Ok, more like bandwagoning, but you still get my point.
Yes, I mock the type of person who says things like “history” should be spelled “hxstory” to get the “his” out of it as much as anyone. But despite Lucy claiming that this is what he is against, and therefore against all feminism, he isn’t even doing that–he isn’t merely attacking the straw (wo)man of feminism, he is attacking the basic “men and women have equal rights” base of it because as I mentioned earlier part of what he hates about feminism is women having jobs.
Well then here is something I want you to read to know how it accompanies my point
But before I post is Theguardian a trusty worthy source in your book?
Right up there with the Onion. Best there is.
The Guardian as in the UK newspaper? I have no problem with it as a source. But if it is an article about some stupid quibbling about the spelling of words or terms used and you wish to present that as being the meaning of feminism, then kindly print it out, roll it up tight, and shove it up your ass, because I have no need for it.
Changed my mind, this one is imploding, I think.
Here is an article I want to show
But before you think I am using it biasedly, here is another article that accompanies it
Check out also the pdfs.
And he continues to serve them on a silver platter. :smack:
…
This is the best post you’ve made to date.
In any context, I’m not your ‘bud’, pal.
Listen, you neckbearded shit for brains, feminism advocates for egalitarianism and humanism. Your both sides argument is like saying both the Allies and the Germans killed people during WWII.
Because you’re an imbecile. You reason like an imbecile. You write like an imbecile. You dress like an imbecile and you ride a bike like an imbecile. What are you? You’re an imbecile. Yes you are.
Mr. St. Quicksilver, I have a few questions for you.
Are you enjoying yourself? If so ignore the rest of this please as sometimes ranting and raving is a great deal of fun.
Why are you feeding the troll?
Do you realize he is probably masturbating over the frenzy he appears to have gotten you into?
Mostly I’m having a great deal of fun ranting & raving. Some trolls just get under your skin, you know? And so you’ve just got to draw the line: Up with this I will not put!
Sounds good, carry on sir, carry on.
I had some cookies the other day. Peanut butter. According to the cookie-sharer they were made with only 3 ingredients. Anyone know this recipe?
They were better than CRACKERS.
My Daddy would’ve loved them.
Could of been his favorite, I think.
Imma lose a little respect for you, for letting a troll this terribly, terribly lame get through to you.
You’re better than this.
Fine I will prove to you I hate a bit of my side
Notice how a lot of these anti-feminists are also complaining the rise of male grooming is part of the agenda to feminize men? I disagreed
And what is up with the buzzword ‘‘metrosexual’’? So now putting some cologne before starting your day is considered effeminate? What’s going on here?
More people are aware of the idea of men’s grooming, so … the demand has increased.
To hell those saying taking your grooming more serious is effeminate.
Perhaps. 
Such a dedicated little troll. Good boy!
I found one. Could it have been this one?
Ingredients:
1 cup peanut butter
1 cup white sugar
1 egg
Directions:
Preheat oven to 350 degrees F (175 degrees C). Line baking sheets with parchment paper.
Combine the peanut butter, white sugar and egg. Mix until smooth.
Drop spoonfuls of dough onto the prepared baking sheet. Bake at 350 degrees F (175 degrees C) for 6 to 8 minutes. Do not overbake! These cookies are best when they are still soft and just barely brown on the bottoms.
And congratulations on following the time-honored tradition of posting recipes in the Pit. 