OOG/
Meek- FWIW, I really enjoy playing with you, and your presence here has been noticed and missed. I think you are a good player, and would love to hear more of your thoughts here…
/OOG
I also want to put Choie back on the table for voting Diggit a “claimed Mason” yesterDay.
Vote: Choie
She never responded (I think she’s a she) why she was voting Diggit knowing that he has claimed Mason. From my POV, there’s not a good reason to vote him unless you don’t believe his claim…and I didn’t see her say that.
**Choie’s **dead, bro. She was also town.
Caprcious and arbitrary… Seinfeld much? Anyway did you even read my post about the Stan thing? I said I wasn’t defending anyone, it was more of a caution against this infightg and hasty random witch hunting. Whoever argues hardest gets lynched. I see where this is going though so if I go out Storyteller please note that my last official act before being lynched will be to write I told you so on my red shirt. I’m on my non BBCode friendly phone browser so I’ll wait till I get off work to post my blue votes.
Okay I’m dumb…I went back a few pages and was reading yesterday’s cases, and thinking about where I wanted to vote today… I saw my vote on her yesterday and said “Ah HA I thought this was off yesterday”
Unvote: Choie
WHAT!!?? Please go back and re-read Day 3 and when you find that I never so much as quoted or mentioned you in a post (except to explain how to bookmark a page near the end of the Day) I expect you to retract that vote.
Also please re-read the case I made against orthohedron. The ‘defending scum’ part is just a small portion of why I’m voting him.
It’s cool man, but it sucks that it took a couple of votes to get you to post and (promise to) vote. Can you tell us all why you didn’t vote for the last two Days?
Vote wombat99
Same thing (almost). Has a few more votes than ortho; has been otherwise invisible.
I’m starting to think we’ve stumbled on a non-participatory scum conclave, folks!
And don’t forget Skeezix.
@ orthohedron, RE: his vote on USCDiver
I believe USCDiver is using “known scum” as “we-now-know-to-be-Known Scum.” It’s a bit disingenuous to hold “current” knowledge against him when there’s really no other way to play the game. Using people’s flips against those who advocated/defended that player is a key part of this game. I’d consider voting you for this smudge.
As for using flips against people… TexCat accused me of defending Stanislaus too much yesterday. It’s a fair claim, and a reasonable justification for a vote. I do find it interesting TexCat hasn’t renewed that vote, as she would be more “right” than ever; from her perspective, a [?]-aligned Astral defended Stanislaus pretty strongly. If it was scummy when we didn’t know Stan’s alignment, surely it should be twice as scummy now?
For that reason, I’d like to
Vote TexCat
Add in all of the other reasons I’ve voted for TexCat on top of this. Playing from my phone, so I can’t link to them right now.
It’s been a fairly quiet day. I’d be willing to lynch wombat99 or orthohedron if that’s our lynch, but I’d still really prefer TexCat.
Not as strong a case, but still, I have to agree
Vote Red Skeezix
Also, Babale hasn’t voted at all on Days 2 and 3? What’s up with that?
Unless my voting chart missed him (unlikely but possible), he’s lurking pretty hardcore. I second Johnny Bravo’s request for more info from him, and I’d consider murderizing him via lynch as well.
Also, it’s Day 4. If our investigator has three more quality results (that is, results on people who are not dead), I’d consider claiming now. Further days increase the odds of death dramatically, given that there are two or three night kills per cycle. If one or more of your results are not useful (peeps be dead!), I’d consider staying silent. My reasoning: It’s more beneficial to town to have a new set of “cleared” people (barring Alpha investigation) than it is to stay silent and hope for “one more werewolf find.” As always, claiming is entirely up to you, and you should take my advice as just that: unrequested advice.
Also, I’m not sure what you meant by this part. You were the one who initially used those words, not me!
Two more. We’ve only had three nights.
Otherwise I agree with you - if the investigator dies with knowledge of two townies, that’s a really serious blow for the rest of us.
**Vote Babale
Vote Skeezix**
Are they not playing? I’m cool with lynching 'em.
Votes go in blue.
Right. Two more. Who said anything about three? 
It’s more of a toss-up in my mind, then. I’d consider revealing if I had two results, absolutely stay hidden if I had one (or none).
Sorry guys…the weekend ate me. I’ve managed to catch up in the other game, where I was almost a full day behind, but I’m still catching up here (where I’m only *half *a Day behind)
DiggitCamara,
Do you have anything to offer us Today except for “lynch the lurker”? As the closest thing we have to a confirmed Town, your thoughts on players might be useful…so far all you’ve done today is provide the Scum a list of “probably not Masons”.
That sparked a thought. Diggit, can you post your role PM but exclude anything that would reveal the identity of your teammate?