[QUOTE=Drain Bead]
And here’s why I thought circumstances warranted–I found it pretty incredible that someone could forget how pedescribe was outed, and why storyteller made a good move.
[/quote]
Let’s be perfectly clear here, I did not forget what happened with regards to the whole pedescribe situation: I simply failed to connect that the congratulatory post was, in fact, referring to storyteller’s success arguing his case for pede.
[QUOTE=Drain Bead]
But it makes sense when you consider that Omi No Kami could be on the same team as pedescribe–once you see a teammate go down, you may forget the exact circumstances as to how it happened.
[/quote]
I don’t believe that for a moment - if I were a member of a scum team and knew who my fellow teammates were, I would endeavor to keep an extremely close eye on what was going on, knowing that my interactions with whomever got caught would be subject to instant and somewhat merciless scrutiny.
[QUOTE=Drain Bead]
You just know you have to bus them ASAP, which is why ONK was one of the first voters for pedescribe.
[/quote]
I was one of the first to vote for pede because I lost track of time, plain and simple: I hadn’t been keeping regular track of the game, and when I finally worked my way to the then-front page, I couldn’t remember the day/night cycle and convincing myself that I was scant hours away from being modkilled for not placing a vote. I reviewed everyone who had caught my eye, considered Santo, and ultimately decided that pede was the most suspicious player at the moment. I voted for him while waiting for Storyteller to answer my question about his tactics, and as others chimed in and began jumping behind the pede wagon I failed to find any reason to change my vote.
[QUOTE=Drain Bead]
All the rest that came after has just been more fuel for the fire. I was going to go back to voting for Oredigger toDay, but the gears started spinning, and I feel that I have only one option.
[/quote]
Oh, come now. I thought ShadowFacts was being surprisingly aggressive, but his reasons were fair. Hal chimed in and supported the reasoning, and since I can’t prove that my initial post was innocent, poor wording, and not a slip and honest-to-goodness scumtell until we can investigate at least one of the two bodies in question, I have no problem with it.
What I do have a problem with is bad logic: if you’d stepped up and said “Sure, I think there’s something sinister behind the way you phrased that,” I would have been more than happy to leave things at that. However, I find the reasoning you’ve personally cited to be weak and highly suspect excuses to vote for a lynch.