IIRC, he told Locke that Juliet was a mole. The recorder just gave him proof.
Well it’s a non-starter because that’s all I could come up with. It’s really just a name for neither (1) nor (2). It’s hard to see how Ben benefits from Sawyer being able to prove that Juliet is in on another kidnapping plot unless he wants her dead. It’s also hard to see how Ben benefits from the kidnapping plot being known in advance . . . unless . . . it’s more complicated. So yeah, I just threw that in there because I’m not convinced of either (1) or (2) but couldn’t come up with anything better.
You mean you aren’t? :eek: And I’ll bet you have no way to contact this ship either.
I hope they try something like The Lost Experience again. I didn’t start watching until Season Three (after a summer of catching up). I’d heard about the commercial clues in Season Two, but obviously missed it altogether. The very first episode of S3 I had pen and paper in hand just in case a suspect 800 number appeared.
Great way to get people to watch commercials - sheesh
Added to that, if he had been ‘wished out of a box’ why is he “The Man From Tallahasse”? If he was conjured by Locke’s subconscious (or something), why would The Others know or care the guy had anything to do with Tallahassee?
And I am really looking forwards to next week. We watch on iTunes, so we don’t get the previews, but the title alone brings up all kinds of possibilities. All of them have been mentioned before, but An episode centering around Ben titled The Man Behind the Curtain allows so many ways for the Wizard of Oz to play into the plot. I’m assuming this is quoting the Wizard’s famous line, “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.” When we first met Ben, he said his name was Henry Gale - Henry Gale was Dorothy’s uncle in Kansas (Aunt Em’s husband). The real Henry Gale crashed on the island when his balloon blew off course - which is how the Wizard ended up in Oz. I often hear Australia referred to as Oz, and Oceanic flight 851 originated in Sydney. I hope they have fun with it - for all I know, we’ll learn that Hurley’s part Lion, or that part of 851 crashed on Ben’s sister.
I don’t get the feeling that there’s an uprising within the Others, in particular. I think that they are all or mostly all there because Ben has successfully conned them into staying and doing as he says. They probably all hate Ben and don’t want to help him, but they’re each afraid of all the other Others who might do what Ben asks at any given time.
or Jacob is some sort of inanimate object (maybe that’s what Ben keeps in that bag) the podcast definitely implies that the MTBC might be Ben and that Jacob probably isn’t what we’ve been led to expect. But the official synopsis says: Ben begrudgingly begins to introduce Locke to the secrets of the island, beginning with the mysterious Jacob. Meanwhile, Juliet’s secret goes public.
Forgive me if these are really dumb questions, but I read the whole thread and still am not sure. Why did Ben and Alpert want Cooper dead so badly? If they knew Locke couldn’t do it, why did they want Sawyer to do it (which they clearly did, indicated by the file Alpert gave Locke)? If they just wanted to undermine Locke in the eyes of the Others, having him simply fail to perform would have been enough, and the Sawyer bit would have been unnecessary. I’m confused.
Ben says something about Locke needing to let go of his past. Maybe once Cooper is dead, Locke will stop obsessing about him, and can fulfill his glorious destiny or something. Just guessing.
And the way to do that is by publicly humiliating and further demoralizing him WRT his father? It seemed so belittling. I wanted Locke to say, “Fuck you, Ben. I’m not going to let my evil, murdering father turn me into an evil murderer, nor am I going to let you. You want him dead? Kill him yourself, asshole.” Then turn and walk away.
If anything would have undermined Ben’s authority and made everyone watching with doubts about Ben cheer, it would have been something like that. As it is, Locke looks like an easily manipulated wimp. That’s unlikely to change when he comes in with Cooper’s body next week; that’ll just indicate that he was a successfully manipulated wimp.
My feelings exactly. If its really true that the other Others could only respect Locke if he were willing to murder the person who is the source of his troubles, then it seems to me there’s no moral ambiguity about them at all. (This is despite the fact that the writers have said that we are not supposed to be able to easily categorize them morally speaking.)
