Keep talking Rush. Keep it up, please, please, please.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090306/ap_on_go_co/limbaugh_kennedy_2
Just keep stomping on your microscopic dick.
Now may I suggest that the “War on Drugs” be renamed the “War on Druggies, like Rush Limbaugh”.
If Limbaugh isn’t an atheist, he should definitely consider the advantages.
I don’t want Rush to fail.
I just want his liver to fail.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/13/senate-lion-kennedy-roars-national-healthcare/
Rush wins again. Thank you all for making yourselves look lazy, careless, stupid, and malicious.
You’re as clueless and insensitive as he is. There is a lot of legislation that is known by the author(s) or primary sponsor(s) name. “Memorial” is for someone who is dead. Ted Kennedy is battling brain cancer but he is still alive and working.
We know where Rush gets his audience.
What Spartydog said. Lots of bills are named after their authors. It’s the “memorial” part that’s objectionable.
Yes, but by the time any plan reaches fruitation, he’ll probably have lost his battle with brain cancer. It was an insensitive remark, no doubt, but it has a decent shot at being prophetic too.
Prophetic? Kennedy might die, but I guarantee the bill won’t have the word “memorial” in it.
Oh, don’t underestimate the Senatorial love for mawkish and empty sentimentality. After the Pubbies fight this tooth and nail, and do everything in their power to water it down to inanity, if it still passes and Teddy is gone, they’ll stand there and flow the tears crocodilian in honor of that great, great American, Teddy.
Just like the watermelons and monkeys and other BS that the 'Pubs have thrown out there. “Hey, don’t be so sensitive. Have a sense of humor. Blah, blah, blah . . .” Fact is, it’s rude, insensitive and clueless.
Hey, I hear you mom has inoperable cancer. Think your brother will get home from Iraq before she croaks? But then, maybe he’ll get killed first. Ha, ha, ha! Isn’t that a knee-slapper? Cummon, laugh a little. Don’t be so touchy.
A question. Limbaugh had a mild addiction to a prescription drug. He openly admitted it, sought treatment for it and kicked the habit.
Ted Kennedy is a drunk who murdered a young woman and got away with it. He has never admitted it, sought treatment for it or kicked the habit.
Why, then, do you continually refer to Rush’s problem and not Kennedy’s?
Chappaquiddick was in 1969. When was Rushes long drug habit revealed?
Oooh, I know! I know! Its because liberals and lefties are, like, total hypocrites! Where’s my cookie?
And I’ll just pass on your self-serving definition of a “mild” addiction and your unique understanding of what constitutes murder. You already know that’s crap, and if you aren’t already embarrassed by it, nothing I’m gonna say is likely to make much difference.
I believe it was just a little bit after he said, “And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.”
Yeah, but its different. That’s not hypocrisy, that’s post-modernist irony.
I’m, um, I’m having trouble, er, picturing this. If someone can stomp on his own dick, one of two things is going on:
In your memory, I add “hair-splitting” to my first post.
And FTR, I don’t listen to Rush. But if Obama feels the need to target him specifically, Rush is saying things that threaten Obama. And maybe it’d be worth my while to find out exactly what Rush is saying. Of course, that goes double for all the dishonest people who criticize him WITHOUT EVEN FUCKING LISTENING TO HIM AND DEPEND ON THE INTENTIONALLY INACCURATE REPORTS OF OTHERS.
Ted Kennedy is an awful human being by any reasonable standard. I’m ashamed and embarrassed that his name will be on the most important piece of legislation of my lifetime.
Well, with any luck Congress will have the opportunity to pass the “Rush Limbaugh Memorial Bill to Remove Ted Kennedy’s Name from Legislation” as soon as possible.
Would the “Ted Kennedy-Mary Jo Kopechne Memorial Health Care Bill” satisfy both sides?