughter from Bexleyheath to EMI, where she remains signed to this day.
It is to EMI I go to get my sneak preview of Aerial - or at least part of it. I’m allowed to listen to one side - I choose the first - so long as I sit in a room at the EMI offices with a man guarding me, presumably in case I try running home with it, thereby committing the crime of trying to listen to an album properly. Despite these shenanigans, first impressions of Aerial are as good as one hoped. It is in fact vintage Bush: a melodic, organic sprawl of wind, sea, seasons, time passing, dreams, secrecy and revelation, all mixed up with a sound that seems to segue smoothly on from The Red Shoes and The Sensual World.
Elvis Presley seems to be the subject of the first single, ‘King of the Mountain’ (why does a multimillionaire fill up his home with priceless junk?). Joan of Arc pops up in the stunning, atmospheric ‘Joanni’. Most intriguingly, there is a song called ‘Bertie’ where one hears a whole new Kate Bush - a mature, doting creature both energised and sucker-punched by mother love. ‘Where’s that son of mine?’ sings Kate, adding breathlessly, ‘Here comes that son of mine.’

You say these are myths, so you’re saying she IS a wild-eyed, wild-haired airy fairy hippie recluse who’s afraid to fly?

(I know what you meant, just being anal)

What do you think of this?

Oh, and did the video to Experiment IV and Running up that Hill combine inside your head while you slept, turning into one Super-Nightmare?

I have all of those on vinyl and CD. :smiley:

(And they’re all on my iPod, too. :wink: )

If anyone wants to know, my favorite Kate Bush phrasing is the way she sings ‘Everytime it rains’ in Cloudbusting.

Oh wait, this is an ‘Ask the…’ thread.

I’ll put that as a question to Equipose.

Equipose, did you know that my favorite Kate Bush phrasing is the way she sings ‘Everytime it rains’ in Cloudbusting?

Did (or does) Kate Bush believe in orgone? Or was she just taken by the idea of what it would be like if Wilhelm Reich’s theories were right?

Ha! You’re absolutely right. I realized it after I posted. Sometimes a 30-minute edit window would come in very handy.

I think that I’ve been spending the last week since the cover was revealed using Sound Forge to come up with possibilites of what that waveform might be. I’ve put in whole songs (Kate’s and otherwise) then then studied the waveform to try and come up with something similar. I was especially intrigued when the true song titles were revealed and one of the songs is called “Aerial Tal” which is a reference to Indian music. I’ve studied the waveforms of tabla music and vocal music with tabla (such as Najma, Shoba Gurtu and Sheila Chandra) and come up with nothing.

It’ll be easy to find what the waveform is once the album’s released. I’ll put all the songs, individually and separately, into Sound Forge and find it. Before the fact though, it’s nearly impossible. Waveforms don’t tell you what notes are sung or how they’re sung. Anyone who tries to reverse engineer the waveform on the cover of the album will end up with a wahwah mush.

I also think that I’ve spent way too much time with Paint Shop Pro extracting letters and numbers and faces and words out of the cover. I’ve already seen the Kate and the KT symbol (it’s covering her mouth) so anything after that is her just f*cking with us, me going crazy, or there’s something really there.

I’ve stopped looking, but this makes me wonder:

I can’t be sure, but I don’t think she thought much about Wilhelm Reich one way or another. She’s always been pretty grounded so I tend to doubt that she ever believed in orgone or the cloudbuster. The song “Cloudbusting” is based on the book “A Book Of Dreams” by Wilhelm’s son Peter. It was about how the child viewed his father, not about Wilhelm himself. Kate used references such as when the elder Reich made Peter bury his glow-in-the-dark yoyos because he believed they were radioactive. Peter wasn’t in awe of the cloudbuster, he just thought it looked really cool and was a great way to spend some time with his father. When Wilhelm was arrested and taken away it affected Peter to the core. I don’t think he ever recovered after his father died in prison. As far as I know, and I could be wrong, he’s been pretty much a recluse ever since.

So, Kate responded to the emotion of the book, the emotions of the child, and wrote the song based on that, not the work of the father. I can’t speak in absolutes, but I seriously doubt she ever delved into Wilhelm Reich much beyond Peter’s book.

Nope, got me there. I thought sure it was “Little light, shining.”

Equipoise… if you’re describing musos, I think people know who Kate Bush is. Anyone who pays attention to Tori Amos, or Sarah McLachlan knows who Kate Bush is. Nobody brings the mood of a song out like our Kate - no matter how I feel, “Cloudbusting” makes me feel anxious, “Babooshka” makes me feel cold and in need of warmth, and “Running Up That Hill” conveys excitement.

I just found out a few years back that she worked with Alan Murphy, one of my all-time favorite guitarists. Good on Kate and great to hear she is coming back!

How does Oh England My Lionheart make you feel?

Nekkid pics?

Yeah, why can’t we have KATE BUSH NAKED google ads?

I read recently in an on line UK paper that Kate Bush is the 2nd wealthiest woman entertainer in Britain, right behind Annie Lennox. Good for her.

There was a rumor that she appeared nekkid in Playboy in the late 70’s.

Not true.

Hippy Hollow, I agree with all you say except that I run across people all the time who love music and have never heard of her, or have heard of her (perhaps while reading a Tori review) but have never heard her music and know next to nothing about her.

Thanks Mr. Blue Sky.

The model’s name was Kate Simmons, and the fast-spreading and still persistant after all these years rumor that it was Kate Bush is indicatave of the thoughtless sexism Kate has had to endure while trying to get people to listen to her MUSIC. That makes me angry. It’s really no wonder she wanted to get away from that crap. I don’t reflect that anger onto anyone here, but rather the British tabloids or whatever snarky idiots started the rumor in the first place a couple of decades ago. I still don’t know what the point of starting the rumor was. I don’t blame people for bringing it up if it’s something they’ve heard. It’s good to get the truth out if it interests people. I’m just boggled that it does still come up. I should have added that one to the Myth list.

(Btw, I have nothing against women who pose for magazines or appear in adult movies, if it’s their choice. The rumor only upsets me because it was started as a means to mock Kate and have people not take her seriously as an artist.)

And yes, she did have some early sexy photos taken at the behest of the record company at a time when she didn’t have much say over her image (she learned very quickly that she had to speak up), and yes, she’s written songs about sex and lust and sensuality, but cheesecake photos and lusty lyrics are a far cry from stripping for a men’s magazine.
CBCD, you’re right about her wealth. She was business-smart from the very beginning of her career. Before her first album she and her family set up a corporation. She pays herself a salary out of it. As far as I know she’s always owned her own masters though I’m not 100% sure about the first few. Certainly from Hounds of Love on she has. She also doesn’t have the usual record company contract. She doesn’t have a contract at all in the sense that they “own” her. They don’t own one bit of her and she owes them nothing. After The Dreaming she built her own studio and records her music without the record company hearing a note until it’s finished. When it is finished she leases it to the record company and they distribute it. No one really knows the fine-point details, but I’ll bet whatever Kate and EMI have in writing is a fascinating read. For instance, I don’t know if she pays for the artwork and pressings or they do and she reimburses them. Or what. That’s all very secretive, probably because few other artists in the world have such a unique deal.

They are the top two female pop artists in my heart too. I have heard the new single and it just makes me smile. Definitely classic Kate.