The second sentence there indicates that you have read NAF’s claim, and understand the implications and limitations of it. It is immediately apparent that he can only evaluate a given statement as true or false. Why would you possibly think that sentence 1 is one that would qualify? Sure, it’s a common idiom, but not an applicable one. In mafia, no one’s townieness goes without saying. It’s kinda the point fo the game.
Here you attack someone for calling you on your evasion, which you then follow up with an evasion. You have to know that simply saying “Yes” is meaningless.
After a half dozen people ask for it directly, and not one but two evasions on your part.
Not buying this. It’s exactly what I’d expect someone caught evading to say.
Well, see, you’ve already admitted that you switched up play style in order to avoid attention. Granted, that can be a good thing for town, but are you really saying you see no scum benefit in it? If you’d even posted a couple times more than you did, you might have slid by unnoticed, so it very nearly worked.
Man, does no one else smell mafia investigator there? I’m willing to beleive that BLam didn’t know his target would get a PM as well, or he wouldn’t have claimed it. But, wow, hideeously evil? How do we just let that go?