Lower share of female regulars. What to do?

This is 100%, certified, bottled-in-bond wrong. Not one single solitary word that I posted said, implied, or could reasonably be inferred to suggest that anyone should stop posting, and your allegation that it could is false.

You make such a claim about my post, in the teeth of this kind of thing -

And you have the gall to accuse me of trying to shut down discussion.

Here’s a thought - how about No? How about if I post my opinion, and you post yours, and we can agree, or disagree, as the case may be?

Guess what - people get to disagree. And if my disagreement makes you mad, that is not my problem.

Regards,
Shodan

Shodan really couldn’t make it clearer that he wants to pat the womenfolk in these threads on the head and tell us to go back to our knitting. Posters like him are a big part of the problem.

It’s interesting that the default tactic to deal with a disagreement is misframe the argument then seek allies to pile on personal attacks. Forum mob justice to ensure compliance to arbitrary social norms. :frowning:

I thought that men and women were equal. Why is this board “hard to deal with” for women and not men?

Equal does not mean identical.

Perplexing, huh?

I thought trolling wasn’t allowed in ATMB.

Have you read this thread…or any of the other threads where this subject is being discussed?

You realize that there is a report button?

We really need to see that everyone gets the memos from now on.

How do you know nobody used it? You’re not a mod.

Me as well.

I believe that inside every malformed OP is a reasonable OP struggling to get out. Unfortunately, some OPs are so stunted that their better aspects remain unhatched.

Agree that this is a balancing act.

There’s another consideration though. The IMHO forum trends towards the anecdotal. And in some cases an OP can on net facilitate ignorance more than it impedes it. Hypothetical examples might include, let’s gather some anecdotes about black dudes and five dollar bills, or what happens when a hawt babe enters a place of work?[sup]1[/sup]. Scientists take care not to produce biased datasets: this sort of sampling is anything but. Ignorance fighting fail.

Yes, yes, I actually think that both could have been framed properly, though some topics are more challenging than others. But methinks IMHO has more scope for editorial intervention – something familiar in any journalistic environment. In the past the consensus at this message board was to let malformed threads live and good speech conquer the bad. That’s one way of doing things. But there are others.

None of the examples of sexism I’ve seen put forward so far have involved GQ or GD. OTOH, racism in the past has very much been an unfortunate component of those forums. I trust that will be revisited at some point, like everything else.

Also, methinks I just outlined a lesser consideration, relative to concerns about board environment.

[sup]1[/sup] To be absolutely clear, I misrepresented the thread titles to show clear if hypothetical examples of ignorance augmenting OPs.

You are correct. I can only see the accusation of trolling. I suppose, though, the rules apply to some and not others?

Wow, my irony meter is smoking now. It may blow.

So far three reports of trolling using the button. (none of which were you).

Yeah? Perhaps because I didn’t think it was trolling?:smack:

While, octopus was right, accusations of trolling do not belong in this forum. Use the report button,

But neither is Jr Modding. Use the report button

I did. What happened next?

Curious posters who are as clueless as myself might reference this reddit thread: Reddit - Dive into anything

Something that generates an ATMB thread. That’s the way it works here.